Thatsaid WF e-commerce can be suitable for clients who do not need complex and comprehensive e-commerce services options. If your client will be an independent artists selling low volume of items, go for WF. But if client will need fully working e-commerce you should be looking somewhere else. Your choice. Look around this forum to find what people are facing and expecting when using WF as e-commerce.
I think ultimately it depends on the integrations and features that you want to include. Foxy is great and has a lot of functionality - but I personally found that I was relying very heavily on Zapier, and even then there were things that were not possible to achieve.
I have just signed up to @foxy. I have configured what I believe is the correct configurations but cannot get the site to work
www.widgeontheatreboat.com and a big message comes up to say not working. I have tried on forum and called USA from UK twice and no reply. I appreciate you guys must be busy but you make it sound like there is easily accesible support and I am finding the opposite. I really need your help.
Yeah everyone keeps saying that and I sincerely appreciate it - but this is really time sensitive and I thought I might get to either speak to someone on the phone (called twice and arranged a call back), Chat support is offline and forum no replies. I have now pinged @foxy within this forum hoping to get an answer.
That's when I realized, none of ROS2 commands and packages work. I can't list topics/nodes. I can't run successfully built packages. I can't interrupt them with CTRL+C. I can only stop them with CTRL+Z. Then I can force kill (just "sudo kill pid" can't kill) the process.
I can run Ros Noetic packages/commands without a problem. And I used to run Foxy commands/packages as well. I realized this 2 days ago but maybe it has been like this before than that. I reinstalled Foxy with:
Are your normal ROS 2 CLI commands working? E.g. ros2 topic list and so on. I remember some time ago when installing ROS 2 Galactic in a new, clean Ubuntu 20.04 my CLI stopped working. I had to reinstall some missing packages for it. Maybe it's similar with RViz2 in your case.
No, they are not working either. They just freeze. As for the workspace, well I only followed the MoveIt tutorial and there was no error. Besides, basic CLI commands should work regardless of the workspace right?
It looks like you need to reinstall ROS2 or try to fix the missing packages manually - the second option is less destructive, so try it first (e.g. with ros-foxy-ros2cli etc.). You can also try with ros2 daemon stop, ros2 daemon start.
Do you have your firewall enabled? A while back I had problems with ROS 2 and Gazebo simulations because it messed up my plugins etc. You can try to sudo apt-get install ros-foxy-... other packages, for me sudo apt autoremove after remove sometimes messed up my packages and I had to install them myself, even with full desktop install from Debian packages
Check out your networking setup, and make sure it is configured properly and has multicast enabled. Many ROS 2 commands won't work properly without multicast.Try running some of the ros2 commands with --no-daemon, like: ros2 topic list --no-daemon.Look for hardware errors in dmesg, and/or reboot the machine and try the tests again.Try running this test again on the same machine, but in a docker container. That can at least tell us if something is misconfigured on the host.
Let me tell you about my first week working at Foxy as a digital marketer and content writer. Being friends with Eva, I knew a little bit about what Foxy did and how the process sort of worked, however, no one could have predicted what was going to happen for that first week. I already knew that I would be joining one of the stylists with an installation then following up with a trip in the truck with Cody and Russ. A full day out and about in Brisbane to see what Foxy was all about.
Recipients: Bubbly drinkers who need to catch a breath, rest and reflect. Maybe they need a reward for a job well done or making it to the end of a working week. We drink Foxy Brown quite a bit. Hehe!
Hi everyone,
This build was planned for the Desert Group Build next year.
However I am going to have to find something else for that because I'm just too excited about this project and I want to initiate it right away.
My plan is to build RAF Tornado GR1B ZA465 which served with 16 Squadron.
It flew 44 bombing missions in Gulf War I (the highest number by any Tornado.)
Her Tail code was FK resulting in 'Foxy Killer' namesake and noseart.
There's loads of reference for gulf war tonkas and a substantial amount for ZA465.
I intend to try to replicate the patchy paint and weathered feel and chipping of the temporary desert paint. I've been reading about the different shades of paint and how it was applied.
I will watch your buid with interesting, as I recently finished 1/72 "Mig Eater" Tonka. You will find here many Tonka lovers (me) and experts (not-me). Thank you for sharing photos, some of them I did't know and they are very interesting with all leaks and paint's chipping. I think you know this page?
I think (I stand to be corrected) that Team A were the day shift, whilst Team B were the night shift or something like that. If you look at most Tornado nose art from that war they nearly all have 2 teams working them.
regarding the gr.4 to gr.1 stuff; the kit comes with a few extra parts on the sprue that i think for the gr.1 ip so those will be used but i'm not going to burden myself with too much correctness, i want to enjoy the bits i enjoy without too much guilt. so some stuff might be a bit wrong.
and i've been fitting the tom anyz knobs and switches. it started trying to be accurate then it veered off a touch and i got less concerned with complete accuracy. the kit itself is great and matches references really well and has good sharp detail. the anyz stuff just lifts it a bit though i broke tons of drills doing it.
I like those seats a lot, you've made them look very good for 'out of the box' items. I might also need to get some of those 'anyz' bits and pieces, which I've not heard of before - my bank manager/credit card will not be impressed! (Nothing new there, so.....)
on another note i got a 'calibre' stand and figured out the perfect device to stick on the end of the sharp legs (to make them ideal and tactile to hold steady my builds without scratching them) works really good ?
Not this kit but I did do the 1/48 Revell kit and fixed the wings at full-forward sweep. Even with the resin exhaust, it still sat on its nose gear without weight in the nose (I'd filled the nose with shotgun pellets prior but didn't need it after all). I suspect yours will be the same.
The buy from jadlam was from ebay and its so difficult to get in touch on ebay with the seller unless one wants to 'just' return them (and postage costs are the same as the decal so its a fruitless task).
The WSO's upper ip and screens have been weathered and installed. I did some minor touch ups on the seats and interior too.(seats are a dry fit temporarily). hud has been completed and shroud dry brushed. and everythings been given a little sandy powder (gulf bird).
The canopies have been masked inside and out (some idiot lost all the masks?!? They have literally disappeared into thin air. ? i have no idea how this happened) so i had to do it oldschool with a cocktail stick, knife and tamiya tape (for the main canopy).
I painted the inside of the glazing with a close approximation to the outside colour first (tamiya wooden deck tan is reaaallly close to tornado desert pink refs). (followed by an overcoat of matt black and matt varnish.)
After a while I feel kind of lonely in the journey of trying to fly a drone using a MOCAP system. with only using fastRTPS and ROS2 Foxy. Currently I can publish and subscribe to the real PX4 over UART as demonstrated in this: _ros_com/issues/38 which I got it to work.
Currently I am trying to send a simple pose to the px4 using vehicle_visual_odometry (VehicleVisualOdometry_PubSupTopic) since vehicle_mocap_odometry (VehicleMocapOdometry_PubSubTopic) is not working with ekf2 according to documentation here: _position_estimation.html -> " EKF2 only subscribes to vehicle_visual_odometry topics and can hence only process the first two messages (a MoCap system must generate these messages to work with EKF2).".
I evaluate vehicle_local_position using listener vehicle_local_position in the nsh>. When I do so while using my vehicle_visual_odometry-advertiser. It seems as if the EKF2 is not incorporating the received topic (vehicle_visual_odometry) in its position estimation:
What you are seeing on the timestamp is that the timestamp after sync is resulting in a timestamp higher than the timestamp on the FMU. Which might result of some skew or data drops on your link. How do you have the bridge setup? By serial? What baud rates? Have you tried to remove unneeded topics from the bridge?
I increased the baud rate to 921600 and activated HW flow control. Not yet removed the topics I am not using (I suppose you mean on the RPI at the workspace directory of the micrortps_agent and not at the firmware / micrortps_client side). However I still have two questions:
I am trying to use CT with FoxyProxy in FF browser, essentially we are using bastions via SSH and I am setting up a tunnel to each bastion then using FoxyProxy to invoke that and allow my browser to access web based resources.
3a8082e126