--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R-inla discussion group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to r-inla-discussion...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to r-inla-disc...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/r-inla-discussion-group.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to r-inla-discussion-group+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to r-inla-discussion...@googlegroups.com.
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R-inla discussion group" group.To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to r-inla-discussion...@googlegroups.com.To post to this group, send email to r-inla-disc...@googlegroups.com.Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/r-inla-discussion-group.For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Hi,
How about an index argument in inla.posterior.sample() specifying
which elements of the latent field should be stored. Would be
great to have it passed and used by inla.qsample(), reading in
memory only the desired part.
Another option would be to have a 'lincomb' A matrix as an
argument as an option to retur Ax, the desired function of the
latent field.