Thefirst step to renewing a maintenance contract is always to check the existing one. The term Warranty does not correspond to the original meaning in this case. It is not the statutory warranty of six months or one year that is meant here, but rather the status of the maintenance contract with the manufacturer.
You can check this status online with most manufacturers. For this you need the serial number and possibly a type designation of the devices you want to check.
Before you request a maintenance contract, we recommend that you perform a Warranty Check. Determine until when your hardware still has existing maintenance and avoid overlaps and double costs when extending the service for your equipment.
To save you the tedious search for the well hidden Warranty Check Gateways, we have compiled a list of links for the most common manufacturers. We extend and update the list at regular intervals to keep it up to date for our customers.
Have you checked your warranty status and now have all the information? Send us this information and let us know how long you want to maintain your equipment. If your Warranty Check tells you that your hardware has already reached the End of Life (EOL) or End of Support (EOS) status, we can still help you. We support EOL or EOS hardware for at least another seven years.
I have the fi-7160 scanner installed and working, just thought I would share the experience and ask a follow-on question. At first the scanner driver was setup for blank page removal by default, and it took some looking to find out how to turn it off. (I thought it made more sense to do it via LF Scan where it was easier for users to tweak if necessary.) I had to launch the PaperStream Capture software and click the 'Config' icon on the toolbar to access the three default profiles. In the B&W default profile I had to set the Scanner Name from a dropdown, then I could click the Driver Profile button and under the Page options section could disable blank page detection.
1) Does Laserfiche specifically require the existence of the "B&W Default" PaperStream capture profile? What I did seems to work, but nowhere in LF documentation could I find this seemingly necessary piece of info. If you scan in color does it automatically select the Default color profile?
2) In the LF Scan UI, selecting "File / Scanner Settings" brings up the Contrast and Brightness dialog. The Brightness defaults to -127. Is this normal and what is the allowed range for these settings?
For customers that I have worked with that have this scanner or one of a lower model number that use Paperstream I set up the profiles for them for both black and white and color. I have the default scanner software running. I do this by clicking the red check box icon in the scan window and select the radio button.
I don't believe that when selecting the drop downs within the Laserfiche scan client window that it automatically selects the profile. I just have the users click on the profile drop down from the Paperstream pop-up if they are going to scan in color and have them ignore the drop down within the scan client.
I'm actually doing it the other way - I use the laserfiche settings option. None the less, the page dropout features of the B&W default profile were taking effect until I disabled it. So my question is why would this happen when I'm not using the 'default' option you mention.
Hello.
Fujitsu is very interested in flang and would like to help improve its quality.
To confirm the ability of flang, we used flang to compile and execute some of our test sets (FORTRAN 77, 90, 95). The result was that 3447 of the 8247 programs failed. However, errors with the same cause are counted more than once.
First, we will issue the bug reports on errors related to language standards that we consider important.
If there is any guidance or advice from the community, please let us know.
Since there will be too many issues to report, we would like to determine the priority.
First, I organize the results of the test set, create a list of errors, and post it. I think it will take about a few days.
After that, I would like to check the results of the test set and post issues.
Semantic checking in Flang is not complete. Many constraints do not have checks yet. All bugs reports are welcome! A bug report with the constraint number would be great. We use the constraint numbers from the Fortran 2018 standard.
I could be wrong here or there might be a misunderstanding. But I am assuming you downloaded the source from the Release page of LLVM, specifically you downloaded 14.0.6 from -project/releases/tag/llvmorg-14.0.6.
If this is what you used then I think quite a lot of fixes might have gone into Flang after this. Also a lot of code was upstreamed from the fir-dev branch after this. The top 3 commits in 14.0.6 for Flang that I see are dated to February as given below. Typically a minor release like 14.0.6 will only contain specific fixes that are picked into the 14.* release branch. For Flang we have not ported any of the fixes into 14.* release since Flang is not yet ready for users.
Since many of the issues that you see might have been fixed, it would be better to trim the list to avoid reporting fixed issues. I think there are two ways to proceed as given below. Would either of these work for you?
The error list I reported this time seems that the flang I used was old. As a result, the test set resulted in many errors. A few days ago, I was able to successfully compile and execute several test sets in error using the latest flang.
It will be helpful if you could indicate whether the issue is because of a non-standard extension. For e.g, I believe the automatic in [fang] Compilation error in automatic statement Issue #58968 llvm/llvm-project GitHub is an extension.
High standby loads of mini-splits are a well known issue, which is why sizing them correctly is important. Oversizing them to where they're cycling rather than modulating at low duty-cycle cuts severely into net efficiency.
As this is the smallest model, over sizing would be tough.
And while trying to size so a unit is always running at low duty may mask the 80 watt load, it is a bit unrealistic in many climates where the weather does change or in buffer seasons where only peak/low noon and nigh time temperatures require some heating/cooling.
Bob- I'm not saying that there's anything YOU can do about it being oversized for the shoulder season load other than a hard power-switch, but pointing out one of the hazards encountered when people do dumb rule-of thumb sizing and end up with a 2-ton mini-split for a 5000BTU/hr peak load, and the thing spends it's whole life in standby mode.
The reason for the high standby loss is that the power supplies and are all up & running to keep the control boards (basically embedded computers) on alert 24 hours/day waiting for the call to do something. In most cold-weather units there are even resistance heaters keeping compressor bearings & components at a temp where they will always be within mechanical tolerance so that it can start up without damage, but at least those usually automatically turn off at higher outdoor temps. (Wintertime standby losses can be a couple hundred watts.)
The highest efficiencies tend to occur at the lowest speed, so there's no "masking" of the load of the control power use- it's fully integrated into the SEER/HSPF numbers, since the power to the controls is not separate from the rest. As long as the compressor and blowers are turning (even at min-speed), it's still moving heat. When it's all just idling, it's not.
I'm not sure how many people bother to install hard switches, but those who care about standby losses can kill it at the breaker. But if you need the thing to be able to respond to the remote at your whim, the power to the controls need to be booted up and alive, and for your version of the 9RLS2, that's apparently 80 watts. I suspect that even within a model name the standby losses have been incrementally falling with design revisions to the sub assemblies, but I don't really know that. The engineering teams behind these beasts are well aware of the issue, but there's a stronger drive for enhancing the operating efficiencies to get higher test numbers than there is to reduce the standby losses. Like desktop computers, it clearly IS possible to design "sleep" modes to the controls down a more power-sipping level, but the market hasn't really demanded that (yet.) I fully agree that 80W of phantom load per unit is pretty power-piggy (and why multi-splits are sometimes a better solution than 3-4 single units, despite lower SEER/HSPF test numbers.)
I'm measuring using an Effergy clamp on unit, similar to a TED and the like.
It is an inexpensive unit that is portable, which I like as I can use it to test/check usage, and it's wireless unlike the TED. I don't really need to spend 10 times as much or log every appliance separately 24/7.
If you want to check your units. Try to get your home to a stable load, where your meter is consistent - even better if you can get nearly everything off. Then measure the meter with the units on and off at the breaker. A 320watt change will be easy to measure. make sure the remotes don't trigger the units on; also possible the systems may draw a bit of power when you flick the breaker on.
My Daikin exhibits the exact same 80 - 100W standby load and
the resultant 2 kwh/day or so consumption. The bulk of it goes
to the compressor crankcase heat, which in this case [and
probably most other modern units] is done not by resistance
heating, but by the inverter itself bleeding a little extra
current through the motor coils in a way that creates heat
but doesn't actually turn the motor. And when it does this
is intermittent, so I don't see the current draw all the time.
If I listen very carefully at the outdoor unit I can hear a
high-pitched whining from the electronics when it's doing
this warming stuff, and nothing when it's not. I also have IR
shots in my house-saga clearly showing that area of the condenser
unit staying warm [which is one of the things that tends to
attract critters into them in cold weather, so screen off all
those holes!]
3a8082e126