I am new to this API, I tried it with ArcGIS Online it works fine. But when I try to connect to our local ArcGIS portal, it doesn't work. Can anybody kindly point me to the right direction? I highly suspect that the problem is the API can't pick up my windows credentials which is required to login the portal.
Update: I just tried the python window in ArcGIS Pro, I can login our portal from there omitting the username and password ---- and I print out the user information, it seems the API picked up my windows login inside of ArcGIS Pro. Python window in Pro is not the ideal environment for me to do my tasks.
I think I may be experiencing a similar issue. Can you provide some detail on what you meant when you said "I overwrote the arcgis related packages under anaconda3 using the packages under ArcGIS pro"? I don't currently have Anaconda3 installed. I have Anaconda 2, and toggle between environments with settings in my IDE. Any assistance would be appreciated.
Yeah, that's not my problem. I have multiple Python environments and successfully switch between them and have successfully used the Python API for other actions. I'm trying to connect to a secure ArcGIS Enterprise service and having no luck. I've successfully accessed secure hosted services before, but just updated Pro and wondering if something went awry. I was curious what the original poster meant by replacing arcgis related packages under Anaconda3 using the packages under ArcGIS Pro. I'm not seeing an Anaconda3 set of things under my Pro folder, and don't have A3 installed. I'm assuming the original poster did have A3 installed and worked to get the API dependencies setup with it also. Not sure...
I did the same thing as he did to get it to work with an Aneconda install. One thing you could do is just use the ArcGIS Pro install of python and add the packages for the python API (can event do with the Pro tools). What I did was copy the files in the /lib folder from a pro installation to the /lib folder in my Anecoda install. Not sure why but this fixed the issue with connecting using single sign on AD. I have had weird behavior with install, sometimes it has worked right off the bat, another I had to do as the original poster describes.
Imagine a single easy-to-use console built just for you, your team, and your projects. This unified hub significantly simplifies building, deploying, and managing your cloud resources. Organize your portal to custom-fit your work and your work style. Stay on top of the things that matter most by pinning them to your dashboard. Resize tiles to show just the right amount of detail, and share insights across apps and resources.
Whether you need support because of an alert notification or you notice issues when you view events and audit logs, help is only a click away. Microsoft provides the full range of resources to help you get started and grow, including access to our communities and forums, specific troubleshooting information, and direct support from a world-class Azure support representative. Plus, you have access to a direct feedback channel for the Azure product team.
I have IWA configured for our on-premise portal and we are having a problem where users are being prompted to enter their Windows credentials before accessing portal. From the documentation that I have read, users should pass right through and not have to log in at all as long as they have a user account (which they do). From the Documentation:
There are several ways to address the issue if the problem is tied to browser security zones. One way is to ensure the site is in the local intranet zone, which allows credential passing by default. Another option is to enable credential passing in the internet zone, which I strongly discourage. If you are not able to manually change IE security settings because of group policy, you will have to reach out to your IT department to ask about why your site is showing up in the internet zone.
Hi Joshua - Thanks for mentioning browser settings (security zones) - It was key in getting ours working with (first) IE, Edge, and Chrome. This video was really helpful, but doesn't cover it as I recall (maybe its implied and I'm lacking).
Anyway, Thanks! So, Firefox remains an issue for us though. It appears accepting AD credentials is somehow tied to Firefox cached site data or browsing history. Is there a Firefox config similar to IE internet options>Security> zones?
The Division I Council on Wednesday approved changes to notification-of-transfer windows across all sports, including a reduction from 60 to 45 total days in both FCS and FBS football, and 45 consecutive days for men's and women's basketball.
The Division I Council on Wednesday approved changes to notification-of-transfer windows across all sports, including a reduction from 60 to 45 total days in both FCS and FBS football and a reduction from 60 to 45 consecutive days for men's and women's basketball.
"We are pleased the student-athlete voice was acknowledged and emphasized as part of the conversation about amending transfer windows," said Cody Shimp, chair of the Division I SAAC and former baseball student-athlete at St. Bonaventure. "We are happy that the council was able to find common ground and push forward a 45-day window to continue to provide a reasonable period of time for student-athletes to make rational and informed decisions about their athletic and academic futures."
New transfer windows for Football Bowl Subdivision and Football Championship Subdivision football will include a 30-day window beginning the Monday after FBS conference championship games. For student-athletes on teams that compete in the postseason (for example: College Football Playoff, FCS championship, bowl games) there will be an additional five-day transfer window following the contest.
"In both men's and women's basketball, the council determined that a 45-day window that concludes on or before May 1 best enables coaches to understand their current rosters, provides stability for student-athletes remaining at the school as they prepare for summer basketball, and encourages student-athletes who intend to transfer to do so before final exams at their current schools and summer school application deadlines at most campuses," said Lynda Tealer, chair of the council and deputy athletics director at Florida. "Moving forward, we will continue to evaluate the impact of transfer windows on student-athletes, coaches and athletics programs."
The council also heard from the Legislative Committee on an update to graduate transfer waiver guidelines. The Legislative Committee noted that notification-of-transfer deadlines of May 1 for fall and winter sports and July 1 for spring sports apply to graduate transfers transferring for the first time, and that beginning in 2024-25, graduate students seeking waivers for postgraduate eligibility will need to comply with those same deadlines.
Additionally, the council eliminated the requirement that an undergraduate transfer student-athlete count against financial aid limits if that student-athlete voluntarily withdraws from the school for nonathletics reasons.
The council voted to eliminate the annual limit on initial counters in both FBS and FCS (previously 25 and 30 per year, respectively, per program). Limits on initial counters had been suspended by the council in 2021 as a result of uncertainty during the COVID-19 pandemic and the implementation of the one-time transfer exception.
The council also affirmed changes to spring practice rules to specify that protective equipment is limited to helmets and spider pads. The action is the first legislative change under the pilot sport oversight committee model, in which the Football Oversight Committee adopted the proposal, which was subject to council review prior to implementation.
Addison had just won the Biletnikoff Award as the nation's best wide receiver and had positioned himself as a top NFL prospect. Later that month, he transferred to USC, leaving Pitt's coaches scrambling for a replacement with only a few months left until the season started.
Transferring -- and using the portal, which launched in the fall of 2018 -- has become a staple of college football, even more so after the NCAA eliminated a rule in April 2021 that required transfers to sit out a year at their new university. The rule granted them a one-time waiver to transfer without penalty and with immediate eligibility, and it opened the floodgates of player movement: 1,695 FBS players entered the portal in the 2019-20 cycle, and that number increased to 3,085 in 2021-22.
The new rule, however, has been an adjustment -- and opportunity -- for football programs, which now have to construct their rosters on a year-to-year basis. Coaches have to manage scholarship numbers, recruit their own roster to keep players happy and maintain the workload to evaluate potential transfers. Oh, and they also have to win games, too.
"We have to start thinking like NFL teams -- you're rebuilding every offseason," a personnel director for a Power 5 school said. "Your culture is changing every year and there's almost too much chaos to it."
Now, there's a twist to how the transfer portal works. To limit the uncertainty around scholarship numbers and streamline the process for players, the Division I Council approved in August new transfer window dates for when players can enter the portal. Instead of being able to leave a school at any time, players now have to enter the portal within set dates. The first window opens the day after the championship teams are selected, which will be Dec. 5, and closes 45 days later on Jan. 18, 2023. There is also a 15-day spring period from May 1-15.
How will these looming transfer window dates affect the sport, both now and in the future? How do coaches feel about the new rules? And what are the disadvantages? We talked to coaches and player personnel directors across the country to better understand the changing college football landscape.
c80f0f1006