The anatomy of seismograms: visualizing P, Pdiff, PcP, PKP, PKiKP, PKIKP, PKJKP, PKKP, PKKKP, PPP phases

147 views
Skip to first unread message

Branden Christensen

unread,
Oct 16, 2017, 1:55:10 PM10/16/17
to RaspberryShake
Hi Shakers:


Buenas tardes. 

Every now and again you find an absolute gem on Twitter. To understand the anatomy of seismograms, check this out: https://twitter.com/raspishake/status/919984051880161280

What have you seen with your Shake?


Yours,


Branden Christensen
Director, OSOP & Gempa GeoServices
Director, Raspberry Shake project, Social Media: @raspishake

GeraldP

unread,
Oct 16, 2017, 5:29:31 PM10/16/17
to RaspberryShake
Nice video.  Thanks.

QUESTION:  You are not responsible for the music score for the video, are you?  

Using WinQuake software it is possible to display various ray paths.  In addition to the obvious P & S wave times, what other wave selections might one expect from a Shake? Or, does that depend upon the distance, magnitude and depth?  

Thank you

Jos Gysenbergs

unread,
Oct 17, 2017, 10:09:14 AM10/17/17
to RaspberryShake
Well, for once I found the music acceptable, let's say at -60 dB. It sounds as if the author had given it some thought. Normally YouTube sound is muted here because of utterly boring and distracting. Automated subtitles are a bless. Just my 2 €c.

Video is excellent. Tks for the link and a 'me too' for Gerald's question. - JG

tinotenaz

unread,
Oct 17, 2017, 10:48:16 AM10/17/17
to RaspberryShake

Hi,

it depends on the magnitude, distance, and depth. But usually you can see the Surface Waves (Love and Rayleigh) and other reflected waves like Pp, Pc, or refracted waves like Ps, PkP etc.

For example, if you are very close to the source, you can easily identify the direct P wave, otherwise what you see is the P refracted. Also if the Earthquake is very shallow, the Surface waves could be seen very close to the S wave on a very close station, and sometimes both are overlapping each other.

Here you can find an excellent explanation of all this, 


Take a look at this image where it is identified different seismic waves on a seismograph 

Branden Christensen

unread,
Oct 17, 2017, 10:54:16 AM10/17/17
to RaspberryShake
And for a higher resolution of that IRIS seismic poster see: 


Branden Christensen
Director, OSOP & Gempa GeoServices
Director, Raspberry Shake project, Social Media: @raspishake

--
Some useful links:
 
Manual: http://manual.raspberryshake.org/
Do It YourSelf Page: http://raspberryshake.org/do-it-yourself
Shop: https://shop.raspberryshake.org/
Website: http://raspberryshake.org/
 
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/raspishake/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/raspishake/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/raspishake/
Hashtag: #rasperryshake
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RaspberryShake" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to raspberryshake+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to raspberryshake@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/raspberryshake.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/raspberryshake/397ca270-5224-4341-97c9-cd25e912ccdb%40googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

GeraldP

unread,
Oct 17, 2017, 1:57:55 PM10/17/17
to RaspberryShake
Excellent information Tino & Braden.  

Years ago, I was using homemade sensors and receiving teleseismic waves.  I was using Lehman type sensors and getting fairly good response.  Of course, that sensitive required temperature control and other minute cautions.  I would have to wait sometimes for an hour to get all the phases.

My question now:  (Keep in mind that I am using WinSDR and WinQuake software.)  Using the Shake, is it necessary to have a minimum time to wait before capturing the event?  I would suspect, even with a large EQ and deep, that I would not receive some of the reflected phases etc..  I also assume that reflected waves loose intensity as they travel through the earth.

Sorry for all the questions,  I am trying to learn!   Can OLD DOG learn new tricks?

tinotenaz

unread,
Oct 18, 2017, 9:06:02 AM10/18/17
to RaspberryShake
Hi Gerald,

we are so happy to know how our clients are exciting about learning Seismology, we are here to support all of you on any question related.

Regards to your question, it also depends on the Earthquake (EQ) parameters; magnitude, depth, location, etc. If you, for instance, wants to see on one Raspberry Shake all the possible seismic waves generated for an EQ, this is not possible as out device is designed for local EQ. Of course you can expect to see some waves arriving from distance big EQ, but this are not going to carry on all the information. You could see, most of the time, P refracted waves, and for the on well installed and on the right location relative to the EQ, you can expect to record the S wave. Part of the surface waves could be also be recorded, but the ideal device for recording these kind of waves are the broad band, these go upper than 100 seconds of period, where this seismic waves are found.

So, if you wonder how long should you wait in order to record with a Shake all the seismic waves from a distant EQ, I would'n wait longer than 5 minutes after the P arrival, after this confidence on the records is lost. However, if you have a well installed broad band equipment, you can record for hours different kind of seismic waves, even the ones reflected from the Earth's core, depending on the EQ's magnitude.

I hope have shed some light on this. 

GeraldP

unread,
Oct 18, 2017, 12:31:24 PM10/18/17
to RaspberryShake
Tinotenaz, this has been an exceptional answer.  I have been using 5 minutes normally and occasionally 10 mins. with the infrequent LARGE EQ's,; and have recorded some Rayleigh waves  etc. on occasion. 

Thank you SO much for these explanations.  I wasn't sure if this was the proper platform to ask such questions not technically directly related to the Shake.  I sincerely appreciate you input.

chris...@aol.com

unread,
Oct 18, 2017, 1:23:48 PM10/18/17
to raspber...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jerry, 

    Earthquakes generate P and S Waves directly. The further these have to travel through 
the Earth, the more any components above about 2 Hz are attenuated. Local quakes may 
generate P waves with frequencies up to over 10 Hz. Teleseismic quakes are likely to have 
P wave frequencies of 1 to 2 Hz. The associated S waves have frequencies about half that 
of the P waves and their velocity is lower. When either impact the surface, Love and 
Rayleigh surface waves are generated. Check out the travel time graphs of time versus 

    Most Surface Waves have periods of about 20 seconds, so a Lehman with a period of 
25 seconds senses them at their full amplitude. Surface waves with periods of ~40 seconds 
would also be recorded, but at ~1/4 their true amplitude. The upper frequency limit depends 
on the filters in the amplifier - often ~10 Hz. 

    A 1 Hz geophone / RShake will still respond to 20 second Surface Waves, but at ~1/400 
their true amplitude - you may still see some from large quakes, since Surface Waves 
have much larger amplitudes than the P or S waves anyway - but don't count on it ! The 
RShake sensitivity is high, so your signals are most likely to be limited by environmental 
noise.  

     Going back to your previous Email, you shouldn't use temperature control with a Lehman 
- that tends to make air current movement signals worse - but you may fit a mildly heated 
Aluminium plate inside the top of the insulated cover to ensure that no vertical air currents 
are generated if the air temperature inside the case falls below the ground temperature 
during a winter night. 

    Regards, 

    Chris

From: tinotenaz <faut...@gmail.com>
To: RaspberryShake <raspber...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:23
Subject: [RShake Forum] Re: The anatomy of seismograms: visualizing P, Pdiff, PcP, PKP, 
PKiKP, PKIKP, PKJKP, PKKP, PKKKP, PPP phases

Hi Gerald,

    We are so happy to know how our clients are exciting about learning Seismology, we are here to support all of you on any question related.
--
Some useful links:
 
Manual: http://manual.raspberryshake.org/
Do It YourSelf Page: http://raspberryshake.org/do-it-yourself
Shop: https://shop.raspberryshake.org/
Website: http://raspberryshake.org/
 
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/raspishake/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/raspishake/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/raspishake/
Hashtag: #rasperryshake
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RaspberryShake" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to raspberryshak...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to raspber...@googlegroups.com.

GeraldP

unread,
Oct 18, 2017, 2:35:00 PM10/18/17
to RaspberryShake
Thank you Chris.  This is ALL good and accurate information, but I do have Lehman devices at present.  This was many years ago.  I am extremely lacking in space to install such sensors.  Consistently, I am ONLY using the SHAKE 1 at present and trying to fine tune my WinQuake and WinSDR programs; PLUS maybe learn a few things as a go.

I'm sure that others on this list will benefit from your information, should they have or want expand into that area too.

Regards, 
Jerry
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages