You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to R-inla discussion group
Hi,
I don't know whether it is highly relative to R-INLA group but I am doing some LGM simulations with known true parameters and realize some values/observations and trying to uncover the true parameters.
I want to apply the penalized complexity priors on those parameters. How can I specify the hyperpriors so that the mean of the PC prior distribution equals to the true parameters of the LGM that generates those observations?
Best,
B
Helpdesk
unread,
Jun 9, 2022, 5:00:07 AM6/9/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Bowen He, R-inla discussion group
the pc-priors is only worked out for some parameters, like precision,
correlations, and so on. do you mean the fixed effects ? for these you
can use Gaussian priors, which should do well
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to R-inla discussion group
I want to set up the PC prior for besagproper2 CAR random effect. And I have some true precision parameter value and the lambda value. How can I set up the hyperprior parameters so that my true parameters are the hyperprior's mean?