Hi Chris,
We started out implementing WAMP2 inside of the Ratchet project but decided to bring it out on its own because we wanted to implement it in a transport-independent way. I have also looked at the PR and it looks like that implementation differs from the direction we are going.
I would like to contribute back what I can to the Ratchet project as it was the starting point (and we are dependent on it for the websocket server, and soon, the websocket client) for some of the work that we are doing now and would be open to suggestions on ways to do that.
We are working to get a turnkey WAMP2 implementation for both client and server that is as easy as possible to setup and get working to promote more adoption (and hopefully get more people contributing).
Thank you for getting Pawl out so quickly – I have starting implementing the client transport in our project with it.
Tobias – we are working on thinking up a new name and will hopefully have that changed soon. Like Chris said, we had difficulty with using WAMP in the name as it is easily recognizable as something else and we don't want people to get confused.
Thanks,
Matt