feedback/testing: optional QuTiP extensions + WASM build path

[Jorge Garcia]

Hi  group members, 

I’m sharing a repo with a few QuTiP-focused contributions that might be useful beyond my own project, and I’d really appreciate feedback and testing from people familiar with QuTiP internals and best practices.

Repo: https://github.com/jagg-ix/entropic-time

 

What hopefully can be useful for QuTiP users/devs:

• A reproducible Pyodide/WASM build path for QuTiP demos/tools:
  https://github.com/jagg-ix/entropic-time/tree/master/tools/pyodide-qutip
   
• Optional extensions that implement “entropic/dissipative”  on top of QuTiP objects (separable module, not invasive):
  https://github.com/jagg-ix/entropic-time/tree/master/simulations/catsim/src/qutip_entropic_dynamics
   
• A small DSL layer that composes QuTiP building blocks into repeatable experiment configs:
  https://github.com/jagg-ix/entropic-time/tree/master/simulations/catsim/src/qf_qutip_dsl
   
• Live WASM dashboard demo: https://jagg-ix.github.io/entropic-time/#/simulations
  
  

1. Does the structure/API feel QuTiP-idiomatic (naming, data flow, solver integration)?
    
2. Any obvious performance or numerical-stability concerns?
    
3. Suggestions for how to package this so QuTiP users can adopt pieces independently (or how to upstream only the generally useful parts)?
    

If someone is willing to run quick tests 

Paper (context only): https://zenodo.org/records/18681220/files/Paper2_CAT_EPT_Foundations.pdf?download=1

Thanks for any pointers,
Jorge Garcia (jagg-ix)