Explained Variance

[guna...@umn.edu]

Hi,

When I obtain the explained variance incorporating an adjacency matrix to a BYM2 model, I get the explained variance as below,

variance_component   RR01

1      id_year (iid) -0.755

2   id_year2 (Besag)  0.755

3                ID2  0.766

4                ID2  0.234

ID2 is the adjacency  matrix, I think one value for precision and one value for Phi? Can you please explain why I am getting a negative -0.755 for id-year and 0.755 for Besag? 

Thanks

Umanga

[Helpdesk]

that sounds not possible. it depends likely on how you computed it


On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 03:53 -0700, 'guna...@umn.edu' via R-inla

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "R-inla discussion group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to r-inla-discussion...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/r-inla-discussion-group/f6d8868c-339f-409c-8773-dd50adf11dd3n%40googlegroups.com
> .

--
Håvard Rue
he...@r-inla.org