Incorrect verbiage for gems that don't support Rails 3.0

[jangosteve]

I just added the jquery-rails gem to the site after seeing it
mentioned in @drnic's talk on concurrency. In jquery-rails 2.0, we
removed support for Rails 3.0 and just targeted 3.1 and greater to
simplify the codebase. When you view it on railsplugins.com though, it
says "Broken with Rails 3.0" and "A newer version (1.0.19) is
available for this plugin".

I'm assuming this is due to the lack of support for Rails 3.0 and the
fact that 1.0.19 supports both 3.0 and 3.1. But 1.0.19 is definitely
older, and Rails 3.0 support was intentionally removed, so it's not
broken.

Any chance the page could be updated to say something more along the
lines of:

"Does not support Rails 3.0" and "Another version is available which
supports 3.0", respectively. Likewise, a message should probably be
added to the v1.0.19 page that says a newer version is available and
links to v2.0.

-Steve