A few thoughts on this thread:
1) That eyelet is actually a cast part of the dropout, not a braze-on, unless I'm mistaken. So it's quite a bit stronger than it looks. Still, I agree with the consensus that the hanger (also cast into the dropout) is going to be stronger still, and I wouldn't let it connect with that eylet.
2) On Bill's thoughts in regard to the cassette torque. I've always been under the assumption that the high torque rating for cassettes was to ensure sufficient friction between each cog and spacer, thereby ensuring (mostly) they all work together as a unit instead of separately. With a steel driver spline, this may not be too important, but I've seen some pretty ate up aluminum splines, where individual cogs were able to press into the softer aluminum. You can still get some spline damage even with higher cassette torque, but it's far less than an under-torqued cassette.
...As a side note, in my background with diesel engines, 40nm is actually pretty low... We'd spec M10 bolts to 48nm, M12 bolts to 80nm. I still have to recalibrate my mindset when working on bikes to avoid hamfisting things...
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018 at 2:29:49 AM UTC-5, John Rinker wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has experience with using the Stein 'hypercracker' Shimano cassette remover on their Riv frames. In particular, I concerned about where the locking device (mini-stud) would connect with the dropout- right on a braze-on- when using the tool to remove the lock-ring on the cassette. According to Stein's instructions, one is not supposed to let the mini-stud connect with the derailleur hanger and so recommends the the back of the dropout. Unfortunately (fortunately in most cases!), Riv's have a braze-on right there. Seems to me that it would pop that braze-on right off. Seems to me the derailleur hanger would be much stronger.
>
>
>