On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Matthew Butterick <
m...@mbtype.com> wrote:
> 1) Would you consider a PR (from me) for `parser-tools` that updates the
> names to be consistent (while preserving the older ones of course)? Or is
> there too much water under the bridge to bother with?
Sure, cleaning up stuff like that sounds quite welcome. And the parser
tools could use a lot of clean up, I believe. They are kind of strange
and klunky compared to modern racket.
> 2) Relatedly: is the field ordering used by the `srcloc` struct — line /
> column / position / span — recommended for other interfaces to follow, or
> considered arbitrary?
I would probably say "both".
Robby