Ishihara Tokyo governor plans to build a nuclear plant along Tokyo bay

0 views
Skip to first unread message

selected by Rael

unread,
May 16, 2012, 8:28:23 AM5/16/12
to rael-s...@googlegroups.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/05/ishihara-tokyo-governor-plans-to-build-a-nuclear-plant-along-tokyo-bay/

Ishihara Tokyo governor plans to build a nuclear plant along Tokyo bay

Posted by Mochizuki on May 12th, 2012 · 4 Comments

Having received the petition of 320,000 people for referendum of nuclear power, Ishihara Tokyo governor mentioned the plan to build a nuclear plant along the coast of Tokyo bay.

He believes Fukushima plants were damaged by Tsunami, suggests to build one on the mountain in Chiba.
He stated Mt. Nokogiri yama in Chiba is 329m of height, 1km from Tokyo bay so it can take water from Tokyo bay for its coolant system.
Ishihara mentioned this plan at Metropolitan Assembly budget Committee on 3/14/2012 at first but local residents opposed the plan. Ishihara commented, it was merely an idea for civilization, but he won’t apologize.

 
東京都の石原慎太郎知事(79)が11日、東京湾岸での原発建設プランをあらためて打ち出した。原発是非の住民投票を求める32万人余りの署名が東京都に提出されたことを受け、持論を展開。福島第1原発事故は津波が原因で起きたことに触れ「私は原発を山の上に造った方がいいと思う。極端に言えば、東京湾でもできる。鋸山(のこぎりやま、千葉県)の上だったら、空き地はたくさんある。あそこに造れば、津波は届かない」と話した。

千葉県富津市と鋸南(きょなん)町の境には、鋸山という標高329メートルの山がある。東京湾から1キロ余りと近く、海から冷却水を取れる。今年3月14日の都議会予算委員会でこのプランを明かし、地元は反発。「1つの文明論として言っただけ。何の釈明もしない」と話していた。住民投票を求める署名が大量に集まったことには「議会で議論すればいい」と語った。

 


大きな地図で見る

 
Source



Fukushima Diary is against media blackout. Only donation keeps it alive.
日本の窮状を世界に。
Fukushima Diary
は寄付でなりたってます。 

Thank you for your donation ご寄付ありがとうございます。
 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to believe
that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when I select
articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish, racist,
revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group or religion, or any
other stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It just
means that it is important for all human beings to know about them.
Common sense, which is usually very good among our readers, is good
enough to understand that. When, like in the recent articles on drug
decriminalization, it is necessary to make it clearer, I add a comment,
which in this case was very clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs,
as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad people (as only depressed and
sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin their life with a criminal
record. That does not mean that there is any change to the Message which
says clearly that we must not use any drug except for medical purposes.
The same applies to the freedom of expression which must be absolute.
That does not mean again of course that I agree with anti-Jews,
anti-Semites, racists of any kind or anti-Raelians. But by knowing your
enemies or the enemies of your values, you are better equipped to fight
them. With love and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence
of the French philosopher Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you
say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages