Windows version
0 views
Skip to first unread message
KiraCatgirl
Mar 3, 2009, 9:11:38 AM3/3/09
to Qwit
The "winxp" version works perfectly well in Vista. I think we should
either label it a windows XP+Vista version or copy it to a Vista
version file so people who use Vista know they can use it too. I
noticed we aren't officially supporting Windows anymore, but if we
have it and it works we should mention the fact!
either label it a windows XP+Vista version or copy it to a Vista
version file so people who use Vista know they can use it too. I
noticed we aren't officially supporting Windows anymore, but if we
have it and it works we should mention the fact!
Мсьціслаў Сакалоў
Mar 3, 2009, 9:36:22 AM3/3/09
to qw...@googlegroups.com
Мсьціслаў Сакалоў
Mar 3, 2009, 9:38:59 AM3/3/09
to qw...@googlegroups.com
Oh, sorry. I thought that this is spam with windows xp :)
Once again I am sorry.
2009/3/3, KiraCatgirl <kirac...@gmail.com>:
--
http://www.TrueBSD.org
Once again I am sorry.
2009/3/3, KiraCatgirl <kirac...@gmail.com>:
http://www.TrueBSD.org
Artem Iglikov
Mar 3, 2009, 10:47:17 AM3/3/09
to qw...@googlegroups.com
Hm. The thing is that it works from time to time. Every time I tried
to run winxp-compiled version in vista, I've got no userpics. And
there are some people that say it doesn't always work even in xp. And
if we want to put vista-version, maybe it's better to compile it in
vista. Could somebody do this? (I have no vista anymore so I can't).
to run winxp-compiled version in vista, I've got no userpics. And
there are some people that say it doesn't always work even in xp. And
if we want to put vista-version, maybe it's better to compile it in
vista. Could somebody do this? (I have no vista anymore so I can't).
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages