What? No discussion regarding the ongoing PR disaster that is Matt's porn presentation
Obie Fernandez
very angry about the fact that this PR disaster has degenerated to the
point of members of this group publicly quitting and denouncing its
leadership.
http://afreshcup.com/2009/04/28/a-painful-decision is making me
So as to not complain without offering solutions, here is my list of
what I think should happen (for discussion):
1) Matt should resign from the Rails activist group
2) If Matt does not understand why what he did and subsequent
non-apology was wrong, then we should be kind enough to explain it to
him
3) With all due respect to DHH and notwithstanding his desire for
Rails to remain "edgy" I think he should apologize for implicitly
endorsing Matt's behavior
Please do flame me, whatever... this needs to be discussed and acted
on before it continues to spiral out of control.
Obie Fernandez
CEO & Founder | Hashrocket
904.435.1673 office
404.934.9201 mobile
Hashrocket, Inc.
320 N 1st Street
Suite 712
Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250
http://hashrocket.com
http://obiefernandez.com
Hashrocket and nGen Works present...
BizConf is the premier conference for principals of custom web
development firms!
August 20-21, 2009 at the beautiful Ritz-Carlton Resort Amelia Island
in North Florida
http://bizconf.org
Robert Dempsey
Sincerely,
Robert Dempsey, CEO
Atlantic Dominion Solutions
http://adsdevshop.com
http://twitter.com/rdempsey
Phone: 321-274-4684
Ben Reubenstein
I am very surprised at how out of control this has gotten. It is
challenging to present some topics, and although some may not agree
with the way in which Matt went, it is his right. I am 100% sure that
Matt was not making any commentary on women in engineering and was
trying to make a topic interesting.
I know that Dana Jones was pretty offended and this spread to Mike
resigining. I think:
1. Mike has made the wrong move. Leaving the community is not the
answer, dialogue is.
2. DHH has made has spoken:
http://loudthinking.com/posts/39-im-an-r-rated-individual
http://loudthinking.com/posts/40-alpha-male-programmers-arent-keeping-women-out
You want to see an inappropriate conference topic, just search C4
drunkenbatman on google.
~ Ben
Reference for those that have not seen the presentation in question:
http://www.slideshare.net/mattetti/couchdb-perform-like-a-pr0n-star
Ben Reubenstein
303-947-0446
Xcellent Creations, Inc.
http://www.x-cr.com
Matt Aimonetti
Rails, and the loss of one of the Activism team. I am just as
frustrated as you are.
I've been working on organizing my thoughts in to a blog entry with
the help of few friends and it should be public later on today (on my
blog).
- Matt
On Apr 28, 12:02 pm, Obie Fernandez <obiefernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As a prominent member of the Rails community and businessperson, I'm
> very angry about the fact that this PR disaster has degenerated to the
> point of members of this group publicly quitting and denouncing its
> leadership.
>
> So as to not complain without offering solutions, here is my list of
> what I think should happen (for discussion):
>
> 1) Matt should resign from the Rails activist group
> 2) If Matt does not understand why what he did and subsequent
> non-apology was wrong, then we should be kind enough to explain it to
> him
> 3) With all due respect to DHH and notwithstanding his desire for
> Rails to remain "edgy" I think he should apologize for implicitly
> endorsing Matt's behavior
>
> Please do flame me, whatever... this needs to be discussed and acted
> on before it continues to spiral out of control.
>
> Obie Fernandez
> CEO & Founder | Hashrocket
> 904.435.1673 office
> 404.934.9201 mobile
>
> Hashrocket, Inc.
> 320 N 1st Street
> Suite 712
> Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250
>
Ali Rizvi
Here is what I found:
http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2009/04/gender-and-sex-at-gogaruco/
http://dyepot-teapot.com/2009/04/25/dear-fellow-rubyists/
http://computer-internet.marc8.com/be-professional-or-be-edgy-how-context-can-keep-everyone-happy
I feel it all started with the F U presentation at Vancouver on Rails but this has gone to far.
I agree with Obie that we need to do something about this and publicly unendorse it.
I don't think an individual's action should be reflected upon the community but remaining silent and defending/endorsing it DHH style is not a good idea.
I am saddened by this turn of event and I think we should do all we can do untarnish our reputation.
Ali
Mike Gunderloy
of the matter. FWIW, she didn't know about my decision to resign
before it happened, nor did she pressure me at all in either direction.
Mike
Miles K. Forrest
Miles
> very angry about the fact that this PR disaster has degenerated to the
> point of members of this group publicly quitting and denouncing its
> leadership.
>
> So as to not complain without offering solutions, here is my list of
> what I think should happen (for discussion):
>
> 1) Matt should resign from the Rails activist group
> 2) If Matt does not understand why what he did and subsequent
> non-apology was wrong, then we should be kind enough to explain it to
> him
> 3) With all due respect to DHH and notwithstanding his desire for
> Rails to remain "edgy" I think he should apologize for implicitly
> endorsing Matt's behavior
>
> Please do flame me, whatever... this needs to be discussed and acted
> on before it continues to spiral out of control.
>
> Obie Fernandez
> CEO & Founder | Hashrocket
> 904.435.1673 office
> 404.934.9201 mobile
>
> Hashrocket, Inc.
> 320 N 1st Street
> Suite 712
> Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250
>
Joe Fiorini
changing, whether we like it or not and we can either change with it
and watch it grow and flourish, or stay as we are and begin the
stagnation. Which will it be?
- Joe
joe fiorini - software craftsman & technologist
bio - http://joefiorini.com
thoughts - http://faithfulgeek.org
Xavier Noria
It's just a handful of slides, they are not even explicit or anything.
I personally find the presentation just original, no offense, and no
offense for woman (meaning, of the woman I personally know I don't
think any of them would be offended).
So I really think there has to be some cross-cultural thing going on.
Ben Reubenstein
I apologize for any assumptions on my part, I just have Twitter and
blog posts to put together a story.
No hard feelings, I just think it is sad that you would choose to
leave. You are a rockstar and so is Dana. I have never seen someone
so helpful on IRC.
~ Ben
Chad Woolley
<mattAi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I really regret that this situation has brought bad publicity to
> Rails, and the loss of one of the Activism team. I am just as
> frustrated as you are.
I really regret your apparent lack of regret.
> I've been working on organizing my thoughts in to a blog entry with
> the help of few friends and it should be public later on today (on my
> blog).
I hope it contains a sincere apology, and is light on ideology. Pick
your battles.
-- Chad
Dana Jones
Thank you (though I don't really feel like much of a rockstar - heh).
I can see where it might appear that I was driving Mike's decisions if
you had only Twitter to go by. The truth of the matter is, he knew
about the GoGaRuCo presentation and fallout long before I did (a side-
effect of his tendency to wake up at ungodly hours). He was offended
all on his own. And I didn't know anything about him leaving Activists
until the die had already been cast - I woke up to the news.
I objected to the images in the slide show not because they are sexist
(though I believe they are), but because they are sexUAL. Some
parallel comparisons just aren't going to sit well with every audience
member out there. And while, granted, you can't please all the people,
all the time, it seems incredibly naive to think there wouldn't be
some fallout from a "developer as porn star" analogous presentation.
Imagine a presentation about recruiting developers for your firm with
the analogous presentation: "Big Game Hunting", replete with pictures
of dead animals smilingly displayed by the hunters who killed them.
Hunting is a perfectly legal sport and one which I personally have no
objections to (just as I have no objections to porn), but do graphic
images that will likely disturb at least *some* audience members
really have a place?
What about a presentation about writing code on deadline: "Delivering
Like a Birth Mom." Or how about graphic images of up-close
breastfeeding in a talk titled "Nursing Your Projects Along."
I have four kids. I breastfed. I've hunted. I even like porn! But two
great tastes don't always taste great together, and that is the point
that so many seem to have failed to make, or to get.
Dana
Gregg Pollack
Regarding Mike, I too am also frustrated to see him go, and I'm still trying to come up with ideas to convince him to stay. Let me know if you have any.
Regarding Matt, he's not the first Rails team member to create offensive slides, fuck no (pardon my french). However, I do know that he regrets that he did offend so many people, so I'm looking forward to hearing what more he has to say on his blog.
In my opinion the real issue here is "What can we do as the Rails community to create an environment that is just as welcoming and friendly to everyone regardless of sex, race, or otherwise." (aside from not creating slide presentations which have the possibility of offending people)
What more do you think we can do?
Gregg Pollack
Obie Fernandez
themselves were funny and/or innocuous.
Here's my summary of what's wrong
1) the presentation made women and conservative folks uncomfortable - BAD
2) the lack of sensitivity or remorse in followup responses by Matt
and DHH, rightfully perceived as leaders of the "Rails community" -
UGLY
3) the implication of the Rails Activism group (and by extension, its
members) as endorsers of porn and insensitivity, amplified by Mike
Gunderloy's resignation - REALLY UGLY
Now many people are unfairly indicting the entire Ruby community as a
breeding ground for misogyny and various others sins and the official
inaction (or aggravation by DHH) is not helping to put an end to it. I
don't think that it's going to blow over anytime soon and is really
not what we want leading up to our biggest event of the year.
Regardless of how trivial we think the initial offense was, I think at
this point it is a PR disaster that needs concerted action to correct.
NOW
Obie
Dana Jones
Speaking only for myself, I've been toying with the idea of mentoring
a local girl (maybe junior high or high school age) into development.
I know that I came to the game (dev) much later than most, largely
because computers seemed scary and foreign and impossibly complicated.
Do girls nowadays still feel that way? Maybe not as many, but the
girls I come into contact with (through other pursuits like martial
arts) still seem to have some kind of techno-fear.
That's only one piece of the puzzle, though, and as you point out the
community needs to be more accepting across the board. I don't have
any answers for that one but am keen to hear others'.
Dana
Pedro Visintin
I will don't judge, because I have my point of view, but if it was a mistake, just dialogue and learn from it.
My 2 cents.
P
Pedro Visintin . S o f t w a r e A r c h i t e c t
http://www.pedrovisintin.com
Ruby On Rails Argentina. http://blogs.onrails.com.ar
Personal page:
http://www.p-e-t-e-r-p-u-n-k.com.ar
"Todo descontento por aquello que no tenemos parece provenir solamente de nuestra falta de gratitud por aquello que tenemos"
Leah Silber
Personal thoughts on what happened aside, the suggestion to "remove"
Matt is a massively overreaching overreaction, and would be a thousand
times more disappointing than what happened. He apologized, many time,
to many people -- subjectively judging the sincerity of that apology
is NOT okay, nor is burning him at the stake.
If the community has issues with demographic imbalances, it's not
Matt's fault, and none of these lines of reasoning are doing anything
to help it. In fact, I've never felt alienated by the community until
all these offended-on-my-behalf men (and the few women) started
telling me how offended I was supposed to be... Whatever the gender
issues are, they've got nothing to do with the quality of the men or
people in the Ruby community. Said it before, will say it again. The
research has been around for a while, it's not exclusive to Ruby.
Check it out if you're interested, but it's an unrelated conversation.
Lastly, I find the generalization that this offended women to be
offensive. It offended *people* -- not women selectively or by any
majority. See? It's a slippery slope and we'd best err on the side of
being open-minded, rather than calling for book (or slide, as it were)
burnings.
-- Leah
Obie Fernandez
archives of this mailing list were open to the world. It was not my
intention to discuss this in public. >:-|
Obie
DHH
speaking on CouchDB. Even if he WAS speaking for Rails, I wouldn't
support this. Given that he wasn't, I find it ridiculous.
> 2) If Matt does not understand why what he did and subsequent
> non-apology was wrong, then we should be kind enough to explain it to
> him
presentation was "wrong". You take that as a foregone conclusion that
because there's disagreement as to whether this was appropriate -- I
totally support a DISCUSSION about whether it's appropriate or not, I
don't support the witch hunt that has ensued -- that it's "as a matter
of fact" wrong. I don't buy into that either.
> 3) With all due respect to DHH and notwithstanding his desire for
> Rails to remain "edgy" I think he should apologize for implicitly
> endorsing Matt's behavior
EXPLICITLY saying it. I'm presenting my personal opinion that I think
the images used in that presentation were incredibly tame (calling it
porn is really an insult to porn) and that the pop culture frame of
"perform as a porn star" felt well within the realm of no big deal.
Again, this is my personal opinion. I'm completely open to having a
discussion about whether that's appropriate or not. What has ensued
has not been a discussion, though, it's been a witch hunt and a pile-
on.
In the comments I've read, I've seen Matt, myself, and anyone else who
dared opine that they didn't think it was out of line to be accused of
supporting human trafficking (wtf?!), implied that someone should
"kick our ass" and that violence would be a good way of teaching us a
lesson, to the regular stable of personal insults like douchebags,
assholes, and more.
This is not proportional. If you were offended by a porn theme or the
tame pictures used in the presentation, it's absolutely your right to
voice your discontent, but this is so far beyond that. What's going on
right now is returning fire from a slingshot with an atom bomb.
> Please do flame me, whatever... this needs to be discussed and acted
> on before it continues to spiral out of control.
drugs and they're working their magic right now. There will not be any
civil discussions possible before the high subsides and people get
some distance. When that day comes, I'll be happy to partake any a
reasonable discussion about rating conference talks or their place.
Obie Fernandez
>
>> 1) Matt should resign from the Rails activist group
>
> Matt wasn't even speaking in a capacity of a Rails activist. He was
> speaking on CouchDB. Even if he WAS speaking for Rails, I wouldn't
> support this. Given that he wasn't, I find it ridiculous.
Members of this group including myself don't find it ridiculous, so
maybe we should find some way of submitting it to a vote or something.
Maybe it's enough for him to issue a real apology, or for the group to
apologize on his behalf. I don't know, nor do I pretend to have all
the answers -- which is why I submitted the topic for group
discussion. Somebody needed to do it, so if you or anyone else think
that I'm out to crucify Matt then just STOP FOR A SECOND and realize
that I like Matt on a personal basis and I'm just trying to find a way
to start putting out this fire.
>> 2) If Matt does not understand why what he did and subsequent
>> non-apology was wrong, then we should be kind enough to explain it to
>> him
>
> Or maybe, just maybe, he didn't think that the tone of the
> presentation was "wrong". You take that as a foregone conclusion that
> because there's disagreement as to whether this was appropriate -- I
> totally support a DISCUSSION about whether it's appropriate or not, I
> don't support the witch hunt that has ensued -- that it's "as a matter
> of fact" wrong. I don't buy into that either.
I think this group SHOULD have a discussion about whether it was
appropriate, but you should acknowledge that your opinions carry
disproportionate weight in this group and the overall community, and
that as a result you're going to tend to dominate the discussion
regardless of whether it's your intention or not.
>> 3) With all due respect to DHH and notwithstanding his desire for
>> Rails to remain "edgy" I think he should apologize for implicitly
>> endorsing Matt's behavior
>
> I'm not implicitly saying that I didn't think it was a big deal, I'm
> EXPLICITLY saying it. I'm presenting my personal opinion that I think
> the images used in that presentation were incredibly tame (calling it
> porn is really an insult to porn) and that the pop culture frame of
> "perform as a porn star" felt well within the realm of no big deal.
> Again, this is my personal opinion. I'm completely open to having a
> discussion about whether that's appropriate or not. What has ensued
> has not been a discussion, though, it's been a witch hunt and a pile-
> on.
Yes, everyone understands your EXPLICIT point. Remember I'm neither
conservative nor particularly professional in how I portray myself
online or in real life. I say FUCK and SHIT a lot, regardless of how
anyone feels about it. I work barefoot and in shorts and a tshirt,
regardless of whether clients are around the office. I endorse heavy
drinking by myself and my friends, hell, if you've seen "The
Hashrocket Way" then you know that I CELEBRATE drinking, not just
endorse it, and I'm sure that is potentially offensive to some people.
I am one of those people that gets called a "rock star" in a
derogative fashion by our critics. In other words, I understand and
SHARE your concern for keeping Rails "edgy" and exciting. This is not
the way to go about it.
I think you're missing the point about what's going on. The PR
situation that concerns me is not about PORN. It's about the lack of
understanding and/or remorse for people's feelings that was displayed
by Matt and subsequently by you. Yes you, who I consider a friend, I'm
calling you out personally. Myself and others think this has
unnecessarily tarnished the image of the activist group and is
damaging the overall reputation of the Ruby community for no good
reason.
> In the comments I've read, I've seen Matt, myself, and anyone else who
> dared opine that they didn't think it was out of line to be accused of
> supporting human trafficking (wtf?!), implied that someone should
> "kick our ass" and that violence would be a good way of teaching us a
> lesson, to the regular stable of personal insults like douchebags,
> assholes, and more.
Sucks to be on the receiving end of that.
> This is not proportional. If you were offended by a porn theme or the
> tame pictures used in the presentation, it's absolutely your right to
> voice your discontent, but this is so far beyond that. What's going on
> right now is returning fire from a slingshot with an atom bomb.
I could be wrong about everything, but not this: Matt could have
defused the whole thing (and probably still can) by just saying he's
sincerely sorry for hurting people's feelings and leave it at that.
You know, like a real apology.
>> Please do flame me, whatever... this needs to be discussed and acted
>> on before it continues to spiral out of control.
>
> It's already out of control. Indignation and outrage are powerful
> drugs and they're working their magic right now. There will not be any
> civil discussions possible before the high subsides and people get
> some distance. When that day comes, I'll be happy to partake any a
> reasonable discussion about rating conference talks or their place.
Do you detect a lot of indignation in this group? Anger, yes.
Pragmatism, yes. Anything else I can't speak to...
Obie
pet3r
> Matt wasn't even speaking in a capacity of a Rails activist. He was
> speaking on CouchDB. Even if he WAS speaking for Rails, I wouldn't
> support this. Given that he wasn't, I find it ridiculous.
capacity of X or Y at a Ruby/Rails event.
Like it or not, you, Matt, Obie, and other guys are leaders of the
community. Of course any leader can ignore this fact, but people (the
community) will still follow (until one pushes it too far, but I'd say
this didn't happen here yet).
> > 3) With all due respect to DHH and notwithstanding his desire for
> > Rails to remain "edgy" I think he should apologize for implicitly
> > endorsing Matt's behavior
>
> I'm not implicitly saying that I didn't think it was a big deal, I'm
> EXPLICITLY saying it. I'm presenting my personal opinion that I think
> the images used in that presentation were incredibly tame (calling it
> porn is really an insult to porn) and that the pop culture frame of
> "perform as a porn star" felt well within the realm of no big deal.
> Again, this is my personal opinion. I'm completely open to having a
> discussion about whether that's appropriate or not. What has ensued
> has not been a discussion, though, it's been a witch hunt and a pile-
> on.
the community will be strongly affected by your opinion. You can't say
"this is my opinion; other guys in the community, think about it and
come up with your own personal version". It just doesn't work like
that. What you are saying matters and it is often perceived as the
voice of he Rails community by outsiders (and sometimes even community
members) and usually works like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
> This is not proportional. If you were offended by a porn theme or the
> tame pictures used in the presentation, it's absolutely your right to
> voice your discontent, but this is so far beyond that. What's going on
> right now is returning fire from a slingshot with an atom bomb.
definition of the problem. Most of the people are still stuck with the
porn pictures, but in fact the problem is in a different dimension:
1) Shit happened (according to a part of the community)...
loop do
2) ...this was pointed out
3) no satisfactory (or downright problematic) answer/solution was
provided
4) the depth of shit is growing thanks to the shit slinging that
ensued...
break if ????!?!!?!
end
Our biggest problem right now is not Matt's talk per se, not even
porn, sexism etc. though these are serious issues too. The problem is
that we can't treat the problem in a satisfactory way, or at least
suggest a plan how might that happen.
> It's already out of control. Indignation and outrage are powerful
> drugs and they're working their magic right now. There will not be any
> civil discussions possible before the high subsides and people get
> some distance. When that day comes, I'll be happy to partake any a
> reasonable discussion about rating conference talks or their place.
apology would do. Let's not even call it an apology. Let's call it
'clarification of things that would make everyone feel OK'.
Peter
DHH
> porn, sexism etc. though these are serious issues too. The problem is
> that we can't treat the problem in a satisfactory way, or at least
> suggest a plan how might that happen.
or track according to the material. The movie standards of PG, M, and
R would do just fine. Then people can self-select on the type of
content that they're willing to hear.
I, for example, can just make sure that I only attend or speak at M
and R rated conferences and tracks. If you're offended by profanity,
for example, you'd be forewarned that sitting in on an M or R track
would be a bad idea.
That's how a movie theater manages to cater to all kinds of people
from all kinds of backgrounds. I think that fits well for this.
Miles K. Forrest
> Our biggest problem right now is not Matt's talk per se, not evenI agree with that. Here's one proposal: Start rating your conference
> porn, sexism etc. though these are serious issues too. The problem is
> that we can't treat the problem in a satisfactory way, or at least
> suggest a plan how might that happen.
or track according to the material. The movie standards of PG, M, and
R would do just fine. Then people can self-select on the type of
content that they're willing to hear.
I, for example, can just make sure that I only attend or speak at M
and R rated conferences and tracks. If you're offended by profanity,
for example, you'd be forewarned that sitting in on an M or R track
would be a bad idea.
Wait. You forgot X, the rating for next-year's RailsConf.
:D
Miles
Brian Burridge
The thing is, wether Matt offended anyone or not, he has the right to say what he wants when he's speaking. And you as an attendee have the right to love it or hate it. You can complain if you want, you can choose to never attend his talks again, or you can applaud him. His freedom to present, your freedom to receive. You can even get up and walk out. But its not your right to try and censor what somebody has to say. If enough attendees complain to a conference, you might persuade the conf to no longer invite that speaker, and if not, then your are in the minority and you have to live with it.
There are an awful lot of people in this day and age who seem to be offended by just about everything...and almost seek a chance to be offended. That's your right, just as much as its Matt's right to use hot chicks to make a point. Personally, I'm glad I live in a country where this kind of freedom exists, and though I could do without some of frequent usage of "colorful" words in RoR talks now days I'm not about to ask for people to step down or be silenced, because I know I can leave, and even stop attending if need be.
If you think the information should be presented without content that offends you, then do so, and be such a fantastic presenter that more people attend your talks than those you find offensive. This has nothing at all to do with the RoR community. You can find a way to be offended in anything you do, from anyone you are around, in anything you watch, or in anything you read, but thankfully, you have the freedom to choose who to be around, what to do with your time, what to watch and what to read. You can also choose which web framework to use, and the framework you choose is independent of the presentation content provided at any conference or the language and styles used by any presenters.
Brian Burridge
www.twitter.com/@bburridge
Rowan Malling
contract with anyone. It's open source. Everyone can do/say/publish
what they like. And that's great, that's gotten us this awesome
framework, and this awesome community.
As someone who is a big champion of Rails - and I think this is
certainly echo'd in people that have to actively "sell in" Rails,
*perception is reality* until you've demonstrated a working
application. At that point results speak for themselves.
However until you've gotten to the results part - What happens when a
business stakeholder, at the sell-in stage, goes and Googles and finds
these kinds of things ? They have no material bearing on whether Rails
is productive or not, we all know this, it's irrelevant of course. But
every little stumbling block that you get faced with is one you don't
need some days.
If you go to an R rated conference track and have an "edgy"
presentation, all well and good, but as soon as it get's published
hits Google, it's not R rated any longer, it's mainstream and fodder
for the nay sayers. The movie analogy falls down there.
So to the custodians, and by that I really mean people who are
publicly visible (or intending on being publicly visible by doing
something equally edgy), please take this as food for thought.
I for one, want to see more Rails use in businesses grow. The more
problems people tackle, solve, and share the more we all benefit.
Cheers
Rowan
Jim Puls
This didn't make it to the slides posted on the web, but at the
conference, Josh did make a point of warning the audience about the
content before Matt gave his presentation. Maybe that has something to
do with why there wasn't a whole lot of (obvious) negative response in
the room at the time.
We've already addressed the problem of "who was offended by the
presentation?", but perhaps a more interesting question is this: why
was the presentation so offensive? Was it the content? The audience?
The lack of a disclaimer? The whole thing being taken out of context
when the slides hit the web by themselves?
-> jp
Ryan Bates
speaking up sooner considering I'm in the Activism group.
Matt is a very respectable developer, and I am certain he did not
intend to offend anyone with his presentation. However, it was
controversial enough to be the tipping point into this fiasco. No
doubt Matt will be more cautious next time to avoid offending.
More of us seem to have an issue with DHH's response. We all know DHH
is very opinionated, and in that is his strength. I guarentee you will
not agree with all of his opinions - I know I don't. But that does not
matter. Nowhere did I see DHH speaking for the Rails community, he
only spoke for himself.
DHH opinion != Rails community opinion, especially on non-technical
issues. Until we grasp that concept Rails will not grow.
We all make up the Rails community, and from the outside all this
bickering looks pretty immature and hurts our image. Please, I'm
asking you to take a more mature stance. Avoid the knee jerk
reactions, and if you get offended, let it cool for an hour before
posting your response. We are all programmers, and programmers are
problem solvers. Let's try to solve this problem in a constructive
manner.
Thanks,
Ryan
dp_ludwig
I disagree.
DHH's opinions do matter. As a kind of spokesman, he needs to be more
cognizant
of that, because whatever he says will be heard from a large chunk of
the Rails
community.
I will grant he has a right to voice opinions on political or non
technical matters as much
as the next person. BUT - doing so risks putting off or offending a
portion of the Rails
community.
Offending parts or segments of the open source community defeats the
point - Rails
will meet its full potential only if the full force of the entire
community's expertise - and
ingenuity - is behind Rails evolution and development.
People change employment because they may find the corporate culture
or people not
to their liking. Let's hope the same kind of thing doesn't happen
here within the Rails
community. As much fun as Rails is, there will always be other tools,
perhaps even
better than Rails. Far fetched? Not at all - that's the beauty of
software development.
Unfortunately, I think DHH will be DHH. I'd be surprised if he
changed from the things
I've seen...
bmctigue
topic.
Every single day we see in the news someone getting offended by
something and demanding apologies, etc. Let's make one thing
absolutely clear: Matt cannot offend anyone, you CHOOSE to be
offended. YOU control what you think and feel, no one else can. Why
should Matt apologize because you've chosen to be offended by some
very tame sexual images. (I have to agree with DHH on that. If this
were a movie, I think it could only rate a PG). One criteria I have
for deciding to do something or not is whether what you do hurts
yourself or someone else. Sex (or suggestions of sex) between
consenting adults is not harmful, sorry. Is Matt sorry for giving the
presentation? I wouldn't be. I have no control over how anyone
responds and look at the exposure his talk has received!
My $.02.
Bruce
Matt Aimonetti
patrickmkenney
Rails is a great framework that speaks for itself. If you're offended
by an opinionated Rails developer enough to be driven to another
framework.....have fun in Cake or ASP.NET and good riddance.
Thank DHH and Matt for their invaluable contributions to the community/
framework that make our lives easier and get back to writing great
apps.
-PK
On Apr 28, 9:26 pm, Matt Aimonetti <mattaimone...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is my official statement:http://merbist.com/2009/04/28/on-engendering-strong-reactions/
>
> - Matt
>
AkitaOnRails
cents as an activist.
First of all, all we are doing here is just adding more fuel to this
fire. There is nothing that we can say right now to make it stop. Even
if Matt apologizes, the pundits will keep on going saying stuff like
"aha, now he apologizes, but we are sure he doesn't really mean it".
But rest assured that it will go away very fast. No one will be
talking about this in a couple of days.
From what I understand, it all started with a couple of blog posts and
tweets about Matt's presentation from very few offended people (people
get offended too easily nowadays). Because of the inflamatory nature
of those posts, it soon wreaked havoc all over the blogosphere,
scalating very fast. Add DHH's posts and our own public manifestations
to that, and you have a sudden surge of random reactions. That's how
riots begin.
Those who are actively trying to burn the "ruby community" or whatnot
are the pundits that are used to troll anyway, they will hold up to
any little thing as a reason to start ranting again. It is the same as
hooligans: there is no reasoning with them.
That said, I don't think Matt apologizing will do any good in the
general matter of things. We are witnessing a riot, not a democratic
discussion in a closed room with a moderator. Neither I think any of
us should be publicly apologetic or anything like that. The only thing
that will make this go away is for all of us activists to simply
ignore the noise. If someone is actually willing to discuss it and
asks any of us our opinion, then maybe we can address them in private.
Unfortunately there is no sending the SWAT team with gas to make this
riot stop, so the only thing to kill a fire without water is to stop
putting more fuel to it. It will go away very soon and no one will
remember about it. I think DHH could've make this shorter by not
blogging :-) But, heck, what the hell, I don't disagree with the
content either. I would hate anyone telling me what to write or say,
so I won't do it as well.
About the specifics, Matt's slides are not offensive. That is "a"
opinion, not "the" opinion. My personal opinion. Contrary opinions are
also valid. What more, this is also a matter of culture and locale. In
Brazil, people would barely notice, even with women in the room. And I
am not saying that we are pro-sexysm, not at all (foreigners do have
this idea about latin americans, though). Seriously, there are much
more explicit stuff broadcasted in the public TV network here, in the
afternoon, than those few slides. And guess what: most of the trolls
ranting online have not even seen those slides, they are just
repeating what others are saying. As I said, this is not a moralistic
discussion, this is just a matter of who yells louder.
I think most of us know Matt and we know for a fact that he is not a
sociopath or anything like that, so we gain nothing with him out. On
the contrary, we lose a lot. If we apply censorship once, people will
demand it again later for much less, and all of a sudden we are
trapped. And we don't need to, as far as no one is breaking the laws,
we are free to do whatever we please. Are there boundaries? Sure, but
they are not written on stone and no one can assume what the other
should or should not know, specially in a globalized environment. We
get no rules manual when we sign in. We learn from our mistakes, we
discuss it friendly, and if it were really a mistake, next time it
won't happen.
And leaders are not supposed to be perfect. Leaders are also not
supposed to do whatever the public demands. I can make a roster of
known leaders with very nasty backgrounds - we all know them -, and
they are still considered good leaders. History will judge (though we
all know that history is written by those who were victorious).
Now, people leaving Rails because of what DHH say? The Rails community
dismantling because of a statement? Hardly. Some people will agree,
some will disagree, no matter what. Some people would like to see DHH
quiet, some people would claim for DHH to rant some more. He won't be
able to please everyone even if he decides to disappear. The pundits
will say "DHH's been too quiet lately, I bet he is leaving the
community, Rails is doomed as we've foreseen". Pundits will be pundits
no matter what.
If people stick with Rails just because of some people's opinion, I
would recommend them to reflect about it. Most of the real Railers
stick with Rails because of the community in general, not one single
individual. When Linus Torvalds said that "subversion is the most
pointless project ever", I doubt that the subversion fans left Linux.
They stick with Linux because of the technology and the community as a
whole, not because they particularly like Linus. I advocate open
source, but I am not very fond of Stallman. That's how communities are
anyway.
Well, sorry for the long text, I still don't know how to control my
writing :-)
