I attach most of my collection of writings on the workings (including diagrams) of the Wil Schuemann-Gene Moore Total Energy Sytem in PDF format.  It is a compilation of what I could find regarding the Total Energy System of Will Schuemann.  Included in the PDF is a diagram of a calibration workbench as well as the diagrams of the model "A" and model "B" sytems.  Within the attached PDF there is also mention of a 16mm movie made of the calibration workbench during an exercise of the calibration method that was shown to the audience during that particular Soaring Symposia.  At one time, the workbench for calibration was in a workshop in California by the proprietor who took over the Sage variometer business.  I inquired about the workbench and was told is presence is unknown.
I do know that the calibration was used to determine the length of a fine capillary tube, which was unique for a particular polar curve of a particular sailplane.  When the Total Energy System, also known as the "Schuemann TE Box", was connected to a Sage mechanical variometer one would obtain netto vertical airmass velocity.
I think it is entirely possible to reconstruct the method of calibration.  It would take someone with a substantial understanding of fluid dynamics and mathematics.
I wonder if that 16mm movie of the calibration testing is archived somewhere.  I believe that Gene Moore gave that very presentation.
I have heard that the clear U shaped tube that can be seen on the top of the cylinder of the Total Enery "B" box is very fragile and takes great care to disassemble/reassemble, to change the length of the capillary tube (for polar compensation).  That U shaped tube carries the capillary tube necessary for polar calibration from one compartment of the "box" to another, totally separated, part of the box.  Helmut Reichmann's book of Cross Country Soaring has a diagram of how this length of capillary tube is theoretically derived for a netto variometer.  It is quite useful to review this chapter as a basis of understanding the Schuemann-Moore variometer.  The difference between an "A" model and "B" model is that the "B" model had an addition mechanical mechanism for compensating for different static air pressure at different altitudes.
Good luck with your efforts.  If you make significant advancement in your quest, I would appreciate the news.
Sincerely,
John Iacobucci NB