> But I was really expecting that the option -t in the racket command should
> replace the explicit (require…) in B.rkt. Something like
>
>> racket -t A.rkt -f B.rkt
> default-load-handler: expected a `module' declaration, but found something
> else
Yes that almost works, but A.rkt needs to provide things for the
require to get them.
Also, I guess we need --lib racket (maybe my -I racket was a mistake):
> racket --lib racket -t A.rkt -f B.rkt