As others have pointed out, making sure you spend your off-the-bike
time well is important. Don't stand if you can sit, don't sit if you
can lie down, and don't have your eyes open when you can close them.
Apart from that, I find I don't recover during the ride at all. It
takes me days to recover, which is why I tend to ride non-stop when
possible. A few rest breaks are great, but taking breaks with more
than an hour off the bike doesn't provide much benefit for me. All
that happens is that my legs get stiff, and it is harder to get back
into a rhythm on the bike.
Having ridden four PBPs, the slowest was the hardest. Sure, it was my
first 1200, but I was in better shape back then, never pushed the
pace, and had ridden many 600s. Still, the last few hundred
kilometers were a slog, as I was deeply fatigued even though I had
been sleeping every night, and even took an afternoon nap. My
recovery after the ride also took longer than it did after my other
PBPs.
For me, the total event time appears to determine the fatigue. Riding
with fewer, shorter stops means that my "total event time" is
shorter. I find that my limit for "total event time" is somewhere
around 55 hours. Thereafter, it gets a lot harder. So ideally, the
finish line is in sight at that point.
The alternative is touring at a sustainable pace for no more than
10-12 hours a day. I really enjoy that, but you cannot ride brevets
that way. A brevet is not sustainable for most randonneurs, myself
included, which is why we all slow down on a 1200 compared to a 600.
There is a reason the rules allow for 10 more hours for the 1200 than
they do for two 600s.
Jan Heine
Editor
Bicycle Quarterly
http://www.bikequarterly.com
Follow our blog at
http://janheine.wordpress.com/
--