On Jun 14, 2012 (Thursday), at 11:11 PM, Alec Moskvin wrote:
> Hi Ingvar,
>
> If you could maintain it downstream, that would be great!
Yes. I build fedora packages in OBS but I cannot test it and I feel I use some black magic to get it building there.
>
> I'm not sure why the version number is so long (I guess it's from OBS?),
> but you can get our tarball here:
the version number was corrupted by me in building and it will be fixed in new release. (Now I don't want to rebuild it to prevent users from panic of "downgrade").
so stable packages are here:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/X11:/QtDesktop/
development (time-to-time git snapshots) here (see fixed version):
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/X11:/QtDesktop:/trunk/
>
https://github.com/Razor-qt/razor-qt/downloads
>
> And glad to see how Razor managed to suit your need :)
>
> Thanks,
> Alec
>
> On Tuesday 12 June 2012 13:57:25, Ingvar wrote:
>> Hello, Razor-qt devs
>>
>> I came over razor-qt when searching for a lightweight desktop
>> environment built on qt, but missed packages for Fedora 17. I added
>> the trivial patches needed and built packages for ppc, x86_64 and
>> i686.
>>
>> The story:
>>
>>
http://ingvar.blog.redpill-linpro.com/2012/06/12/razor-qt-for-fedora-17/
>>
>> Packages/yum repo:
>>
>>
http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/razorqt/
>>
>> And btw, the upstream rpm specfiles have an error: The fedora version
>> macro should be named %fedora, not %fedora_version. This is fixed in
>> the srpms I built. The necessary trivial patches for fedora 17 are
>> also included. Please fix upstream.
>>
>> I was asked to maintain these packages downstream for Fedora. I'm
>> willing to do that, unless someone in your team already plan to do it.
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Thanks for this project. It made my day :-)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Ingvar Hagelund
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Razor-qt" group.
> For more options, visit this group at
>
http://groups.google.com/group/razor-qt?hl=en