raft-dev

Something like this (see "In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm" §8 for

To make a value persistent means writing it to disk and waiting for an fsync to complete. This takes

Hi Diego and Jesse, > Scale's build system probably just reached in and grabbed those client

Hi Diego. Thanks for replying. So we can say that the leaders of T+1, T+2, ..., U-1 (if those terms

Hi, Has anyone tried to run the raft cluster formation across two or more k8s clusters? There are two

Hi, I have initialized a raft node and added 2 peers one-by-one. While the first peer is added, the

You should have just one node at first and add the other two one by one later to the cluster. On

Don't call Bootstrap if there is pre-existing state. Just called NewRaft, and pass it the

Thanks! On Tuesday, October 29, 2024 at 5:17:29 PM UTC-7 Philip O'Toole wrote: You just call

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 5:10 PM Diego Ongaro <onga...@gmail.com> wrote: You've linked to

Reading committed values (even stale) may sometimes be ok but there may be an issue if the client who

That makes sense. Pipelining is a significant benefit! Thanks, Andy! M. On Tuesday, October 1, 2024

1. If the leader comes back online before the election timeout is exhausted on the followers then it

The state machine's idempotency is critical here since RAFT cannot guarantee exactly-once command

Hi saurabh ratna, Since that sounds very specific to the braft implementation, you might want to ask

For a crashed node, we can assign it a new UUID and use reconfiguration to remove the one with old

Actually, I have only a purpose is performance analysis for raft and PoW consensus protocols. As a

Yup my bad, thank you for the clarification! Will it be safe to assume that the persistent state

Sorry if what I said was ambiguous... The majority *may* include the leader, but doesn't have to,

On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 2:58 PM H Wang <howard.w...@gmail.com> wrote: a fresh new S1,

I'm just sending a brief follow up here. Dong confirmed (off-list) that the mp4 is accessible

Replicated logs should use the original term number. It is not safe to change them to the new term

Hi Dongbin, I'll begin with a disclaimer that I've forgotten many of Raft's details, so

Wrap your TLS Listener (and Dialer) in this interface: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/hashicorp/raft#

If a voter that has the most recent logs, ie, greatest `(last_term, last_log_index)`, and can not

The way I see it, if an empty log node manages to get a majority, some of the raft properties would

On Sunday, January 7, 2024 at 8:25:10 PM UTC-6 Pablo Pessolani wrote: In this case, the Candidate

Hi all, This is to inform that the issue has been resolved. We need to keep only one version of

You said two different things: (a) avoiding where "two nodes can lead at the same time" and

Thanks Diego -- this is an interesting list to be part of, and it was a pity to see it being abused.