--
THIS IS THE "RADIO OFFICERS, &C" MAIL LIST - UNSUBSCRIBE AND OTHER SETTINGS ARE BELOW.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Radio Officers" group.
To post to this group, send email to radio-o...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to radio-officer...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/radio-officers?hl=en
If it's anything like NavRadSta Jim Creek, Oso, Washington, it would have been transmitting at 18.5 or 23 khz at extremely high power (megawatts of output), which would have wiped out your receives pretty effectively if you were close enough.
Bryan
NXFN / NRUO / NMW43 / NMC / NLVS / NYCQ / NBTM / NRV / NMEL / NHWR --- On Mon, 3/1/10, Spud Roscoe <spudr...@eastlink.ca> wrote: |
NAA/Cutler only transmits slow speed teletype.
High baud rates or high data transmission rates can't be used at VLF. The bandwidth required would be a significant percentage of the operating frequency. The antenna SWR would skyrocket at high data rates due to the Q of such an array.
A few years back while on vacation in Maine, I drove up to the station and gaped at the hugeness of NAA's array. It went to the horizon from where I was standing. The area is also extremely isolated with nothing but little villages for miles in any direction.
I then drove up to the main gate, asked if tours were possible and the military guards gave me a curt "NO". Apparently tours are NEVER possible, except perhaps if one is a U.S. Senator on the military appropriations committee...
:-)
I thought NAA was scheduled for closure. However, from the website info offered, it seems like they poured a lot of money into revamping the antenna insulators just last year. Apparently the cold war isn't yet cold enough...it's the site of last resort to get the order out to the sub fleet for the doomsday launch...
Methinks it might be on the opposite sides top ten target list. I might want to rethink buying that cottage in upper Maine...
:-)
By the way, similar bandwidth problems occur, to a lessor extent, on the AM broadcast band. Modern AM broadcast transmitters are capable of transmitting a flat audio response from 50 to at least 10,000 HZ, nearly the practical equivalent of an FM transmitter. However, the antenna array for an AM broadcast station can be a problem, limiting the upper audio range.
I used to work at a New Haven AM station WELI, 5KW on 960 KHz. The station uses a single tower during the day and goes to a 4 tower directional array at night for pattern control. During the day, I could get away with injecting a steady 10KHz tone into the transmitter. Even then, on a single tower, SWR would jump up to about 2:1, the transmitter's limit. If I tried that at night, the SWR protect would trip out the transmitter. It's difficult to obtain a low enough Q to maintain a broadband response in a multi-tower array unless one greatly sacrifices efficiency.
73,
Doug/WA1TUT
When I was RM3 in the then-newly delivered USCGC POLAR SEA (WAGB 11) in Seattle, our radio crew were given a rare tour at Jim Creek. It's been about 35 years, so my memory isn't all it could be, but I remember that there were capacitors bigger than 55-gallon oil drums, that the building was only big enough to hold two of the giant transmitters, that the operating frequencies were 18.5 kHz and 23 kHz (low-speed teletype), and that the antenna array included a 1/2-mile long longwire stretched between two mountain ridges over a valley. The RF output was so great that much of that valley was bare of vegetation, and there were grounding straps for each car in the parking lot. Not only that, the architecture of the transmitter building reminded me of the Emerald City of Oz; there were lightning bolts on the floor of the
transmitter room (if I remember correctly), the walls were a darker color, and the housings of the two giant transmitters were a light green color; technicians could walk inside these behemoths through full-sized, insulated doors with windows in them. A really surreal-looking place. |
--- On Mon, 1/3/10, vk...@wia.org.au <vk...@wia.org.au> wrote:
> From: vk...@wia.org.au <vk...@wia.org.au>
> Subject: [Radio Officers, &c] NAA Cutler Maine VLF TX
Clive GW3WEQ
--- On Tue, 2/3/10, jerry...@sympatico.ca <jerry...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> From: jerry...@sympatico.ca <jerry...@sympatico.ca>
> Subject: RE: [Radio Officers, &c] NAA Cutler Maine VLF TX
> To: radio-o...@googlegroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, 2 March, 2010, 14:06
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the update. If ELF is shut down, is there an
> alternate system in use?
>
> Regards,
> Jerry Proc VE3FAB
> E-mail: jerry...@sympatico.ca
>
> Web : http://jproc.ca
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:53:14 +0000
> From: msta...@comcast.net
> To: radio-o...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Radio Officers, &c] NAA Cutler Maine VLF
> TX
>
>
>
> #yiv1024507127 .ExternalClass
> {height:100%;color:#000000;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial;}
>
> The US Navy's ELF Transmitter was at Clam Lake,
> Wisconson:
>
> http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/c3i/fs_clam_lake_elf2003.pdf
>
> It has been decommisioned and is now shut down.
>
> Mike N2MS
>
>
>
>
>
>
I didn't think to check for labels!
|
|