In ML implementations the proportion of invariant sites is estimated via
a free parameter.
Invariant sites do affect the topology since they have the effect to
shrink branch lengths.
For more background on the the topic I'd suggest reading the respective
section in Ziheng Yang's wonderful textbook.
Alexis
On 20.01.2017 14:32, Alicia S. Arroyo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am studying a gene family using RAxML and using ProtTest in order to
> know the best model.
>
> I am wondering what is the real meaning of invariant sites. Does it mean
> that an invariant site is a position of the alignment that is *exactly*
> the same in all sequences? If this is the case but one sequence has a
> gap in this position, this is still considered an invariant site?
>
> Let's say we have one invariant site in our alignment, does this
> position affect to the topology of the tree? I would say no because
> these invariant sites are not informative enough to make phylogenetic
> inferences across the taxa. However, we have tested a bit these
> conditions and we have found that it actually affects both the topology
> and the bootstrap support.
>
> Could you please clarify a bit these questions?
>
> Thank you very much,
>
>
> A.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "raxml" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
raxml+un...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
raxml+un...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Alexandros (Alexis) Stamatakis
Research Group Leader, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies
Full Professor, Dept. of Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University
of Arizona at Tucson
www.exelixis-lab.org