On 9 Aug 2015, at 13:48, Patrick Robertson wrote:
> I think it still needs to be more accessible to first time devs.
Me, too.
> I’m not really sure how this could be done,
Me either. :-)
> but maybe some kind of walkthrough of ‘how to find the code you are
> interested in’ kind of thing.
That’s what the “Where is…” section is meant to be. Maybe you
couldn’t tell it was a section, since it’s only has one thing in it
right now. Any ideas for other common things you’d look for? Just give
me a list and I’ll write up the details.
> Perhaps if we’re going to add details about ‘important classes’
> then we could also add it to the classes themselves using doxygen type
> strings, and get that pull request merged…? ;-)
Eventually.
> For ‘the code for some action’. I remember neurolepsy at some
> point *did* make a program (written in lisp) that would match up
> identifiers with names. I can’t remember where it is but that might
> be a useful resource to keep in a repo.
If we can find it. But it’s not that hard to do manually, especially
with nice instructions.
> Should this be a separate ‘development’ repo - that goes with the
> Plugin dev ref, perhaps an example plugin, and also some things to do
> with developing the main QS?
I don’t think so. I like having it close to the code itself. Maybe we
can revisit that if it grows.