Pro Tools 10 Mavericks
Beaulah Mozie
New labeling system with card stock inserts
12" width
20" height when unrolled
YKK rust-proof zippers with pull string
1,000D Cordura nylon waterproof fabric
Reinforced handle holds up to 60 lbs
Heavy-duty D-rings lets you hang anywhere
Sturdy, weather-proof buckle
Reinforced stitching
My Maverick tool roll is an awesome addition to my personal truck. It has plenty of room for all of my essential and emergency tools. The noise dampening canvas makes for quiet transportation. I plan on getting one for my wife and daughters cars.
This tool roll is just what my ocd needed. Bright, fluorescent orange. Built like a brick outhouse. Strong fabric, bold labels, and it rolls up. What's not to like. I've got several rothco bags that this is replacing, and now I have to break into my garage tool boxes to fill it up. It's deceiving how much you can fit in these things. I'll put them through the ringer and let you know how I feel in a few months.
I really like being able to put similar tools together in their own pouch, it is so much easier to find what I am looking for. My only suggestion for improvement is include some straps on the outside that can be used to hold a breaker bar or ratchet that is too long to fit inside the pouches.
We are partnered with USPS, UPS, FedEX, and DHL to offer the fastest shipping option possible depending on your order's destination. Orders are processed on the next business day. We ship out of southern California, and depending on destination it usually takes 2-5 business days to arrive.
If you placed an order with us, you can be sure to expect updated emails. Please check any "non-primary" inboxes in your email account, as it likely ended up there. Also, be sure to check any other emails you use as it may have autofilled a different email during checkout. If none of this works, feel free to contact us at in...@officialtoolroll.com.
Yes. All customers will receive an order number after placing their orders. In the unforeseen event that you do not receive confirmation, please email us immediately at in...@officialtoolroll.com. Real people ready to provide real solutions from 9-6pm (EST) Mon-Fri.
As is often the case after a Mac OS X upgrade, installing Ruby gems that depend on compiled C code can require a bit of fiddling about. I've just upgraded my laptop to Mavericks, and lo and behold, the nokogiri Ruby gem won't install. I should have had dj vu here, as I went through a similar process installing nokogiri on Leopard!
The top tip in the error message (see above) was that the output had been written to tmp/ports/libxml2/2.8.0/configure.log. I had a look inside, and lo and behold, it turned out that I didn't have a working C compiler.
I suspected I didn't actually have XCode at this point. I wish I'd checked, as I'd discovered that it was there, and I'd have launched it to check that it was in fact version 5. See my footnote at the bottom of this post to find out why; if your problem resembles mine at this point I recommend launching XCode and checking that it doesn't also report that bits are missing!
The standard advice online for getting the XCode command line tools installed on Mavericks is to run xcode-select --install. So I did that, and a small dialog popped up and then proceeded to download the command line tools for me. I rather thought I was set at this point. But no...
If, after re-running gem install ... you find that the gem still won't install, and that the configure.log file still complains that you don't have any command line tools, try cd-ing into the directory of the code that won't build and running make.
It appears as though xcode-select could have asked me to accept a license agreement. Instead, you're prompted the first time you try and run the command line binary, and the Ruby build scripts had gobbled up the error message.
Note that I didn't run XCode 5 inbetween upgrading to it (in the App Store app) and trying to build any Ruby gems. When I did finally run it (after I'd successfully got gcc installed), I was presented with a dialog box asking if I'd like to "install additional required components?"
UPDATE: Since writing this post I've upgraded to Mavericks on a second computer, ran into the same problem, and launched XCode. After it had installed its missing components I could run gcc without being prompted to accept a license agreement, and gem compilation just worked. Also take a look at the comments below, where others have been explaining what's worked for them.
The data we used to build this tool came from many, many sources. While some hops have well established information on them, others not so much. We've manually curated this data by scouring hundreds of websites, research papers and marketing material from hop breeders, sellers and farms. We've done our best to accurately provide as much information as possible for each hop inside our database. This tool is a one-of-a-kind product that you can only find on Beer Maverick. We take pride in or ability to produce quality tools for the brewing community.
BeerMaverick makes money through affiliate partner links: If you click on a link, we may earn a commission. Our writers create all reviews, patterns, and other content to inform readers, with no influence from our advertisers. Learn more about our policies and disclosures.
If Xcode is installed on your machine, then there is no need to install them. Xcode comes bundled with all your command-line tools. OS X 10.9 includes shims or wrapper executables. These shims, installed in /usr/bin, can map any tool included in /usr/bin to the corresponding one inside Xcode. xcrun is one of such shims, which allows you to find or run any tool inside Xcode from the command line. Use it to invoke any tool within Xcode from the command line.
In Mavericks, the Xcode Command Line Tools can be downloaded from the ADC downloads page like with previous versions. Now, though, they can be also be installed on-demand in a similar fashion to how Java has been installed since Lion, by simply invoking a command installed by them such as otool, or a new option in the xcode-select utility: --install.
Similarly, Rich Trouton has also (of course) previously documented the trigger necessary to do an automated install of the latest Java 6 update available in Software Update, which uses an environment variable instead of a trigger file.
The tags are something that the Software Update framework or helper tools can parse to filter out candidate update packages. These are usually used by system tools and preferences other than `softwareupdate[/cci] itself, for example for finding Boot Camp ESD packages, printer drivers and speech assets.
A simple, though not exactly clean, way to do this is to scrape the output of the softwareupdate utility to extract the label for the update we want. I have a general-purpose script for installing Xcode CLI tools on 10.7 through 10.9 here.
An better alternative might be to look at the contents of /Library/Updates/ProductMetadata.plist after running softwareupdate -l, and search the tags that were already extracted for us in a nice structured format. We find an item like this:
The introduction of the Mavericks environment has revealed a number ofissues with building packages, most of which are due to C/C++ codethat relies too heavily on the GCC way of doing things. Most problemsrevealed by the transition to Mavericks are caused by C++ codingpractices that are universally recognized as problematic, and areaddressed by adhering to established best practices.
Issues related to naming, particularly incircumventing the protections offered by C++ namespaces. GCC headerorganization seems to be more forgiving of loose naming, whereas theMavericks environment is more exacting.
Because a number of bugs in packages are related to memory addressingor layout errors, relying on a debugger alone might not be sufficientto track down memory errors. Valgrind is thepremier tool for detecting memory errors.
Use Valgrind for memory addressing problems; because so many errorson the Mavericks platform are related to memory addressing problems,many errors should be equally discoverable using Valgrind on Linux.
The Rcpp CRAN package allows seamless integration of C++ with R, and iscross-platform. The package affords many of the same benefits for theR C interface that make C++ so appealing as a language, whileeliminating many of the pitfalls of programming to the R interface.
A typical symptom of a name resolution error is the compiler complainsthat the type or number of arguments a function got is different fromwhat it expects, and the compiler points to a C++ header file in thestandard library.
For convenience, R aliases common identifiers from Rheaders. E.g., Rf_length(SEXP) becomes length(SEXP). While thismay be convenient for C, the organization of headers in theMavericks environment seems to lead to more collisions than withGCC. See relevant section of the Writing R ExtensionsManual
Solution: prevent re-mapping of R identifiers for C++ code bydefining the R_NO_REMAP symbol. This can be done at the package levelwith a -DR_NO_REMAP preprocessor flag, or on a file-by-file basis with#define R_NO_REMAP. Use fully-qualified versions of R identifiers,usually by prepending Rf_.
As pointed out in the cppreference Notessectionthe use of the using namespace std directive introduces the entirestd namespace for name resolution. There is a high likelihood thatamong all the headers in the standard library there is an identifierthat conflicts with the identifiers in your package.
Using-declarations can also be block-scoped. This is preferred overusing-declarations at global scope, as it prevents the unnecessaryintroduction of names at the global scope, a tenet of good namespacehygiene:
unspecified behavior is consistent and documented, but decided byan implementation. These are behaviors that are either notmentioned at all by the respective standard, or are mentioned tosay that they are implementation-dependent. Well-known examplesinclude the size of the int type and the size of pointers.
d3342ee215