Eager to test this out, but worried about the startup time.
Does the startup time only affect map/reduce indexes, i can probably
remove some of my map/reduce indexes to improve startup time this time
around if so.
Paul
On 19 December 2012 11:09:24, Oren Eini (Ayende Rahien) wrote:
> We actually noticed that there are still issues there, but I am happy
> that we are moving in the right direction.
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Iulian Margarintescu
> <
eti...@gmail.com <mailto:
eti...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> It has only been 30-35minutes since i've deployed 2174 <tel:2174>
> instead of 2173 <tel:2173> but the difference is huge. Memory
> consumption is normal ( actually below normal ) cpu is idle, and
> indexes are up to date and only get stale for short periods of
> time. Also overall noticeable performance is a lot better than
> 2170 <tel:2170> and 2173 <tel:2173>. The db has ~250k documents
> some larger ( 100-150kb ) some smaller ( <20kb). Hopefully it will
> continue running smoothly.
>
> Thanks for all the great work,
> Iulian
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 <tel:2012> 10:48:13 AM UTC+2, Oren
> Eini wrote:
>
> Well, I hope that this should alleviate the memory issues that
> we have been seeing:
>
>
http://hibernatingrhinos.com/__builds/ravendb-unstable-v2.0/__2174-unstable