Usage of physical USA issued credit cards might be more a problem next year in Europe. I don’t know details for France but best to know what is available/ restricted before going. This is second time the article had been in our local newspaper.
Richard McCaw
richar...@sbcglobal.net
Cell: 408-838-9863
Home: 408-448-2899
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mccaw
No end in sight to credit card woes in Europe
More and more Americans
encounter trouble — often major trouble — trying to use their
credit cards in Europe, and the troubles are spreading to other countries.
Unfortunately, for now, this is a serious problem without a
serious solution. A fix, if any, is probably months if not years away, and
meanwhile the situation for U.S. travelers keeps getting worse.
The problem is straightforward: incompatible security and
verification formats for credit cards:
n U.S. banks use the old “magnetic stripe”
technology for security and charge authorizations: When you buy something in a
restaurant, store or hotel, a terminal reads information from a magnetic strip
on the back of your card and you sign a chit for verification. Automated
systems read the stripe and issue printed receipts.
n Banks almost everywhere else are switching to the newer
“chip-and-pin” system: When you buy something, a terminal or an
automatic machine reads information from a memory chip embedded in your card,
and you enter a PIN for verification. Just about everyone concedes that the
chip-and pin system is more secure.
And just about everyone anywhere else but the United States
is switching. Europe already has switched extensively; Canada, Mexico,
Australia, most of South America and most of Southeast Asia are either
switching or planning to switch. Soon, the United States could be left alone
with an obsolete standard, just as it is with its measurement system.
The problem is also starting to crop up with ATM debit
cards. So far, it isn’t as bad as with credit cards, but just wait
awhile. ...
Even where chip-and-pin cards are the norm, hotels,
restaurants and stores can still accept stripe cards — maybe after a bit
of nudging — but many automated ticket, toll and gasoline vending
machines no longer accept our cards. Some of those are in locations with no
attendant to hand-run a charge, and travelers have found long lines at places
that do have attendants. The website GetFluent-C (http://getfluentc.com/sign-up.aspx
) posts many travelers’ horror stories.
So far, U.S. cards generally work in the transitioning
areas, but that will change, too, and quickly.
What about a solution?
All I can say for sure is, “Not now; maybe later.”
n So far, the only practical advice from the experts is to
take a lot of coins anywhere you expect to need automated machines — many
accept coins but not bills. The other conventional advice is a complete
cop-out: “Plan ahead.” Feh!
n Apparently, the only U.S.-based bank now issuing
chip-and-pin cards is the credit union for the United Nations. No other U.S.
banks have yet announced any plans to issue chip-and-pin cards.
n One bank in Milan issues a special card for American
visitors, which you can get there, but I have no information on its financial
particulars.
However, pressure from tourists, Wal-Mart and other
worldwide merchants is growing on U.S. banks to do something. GetFluent-C is
trying to marshal public support for a switch; I urge you to support its
effort.
The problem is not technology: Apparently banks easily could
issue dual system cards that work in both stripe and chip-and-pin modes. Some
banks already issue dual mode cards with RFID chips for
“contactless” transactions — a different system entirely
— and there’s no technical reason why U.S. banks couldn’t
issue dual-mode chip-and-pin or even three-mode cards.
You’d think big U.S.
banks would want to get out in front of this issue: Evidence
shows that they’re losing money by ignoring chip-and-pin. With its policy
of no surcharge on foreign transactions, Capital One clearly targets
international travelers, and it is an obviously early adopter candidate. So is
Bank of America, with its participation in the Worldwide ATM Alliance.
And American Express certainly should be onboard, with its
long-standing commitment to international travel. Unfortunately, I
haven’t yet heard a peep out of them.
This is an extremely rare occasion when I highlight a
problem without being able to recommend a practical workaround or solution. All
I can say is that as soon as I get any positive news, I’ll report it.
Contact Ed Perkins at eper...@mind.net.
CONSUMER TRAVEL
ED PERKINS
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "randon" group.
To post to this group, send email to ran...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to randon+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/randon?hl=en.
My anecdotal impression, based on trips to France every year or two
and several extended stays there, is that French businesses, even in
the sticks, have gotten better at accepting magnetic stripe cards, no
doubt because handheld terminals that use both systems have gotten
cheaper and more common. But the original article does point out a
real problem with unattended kiosks, which are only becoming more
common.
Interestingly, many of those kiosks are set up to read magnetic
stripes--for instance, the Vélib' cycle kiosks in Paris. But most
American card processors have refused to allow their cards to be used
in the Vélib' system, probably because it places a €150 hold on the
card as a deposit, and that's a lot of money to charge without any
verification. However, American Express cards with magnetic stripes do
work with Vélib', one of the increasingly few reasons that I keep my
Amex account.
Brian
P.S. The cynical side of me thinks that US banks have not adopted
chip-and-PIN verification because customers can't choose the PIN or
change it; it's hard-wired into the card. I bet the banks think that
there are two possibilities: (1) they'll be deluged by calls from
irate customers who have forgotten their PIN and can't use their card,
or (2) customers will write down the PIN and keep it with the card in
their wallet, thus negating the security advantage.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Roger Peskett <rogerp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But, France, and the UK, for example, are
> different: in those two countries, credit and debit cards are very
> widely used - as much as, or possibly more than, in the USA. (Now all
> chip-and-pin in the UK; I know less about France.)
--
Brian W. Ogilvie <bwog...@gmail.com>
Hadley, Massachusetts, USA
http://homepage.mac.com/brianogilvie/
P.S. The cynical side of me thinks that US banks have not adopted
chip-and-PIN verification because customers can't choose the PIN or
change it; it's hard-wired into the card. I bet the banks think that
there are two possibilities: (1) they'll be deluged by calls from
irate customers who have forgotten their PIN and can't use their card,
or (2) customers will write down the PIN and keep it with the card in
their wallet, thus negating the security advantage.
Well if you look at the reason for the US banks not picking up the chip and Pin – FOLLOW THE MONEY
A mag strip card cost about $2 and chip and Pin cost about $20 – how many US card holders would need a new card
How about the hardware cost
Last the biggest reason for no US banks to join the chip and Pin world is the stop of fraud loss treatment
In the US Bank credit card loss is written off the banks tax at 50% - so you guessed it US Tax payers are giving every credit card thief 50% of our money in lost tax revenue
This is NOT IN PLACE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY
In most non US countries bank regulations allow the bank to charge the customer THE FULL ALL cost of a loss since the thief had to be provided THE ONE AND ONLY working pin number for the pin and Chip card. The logic is that the only place a thief can receive the working pin is from the customer themselves – so the customer is responsible for the loss and the bank saves millions.
In the US there is a law from the 1980 that banks cannot pass this loss onto the customer EVEN WITH the new chip and Pin card.
So there IS NO REASON FOR A US BANK UNDER US LAWS TO EVER GO TO the chip and Pin system
In Germany one bank using the chip and Pin has reduced credit card thief by over 65% - but the bank reduced it out of pocked loss by closer to 95% by passing all losses onto the customer who gave out there pin. So if you do the math in the US – loss down let’s say 50% and write off 50% (net 25%) it is not enough savings to make the move for US BANKS – they would still have a loss and higher operating costs and hardware costs.
Jim House
Maumee, OH
Former Large Bank Tax Officer
--
Preventing fraud is a bank’s responsibility. Next time the US tax payers bail out the banks, perhaps we should first check out their fraud prevention procedures and how much they pass onto tax payers in credit card losses.
Outdated laws before there was available technology to prevent fraud is a poor excuse for banks to not implement better fraud prevention procedures. In the last 2 years, I had my credit card number reassigned twice due to large scale fraud issues. There’s a high operational cost to that too, in addition to a customer confidence loss. And if I can’t use my credit card on my limited travel abroad, a customer service issue too.
Veronica Tunucci
Former and Current U.S Tax Payer
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
I don’t see where one has to do with the other.
Limiting fraud is still beneficial, even if the loss limits passed on to consumers remains the same.
> The bank still monitors your purchases - recently we returned from
> France/Spain and Visa had called to confrim purchases, to ensure no
> fraud.
On that front, my bank suggests letting them know if you will be
travelling so a string of charges in, say France, don't set off the
alarms.
yeah, mine too and I learned the hard way to start asking the credit card company how to contact them from that particular int'l location.
Notified AmEx I was traveling to Grand Cayman this summer. A charge at the grocery store was denied and several $5 phone calls later (not to mention VERY frustratingly slow email responses) that Grand Cayman doesn't permit collect calls. The contact with AmEx was worthless.
Just like randonneuring...always have a backup!
Pam Wright --- On Thu, 8/5/10, Donald Perley <donp...@gmail.com> wrote: |
|
|
|
-----Original Message-----
>From: Bob Kassel <bicyclebob...@yahoo.ca>
>Sent: Aug 5, 2010 3:50 AM
>To: randon <ran...@googlegroups.com>
>Subject: [Randon] Re: US credit card usage woes in Europe
>
>
>Just a couple of comments, having had a chip card (no choice) from a
>Canadian bank for 2 years, and now our debit cards are chipped also:
>The cost of the hardware upgrades are easily paid for by the decrease
>in fraud.
>At no time was there any information from the bank that we are now
>responsible for any fraud.
>The card still has the magnetic stripe so can be used in locations
>with no chip reader.
>The card can still be compromised because you can still use it for
>online stuff, and mail order.
>The bank still monitors your purchases - recently we returned from
>France/Spain and Visa had called to confrim purchases, to ensure no
>fraud.
>I chose my PIN, not the bank.
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "randon" group.
>To post to this group, send email to ran...@googlegroups.com.
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to randon+un...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/randon?hl=en.
>
"Let me tell you what I think of bicycling. I think it has done more to emancipate women than anything else in the world. It gives women a feeling of freedom and self-reliance. I stand and rejoice every time I see a woman ride by on a wheel...the picture of free, untrammeled womanhood."--Susan B. Anthony