Thank you, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, for expressing this.
I am an "ordinary" Racket user - I don't hack on Racket itself, I don't
even create DSLs (yet). But I care about Racket a lot, I tell people about
it, I write software in it, and I even contributed a small feature to a
racket package.
I was glad to see the Apology email on the list. I think this is a good
first step. And I very much understand this is a difficult situation.
But I agree there is a crucial next element that is needed: a clear strategy
on handling these issues in the future, a commitment to addressing the
problem in addition accepting it exists.
There are two links I would like to share:
The Racket Friendly Environment Policy:
https://racket-lang.org/friendly.html
It says:
> Unacceptable behavior will not be tolerated.
(Where unacceptable behavior is defined it a page linked from the Policy.)
And a blog post I saw the other day on Software Freedom Conservancy's blog:
https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2021/apr/20/how-to-apologize/
I think it has many constructive points.
Best,
--
Yury Bulka
https://mamot.fr/@setthemfree
#NotOnFacebook