On 29 February 2016 at 23:36:34, Cameron Paige (
golfbal...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Logically, I looked at switching to SSL for encryption but it's
> asking me to provide a path to the private key. My issue is that
> my client's enterprise CA won't provide me with a private key
> and even if they did, they wouldn't let me store that key on the
> server. So one thing I tried was disabling 5672 on the external
> interface and only allowing communication from within the local
> host since that's all our custom application requires. Unfortunately,
> it's still coming back with the vulnerability on the scan.
Having node-local private keys is certainly not unheard of even in pretty paranoid environments.
We’ve heard that in some countries, financial regulations requires this (as opposed to loading keys over the network).
You could use x509 certificates only for authentication but server key would still have to be loaded
from a local FS.
--
MK
Staff Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ