From the philosifical point of view, 'empirical bayes' is pretty bad or
maybe close to as bad as it can get, as the 'implicite prior' is a point
mass at the mode and all uncertainty are ignored. Variational Bayes is
not even defined for this...
its is very handy if your model contains critical parameters which are
influencial for the model, like the tail-index/parameter for extremes.
including the uncertainty can make a huge impact for predictions, so if
you ignore it, it will be an easier sell... well, that was a joke, but I
think this is the way many sees it, without saying it clearly.
the additional cost of not doing 'eb' is quite moderate, so there is
less to gain computationally these days
if the uncertaintay is small, there is little difference, which can
justufy using 'eb' but there are no formal justifcation in general
H
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "R-inla discussion group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
r-inla-discussion...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/r-inla-discussion-group/a5baa746-615b-4b44-822b-3ecf9d6d1ea2n%40googlegroups.com
> .
--
Håvard Rue
he...@r-inla.org