Afternoon Version

[Gabelo Camphire]

Uponsitting down at our round table by the window, adorned with green plants left and right, and the usual ritual of studying the afternoon tea menu (where everything is already selected for you except for the type of tea), we are asked about our personal tea preference.

Upon inspection of the tea leaves inside the pot, it was immediately apparent that too many had been used in relation to the amount of water. Clearly the emphasis of Il Pampero was not the tea in afternoon tea, but rather the afternoon. An afternoon filled with Italian delights.

The savoury bites adventure was a diverse and appetizing experience. We were able to enjoy a creamy burrata (fresh Italian cheese made from mozzarella and cream) with avocado, a classic bruschetta (grilled bread rubbed with garlic and topped with olive oil, salt and diced tomatoes), refreshing melon covered with Parma ham, and mushroom and truffle, as well as pea and saffron arancini (stuffed rice balls coated with bread crumbs and deep fried).

In my experience so far, afternoon teas tapping into different cuisines make a nice change to the finger sandwiches traditionally served, because as delicious and gratifying as those can be, they still remain within the category of sandwiches. New flavour profiles can be explored, and enticing combinations celebrated. Although afternoon tea is easily a good excuse for indulging in a sea of sweets, the savoury part is usually the food I am most excited about, having arrived hungry and ready to dive in.

ABC is considering handing hosting duties of the afternoon version to people other than Robin Roberts and George Stephanopoulos, the regular lead hosts of Good Morning America. The most likely candidates are Laura Spencer and Josh Elliott, who regularly sit on the GMA couch alongside Roberts and Stephanopoulos in secondary roles.

The afternoon version of the show will run from July, when The Chew ends, through the September launch of the Katie Couric-hosted Katie. According to an ABC spokesperson, GMA in the Afternoon will be taped immediately following the regular GMA telecast, which ends at 9 a.m. EST weekdays . Although it will share the same studio, producers, writers and crew as GMA, it is unknown if it will have a similar budget.

What is known is that the afternoon GMA is expected to specialize in lighter fare, such as entertainment and lifestyle reports, which might lend itself more to Spencer than Elliott as the lead anchor.

GMA will decide on a case-by-case basis if it will do extended interviews with big-name morning guests to provide additional material for airing during the afternoon version. It will depend on the guest, the topic and their availability.

One other possible difference: The afternoon edition might call upon ABC News personnel who are not regulars on GMA. That is especially likely to be true if there is major breaking news and the network does extra programming or goes live during the afternoon period.

This comes at a time when GMA has narrowed the gap with Today for the morning ratings lead after many years of effort. The afternoon show is seen as another way to promote the GMA brand and to reach viewers who might not be available in the morning or who historically have watched Today or other shows.

The song was originally released on The Moody Blues' 1967 album Days of Future Passed, a concept album chronicling a typical day. On the album, it was part one of "The Afternoon" track titled "Forever Afternoon (Tuesday?)". Justin Hayward said that he wrote the song on a Tuesday afternoon in Lypiatt Park, in western England near Stroud. Hayward's mother had taken him and his brother to the park while they were growing up, and he revisited the park during the production of Days of Future Passed to write the song.[2] He said that he wrote the song "with guitar and joint in hand".[3]

Allmusic critic Richie Unterberger describes the lyrics as being "of a youthful contemplative sort coming to a philosophical realization that helps him get that much closer to the meaning of life."[4] According to Unterberger, the song has a "strong melody and a dignified presentation."[4] The instrumentation features a prominent Mellotron.[4]

Justin Hayward wrote the song originally intending to name it "Tuesday Afternoon". At the insistence of producer Tony Clarke, it was named "Forever Afternoon (Tuesday?)" for its release on Days of Future Passed. However, when it was released as a single a year later, its name was changed back to "Tuesday Afternoon". Some of the Moody Blues compilation and live albums list the song as "Tuesday Afternoon (Forever Afternoon)" to reflect both titles.

"Tuesday Afternoon" was released as a single in 1968 and was the second single from Days of Future Passed (the first being "Nights in White Satin"). It was backed with another Days track, "Another Morning".

On Days of Future Passed, the London Festival Orchestra performs the final orchestral rendition of the chorus. This orchestral link between parts one and two of the song was recorded separately from the Moodies' portions. The link was arranged by Peter Knight, who arranged orchestral sections for the entire album. However, for the single release and subsequent releases on compilation albums, this orchestral finale was not included and the song simply faded out during Ray Thomas's flute solo.[4] The Moody Blues 1994 compilation album, Time Traveller, marked the first time the orchestral link was included on a compilation. Its release on 1998's Anthology also included the first-portion orchestral finale.

It seems to be a silly question but I was puzzled when somebody bid me good night, when I wasgoing to sleep at 1:00 PM. If somebody goes to sleep in the afternoon, is it correct to bid him "good night"? I think this is wrong.

Also, you can use "good night" for situations other than going to sleep. I often hear it used when people go their separate ways after spending some time at night together, they say "good night" as they are parting.

Although it's true that, as FrustratedWithFormsD correctly pointed out, "good night" may be used for reasons other than wishing "a good night's sleep", it is also true that normally people sleep at night and for this reason we have a specific expression which also covers this activity.

Because most people don't go to sleep when the sun sets, instead going to sleep hours later (or near sunrise for college students..), the phrase "good night" has a colloquial meaning more along the lines of "have a good sleep", but it is shorter and easier to say.

I wouldn't find fault with good night. The relevance of where the sun is in the sky has dwindled somewhat with our recent globalization. Furthermore, the situation could involve near-polar timezones or perhaps speaking (in English, of course) with someone in a place like China, which has a single timezone despite covering a large amount of longitude.

The connotation of good night with sleep is out of usage. It just is a shortened form of "May you have a good night." So if someone were to sleep at 1 PM, the parting phrase could be

I'm an Australian and as such am known to play with words and phrases. I find going to sleep at any time would be worthy of a "goodnight" as a playful aknowledgement, as well as 2 or more people going their separate ways. Still, two people sleeping together may say goodnight to each other as they both sleep in their respectrive head/body. This is often shortened to goonight (no 'D'').

In addition to the ability to add a task, I would like to add an editable subheader such as Morning or Afternoon or a specific period of time. The daily tasks would then be placed in the right time slot. This would allow the list and board functions to work as a daily agenda in rough form where exact times are not as important and fixed slots for tasks until done, which is common in knowledge work. This is fixed scheduling productivity rather than a to do list approach. It would make software like Google Calendar unnecessary for daily work.

I think this would be a popular feature for individual work in particular and drive users to this app as the addition of the Asana board view made my use of Trello obsolete as ASANA has better task management functions. The subheading feature would make my daily plan agenda obsolete in other apps.

I believe you can achieve this using Sections. Sections allow you to divide and organize the tasks in your project and if you wish to automate which tasks are added to each section you can try creating Rules.

Dear Emily, Thank you for your response. Subheadings would divide up a SECTION by putting dividers between tasks. Think of a daily agenda where you would schedule tasks throughout your day before lunch, after a meeting etc. The work you have for a day is a SECTION you would call TODAY. Tasks completed would be marked done and tasks you did not finish would stay in the TODAY SECTION. You would plan your tasks around the time periods or events of the day that you could label with headings. Unfinished tasks could be moved to a later subheading or moved to another SECTION called IN PROGRESS like the KANBAN method.

If it is, such a basic function should be in the free version to attract those who plan their day chronologically or tasks around event. Calendars like Google are not useful because my tasks are knowledgework that is not fixed to the hour but gets done in sequence with broad categories like before or after lunch or before I go home, or in the evening. I moved to ASANA from TRELLO when ASANA added the board view, which made TRELLO obsolete since ASANA has better task management functions. They could improve the design of the board view, however. It is pretty bland compared to TRELLO.

I took your suggestion and just made cover images with a colored background and the names I needed with not text, and just copied them to slide in later when need. I can store the subheadings in an unused SECTION and slide them around when needed. It should be an unnecessary workaround for such a simple function though.

3a8082e126