Download Catia V5 R19 Full Crack

[Kristin Banyas]

Whenbrowsing the mail storage I see filenames containing ":" which is invalid for Windows. Dovecot uses it for adding some sort of status info to the filenames in the maildirs. I want to leave it that way. But Windows cannot read those files.

I've tried mangled names = Yes but that does only clobber up the filenames till unusuability. It converts all filenames with illegal characters into 8.3 format - we cannot use this for recovery. And I don't think it would have an effect on VFS settings anyway.

So why does samba not use the VFS module? I can see no errors about it in the logs. And "locate" reveals the respective library vfs_catia.so installed. The samba version is supposed to support this configuration according to docs:

Now you want to apply the downloaded patch to the file: source3/modules/vfs_catia.c in the samba-3.6.3 folder. I couldn't work out how to apply the diff using 'patch' so applied it manually - it's only 3 lines. Rebuild the samba package, in the samba-3.6.3/ folder:

The Catia CAD package commonly creates filenames thatuse characters that are illegal in CIFS filenames. Thevfs_catia VFS module implements a charactermapping so that these files can be shared with CIFS clients.

We are currently using solidworks as our primary design software and mastercam as our primary CAM software. We are looking to buy a seat of CATIA because we are doing a lot of development work with a company that uses CATIA to design, and we wish to maintain Solid histories/feature tree. I have aquired a sample version of CATIA and my initial thoughts are that it looks pretty complicated! I worked with Unigraphics NX for a couple of years and I guess it seems more like it than solidworks. Besides the pricing, can anyone give me accounts of there experiences and how CATIA compares as a CAD package, but also as a CAM package? We will definitely be keeping solidworks as our primary CAD software for now and will keep mastercam as our CAM software too. Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks for the responses! Have any of you had any experience with the CATIA training courses? I'm not sure of the specifics but I'm sure we will invest in at least the fundamental training courses. Do you think this will be a sufficient for someone with a CAD/CAM background to get a useable handle on how to work the software? Obviously they won't come off the training courses as an expert, but just as far as basic solid and surface manipulation, are the training courses good for learning these aspects? Keeping in mind that we will still have solidworks there as our primary package

I come from an Autodesk Inventor background and took catia classes and had no problem drawing it in. Now I only designed in it and never actually did detail drawings. So the detail part of it I dont know but the actual 3d drawing was no problem after the training courses.

All in all, they both have their strengths and weaknesses. I prefer CATIA now primarily due to the the things I mentioned, but either package is capable on the CAM side. If it were up to me the deciding factor would be the type of work I did. If it is aerospace where models are primarily in CATIA from creation, and it is large multi-axis parts then CATIA I would choose. If it were not aircraft and/or primarily 3 and 4 axis work on smaller-mid sized parts I would choose mastercam.

I agree with most of what Merritt (MLS) said. Catia will do just about everything & is very expensive. We train it here and our instructors consistantly win a yearly competition for Catia drivers. I've taken four of the courses we offer and didn't have too much trouble learning it. I took the machining module in R11 and it was very cumbersome but I've heard there have been many changes for the better in the machining module now at R21. Since we train Catia we get it very cheap but we have never cut a chip with it because we get no break on post price. We have a Mazak Integrex in the engineering Dept. and I heard a post for that cost $25,000.

Thanks everyone for your thoughts on the matter. I should've mentioned that we are working aerospace and large assemblies/complex surfaces in some cases. I guess the picture that is getting painted for me is that CATIA is great at high end surfacing/machining, but for simpler work mastercam handles better. I really do like mastercam for the work that we are currently involved with. I will admit that I have not had proper trainng in multi-axis or 3D surfacing toolpaths in mastercam, but I was quite skilled with them in unigraphics and from what i have witnessed it is not mastercams strength. Thanks again. Brendan

I'd completely agree with gcode's asessment. Complicated as hell on the Mfg. Side, but dayum it's powerful. You can enter and exit a part/cut 1,000 different ways (only slight exaggeration). ON the CAD side I'm a mid-range user. It's probably way overkill for what I do but I sure love it. When I need to design workholding, it makes assembly modeling a breeze.

If I were going to make a recommendation, I'd have to look at what exactly you want to do. From a design standpoint, they are both very powerful. CATIA is a little stronger on the surface modeling side than NX, and NX is a little stronger on the solid modeling side. If you're going to do a fair amount of work with organic shapes, I'd lean towards CATIA. If I were leaning more towards the prismatic shaped things then NX cets the nod. If you need PLM... NX edges out CATIA. If you want simulation, NX edges out CATIA, if you need FEA, CATIA edged out NX slightly IMHO. CATIA... Dassault is VERY proud of their software (as they should be) and NX is too, but they are more aggressive at pricing. If they know they are up against CATIA for a sale, they will discount. NX... they like to hear from their customers. CATIA not so much, their motto os "STFU and pay up byotch!". CATIA has a VERY active user's forum. Not quite as active as eMastercam but it is definitely a great resource. I'm not sure about NX user forums. I'd imagine they have something.

Great thanks for your opinion! Like I said initially, the main purpose of getting CATIA for us is the ability to bring in native formats from a large customer and make alterations etc whilst maintaining the feature tree. Good to have an idea of what we will be getting ourselves into and how this compares with other familiar software. Initial cost and maintenace is not an issue for us. I look forward to learning another package and increasing my skillset some more. Thanks everyone for your input!

Ihave used both Catia V5 and NX for design. I think that Catia is smother and easier to use on a windows box as all of the menus are the same format and copy/paste in your friend.NX still has old and new menus which is a pain

In my neck of the woods (Connecticut) we seem to do a lot of jet engine work and the software of choice for larger companies is NX. Pratt & Whitney, GE, Volvo, MTU, etc. all use NX and it is important that we stay linked to the customers' original models. I would say that majority of companies use mastercam, but I have been around long enough to see a lot of them switch over to a different software over the years. It's a shame in a way, because mastercam is where I started programming (using computers) and it will always have a special place, but the truth is the truth. It got lost a long time ago and it's going to take a lot more then a fancy toolpath to bring it back.

Simple post edits I have no problems with, but I'm no post master... One of my co-workers wrote all our posts (multiaxis mill turns, twin turret lathes, etc.) using the post builder. Most of his help he got from the NX forum and not the post builder class which is only a great beginners class (so I am told).

Got to know Catia 4 pretty well several years ago. Would love LOVE to get in someplace where I can learn and drive Catia V5. My Pro/E project here is wrapping up end of March and all new jobs are in SolidWorks.

3a8082e126