feedback/testing: optional QuTiP extensions + WASM build path

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Jorge Garcia

unread,
Feb 23, 2026, 9:09:05 AMFeb 23
to qu...@googlegroups.com
Hi  group members, 

I’m sharing a repo with a few QuTiP-focused contributions that might be useful beyond my own project, and I’d really appreciate feedback and testing from people familiar with QuTiP internals and best practices.
 
What hopefully can be useful for QuTiP users/devs:
  1. Does the structure/API feel QuTiP-idiomatic (naming, data flow, solver integration)?
     
  2. Any obvious performance or numerical-stability concerns?
     
  3. Suggestions for how to package this so QuTiP users can adopt pieces independently (or how to upstream only the generally useful parts)?
     
If someone is willing to run quick tests 
Thanks for any pointers,
Jorge Garcia (jagg-ix)
 
 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages