I think the derailer looks interesting and I thought about buying one, but not for $132 or whatever.
I am fine with them buying up the whole lot.
If they charged what they did for them because they need money, I understand, but still wish they decided to make money another way, like sell more hats that are sold out and will sell out again ;)
If they charged what they did following the mentality of "there are only a few derailers so we must raise the barrier to them" then I wish they limited access to them based on some other criterion. Their approach is in favor of people with more money having greater access, which is very much in line with how the world works.
But it doesn't seem very Riv-ish.
I understand their ethos of "you don't need a $100 derailer; the $30 works just fine".
But what am I to make of "use the $30 derailer that we're selling for $130"? Again, seems in conflict with their own approach.
This is not intended to be a harsh criticism; this little thing is just that: minor.
I wish they kept them all for Riv builds or only sold them in-person or based on how old your Riv account is or something like that.
Thanks for the tip Laing.
I guess now I should just go ahead and buy the derailer I was looking at on ebay that sold for $50 and there's maybe one available for $60. Or try to hold strong to the parts bin approach.
Good call on this post Bill.
-Matthew
using friction when indexing has gone south, thinking about going south too and just using friction
in San Diego
On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 2:11:20 PM UTC-7 Bill Lindsay wrote: