Two questions about querydsl

75 views
Skip to first unread message

Mike Stoddart

unread,
Aug 30, 2013, 5:23:49 PM8/30/13
to quer...@googlegroups.com
I have two questions about querydsl.

1) I'm currently using hibernate but I configure it programmatically; I'm not using any XML. Can I do the same with querydsl? I'm still reading the documentation but I thought I would throw it out there.

2) is there any chance that querydsl might support the following the future, if it's even possible:

- cassandra
- Riak
- josql collections
- hazelcast collections?

Thanks!

Timo Westkämper

unread,
Aug 31, 2013, 3:56:12 PM8/31/13
to Querydsl on behalf of Mike Stoddart
Hi Mike.


On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Mike Stoddart via Querydsl <querydsl+noreply-APn2wQeGygYkknc...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
I have two questions about querydsl.

1) I'm currently using hibernate but I configure it programmatically; I'm not using any XML. Can I do the same with querydsl? I'm still reading the documentation but I thought I would throw it out there.

Querydsl JPA has minimal runtime configuration, which is done programmatically and the code generation is configured in the build tool.

2) is there any chance that querydsl might support the following the future, if it's even possible:

    - cassandra
    - Riak
    - josql collections
    - hazelcast collections?

If enough users show interest in any of those and if we find support in implementing them, then additions can be considered.

But currently no new backends are on the roadmap.

Br,
Timo
 

Thanks!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Querydsl" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to querydsl+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
Timo Westkämper
Mysema Oy
+358 (0)40 591 2172
www.mysema.com


Mike Stoddart

unread,
Aug 31, 2013, 6:21:27 PM8/31/13
to quer...@googlegroups.com
Thanks - thinking about this again the latter (JoSQL/Hazelcast) might not be necessary.

From what I can understand, querydsl already queries collections (http://www.querydsl.com/static/querydsl/3.2.3/reference/html/ch02s07.html), which is all JoSQL does.

querydsl could do the same for Hazelcast, because you can get a local copy of a distributed Hazelcast map.

Cassandra is definitely of interest to me and I assume some others - anyone else?

querydsl is definitely an interesting technology, but I need to spend more time reading and playing with it. I like the idea of using one product to query collections, SQL (Hibernate or otherwise) and noSQL. The key thing for me is that everything database related (Hibernate, servers etc) have to be defined in code, not XML.

Thanks

On Saturday, 31 August 2013 15:56:12 UTC-4, Timo Westkämper wrote:
Hi Mike.

c shekhar shukla

unread,
Sep 2, 2013, 2:02:30 AM9/2/13
to quer...@googlegroups.com
hey Mike, 
             we are also using Querydsl, its really good and if you are planning to add some new things pls take me in. I will give my best
thanks
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages