HASIDIC GROUP CHARGED WITH $60 MILLION FRAUD (And Other Issuing of Bogus Tax Receipts by Nizkor/B'nai Brith) S_0210
Ward Cleaver
rights: Fair use [The fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by
reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that
section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching
(including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not
an infringement of copyright. [I]n any particular case is a fair use the factors
to be considered shall include - (1) whether such use is of a commercial
nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes.. ((this material is distributed
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. - FAIR USE INTENDED))>>>
Foreword: Here are the key banner phrases to look for and to keep in mind:
<start/quote>
HASIDIC GROUP CHARGED WITH $60 MILLION FRAUD
The Tash folks, who may or may not have invited neo-Nazi Haider to their
wedding, now have worse headaches to worry about.
Huge tax scam exposed
Religious group issued phony receipts for tens of millions
<end/quote>
<start/quote?
Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.
--
The Nizkor Project
<end/quote>
<start/quote>
Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit Organization (NPO)
Information Return Includes Form T1044
...An NPO described in paragraph 149(1)(l) of the Income
Tax Act is a club,society, or association that is
organized and operated solely for:
social welfare;
civic improvement;
pleasure or recreation;
or any other purpose except profit.
Also, no part of the income of these organizations can
be payable to or otherwise available for the personal
benefit of any proprietor, member, or shareholder,
unless the proprietor, member, or shareholder was a
club, society,or association whose primary purpose
was to promote amateur athletics in Canada.
<end/quote>
<start/quote>
The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation with the
League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada...
Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their donation may call
B'nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and advise the receptionist that they
wish to make a donation to the Nizkor Project...
Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt. [#0235903-43-13]
<end/quote>
<End of Foreword>
-----------------------------------------------------------
<start/quote>
http://www.usajewish.com/scripts/usaj/paper/Article.asp?ArticleID=932
(Link active November 21, 2003. Archived locally as: yid_tax_scam)
HASIDIC GROUP CHARGED WITH $60 MILLION FRAUD
The Tash folks, who may or may not have invited neo-Nazi Haider to their
wedding, now have worse headaches to worry about.
Huge tax scam exposed
Religious group issued phony receipts for tens of millions
Hundreds of people and businesses in Montreal's Jewish community are to face
criminal charges or be required to pay tens of millions of dollars in evaded
taxes as a result of a guilty plea yesterday in a Saint-Jerome court. The guilty
plea by a religious group connected to the Hasidic community in suburban
Boisbriand capped a two-year investigation of what federal tax auditors say is
the largest-ever tax fraud involving a religious organization in Quebec.
The religious group, which is known as Construit Toujours Avec Bonte and has
links to the Montreal Rabbinical College, pleaded guilty to issuing tax receipts
for charitable donations that overstated the amount of the donation.
A senior Montreal construction executive blew the whistle on the scam when he
approached Revenue Canada, now part of the Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency,
with taped information in 1997. The resulting investigation saw federal tax
sleuths seize about $60 million in phony receipts from individuals and
businesses in the Jewish community, court documents say.
Joseph Gutstadt, president of Magil Construction International, the
whistle-blower who exposed the fraud, said in a telephone interview last night
from Israel: "I'm happy that, at the end of the day, justice has prevailed."
But Gutstadt said he was disappointed that Construit Toujours was fined only
$400,000, and that none of the administrators of the organization or the
rabbinical college were charged.
(Montreal Gazette, sent in by R. Shultz)
In pursuit of donors linked to tax evasion Hundreds in Jewish community under
scrutiny by federal officials. Federal tax investigators insisted yesterday that
they will continue an investigation involving hundreds of people and businesses
in the Jewish community suspected of participating in a charitable-donation tax
fraud. The case involves about $60 million in claimed donations, federal tax
officials said, making it Quebec's largest-ever tax fraud involving a religious
organization.
On Wednesday, a religious group connected to the Hasidic community of Tash, in
suburban Boisbriand, pleaded guilty to issuing charitable-donation tax receipts
which overstated the amounts actually given.
Yesterday, the community, through a public-relations firm, asserted that
government officials had agreed not to go after donors who participated in the
scam. The same statement said the community's Montreal Rabbinical College would
retain the right to issue charitable-donation receipts that can be used to
reduce donors' tax liabilities.
(Montreal Gazette, sent in by R. Shultz)
<END>
Remember the key headline from above: "Religious group issued phony receipts for
tens of millions"
Here is essentially the same thing done by B'nai Brith to launder exempt
donations to The Nizkor Project:
The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
<start/quote>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=8f71th%241331%2...@news.tht.net&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: BBsCUT)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8f71th%241331%241%40news.tht.net&output=gplain
From: kmc...@vex.net (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Re: How much of a cut does the B'nai Brith get from Nizkor?
Date: 2000/05/08
Message-ID: <8f71th$1331$1...@news.tht.net>#1/1
References: <2e2f77da...@usw-ex0105-038.remarq.com>
X-Trace: news.tht.net 957811441 35937 216.126.72.2
(8 May 2000 18:44:01 GMT)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Reply-To: kmc...@nizkor.org
In article <2e2f77da...@usw-ex0105-038.remarq.com>,
Blakely <patblakel...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
>
>The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative
>affiliation with the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith
>Canada. The League is a national volunteer organization
>dedicated to combatting antisemitism, racism and bigotry,
>and to promoting human rights for all Canadians.
>
>Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their
>donation may call B'nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224,
>and advise the receptionist >that they wish to make a
>donation to the Nizkor Project; If you prefer, you can print
>this form and send to:
>
>The Nizkor Project
>c/o
>The League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
>15 Hove Street
>Toronto, Ontario M3H 4Y8
>
>Name:________________________________________
>Street Address:____________________________________________
>City_________________State/Province__________Postal Code___
>E-Mail Address:_________________________________
>Amount Enclosed: $___________
>
>Please make your donations payable to "The League for Human
>Rights of B'nai Brith Canada," and add the words "Nizkor Trust
>Fund" to the cheque's memo section. A portion of amounts donated
>to the Trust Fund is used to build the Nizkor Endowment Fund.
>If you prefer that all of your donation be invested for Nizkor's
>future needs, please earmark your cheque or draft with the
>notation 'For The Nizkor Endowment Fund Only. (All bequests
>should be to the 'Nizkor Endowment Fund, Care of The League for
>Human Rights of B'nai Brith
>Canada'.)
>
>
>Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt.
>[#0235903-43-13]
>
></http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html>
>
>How much of cut does this middle man for Nizkor get? 30 percent,
>40 percent?
Nizkor tenders 5% to the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith
Canada. This is done to compensate the League for administration
and accounting expenses. (This was done at my request, since the
League offered to handle the fund on a pro bono basis, and I did
not think that would be fair.)
Ten per cent of all donated funds are credited to the Nizkor
Endowment Fund. Fund assets are invested to provide support for
Nizkor in perpetuity, and are not used for current expenses.
>this also raises a few more questions, questions I am sure the
>Nizkorites will avoid answering:
I hate to burst your bubble, Bubba, but this information is
public knowledge.
>a) Why can't you write a check payable to Nizkor directly?
You can, but it won't get cashed, since Nizkor does not have
any bank accounts. If you feel the need, of course, by all means
write a cheque to Nizkor. It will be returned to you promptly
if you enclose a self-addressed, stamped envelope (Canadian
postage only).
>b) Why does Nizkor not list a PO Box or a valid physical
>address?
It does - see Whois.
>c) Can the B'nai Brith prove every cent given to them for
>Nizkor, actually goes to Nizkor?
Yes, in fact, they can.
>d) Why is Nizkor more secretive than the Klu Klux Klan is? The
>American Knights gladly give out their phone number, street
>address and PO Box. Nizkor does none of that.
Tough break, eh? Nizkor's post office address is public knowledge,
and that's as good as you're going to get. Live with it. (Who on
earth would want a filthy-mouthed twit like Don Ellis calling them?)
>e) Why does every other holocaust group gladly give their
>personal information, but the Gentile ran Nizkor project does
>not? All the Jewish run holocaust groups gladly will explain
>where their donations come from.
It's my part in the continuing global conspiracy to keep you
ignorant, of course. (You are correct, however, in asserting that
Nizkor is run by a gentile, but your bedfellows won't believe you.)
>f) Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for Nizkor?
Yup - I also appreciate revenue from public speaking and site advertising.
<end/quote>
The above only proves "one hand washes the other" and this statement made
by Ken McVay "Nizkor tenders 5% to the League for Human Rights of B'nai
Brith Canada. This is done to compensate the League for administration and
accounting expenses." only shows him giving a "reward" to the very people
who launder his exempt donations he receives which he is not by law entitled
to receive on his own; hence the tax scheme devised to circumvent the law.
As for Ken McVay's statement: "Ten per cent of all donated funds are credited to
the Nizkor Endowment Fund. Fund assets are invested to provide support for
Nizkor in perpetuity.." is also very telling seeing how Nizkor is Ken McVay so
just substitute Ken McVay where you see Nizkor mentioned. It is Ken McVay
Endowment Fund and it is Ken McVay Trust Fund and both being funded through
B'nai Brith. Ken McVay is the sole operator (and sole recipient of exempt
funding) of Nizkor.
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
Here is what CCRA regs say about exempt donations and what is said
about Nizkor.
The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay (Sole Operator)
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
Straight from CCRA: "we have no record of a registered
charity by the name of Nizkor.org."
Canadian revenue payers you need to contact CCRA and
ask them how a website is able to receive "exempt
donations" when it is neither a registered charity or
a Non Profit Organization.
A letter (included below) from CCRA advises me they
never heard of NIZKOR.ORG so you all should be asking
how Nizkor is offering:
"Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax
receipt" when it is nothing more than a website!
A ONE-MAN BUSINESS RUN BY KEN MCVAY!!
CCRA said: "we have no record of a registered charity
by the name of Nizkor.org." (Letter included below)
Only registered charities are allowed to issue "Canadian
receipts"!!
"A registered charity is a charity that has specifically
applied to the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for
registration and has been accepted as such. A registered
charity can issue charitable receipts for tax purposes."
CCRA rule included below with web link for verification!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: Charity webmail <Charities-B...@ccra-adrc.gc.ca>
Sender: "Langdon, Blaine" <xx...@ccra-adrc.gc.ca>
To: <xxx...@xxxxxx.net>
Subject: Registered charity question.
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:23:26 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
(On file and archived locally with all headers as: CCRAreply)
Thank you for your e-mail.
The Charities Directorate of the Canada Customs and
Revenue Agency is responsible for the registration
and compliance of charities in Canada.
These organizations are similar to "exempt organizations"
as are registered in the United States.
However, we have no record of a registered charity
by the name of Nizkor.org.
Additionally, due to the confidentiality provisions
of the Canadian Income Tax Act, I am unable to
disclose information concerning a particular
organization's tax affairs, including measures
taken or to be taken by the Department resulting
from complaints. However, I wish to assure you that
all complaints received by the Department are
treated seriously and are fully investigated,
where appropriate.
Finally, the annual information returns of
Canadian registered charities are available to
the public. However, as you will note from the above,
Nizkor.org is not a registered charity.
The non-profit information return which you
describe is not available to the public.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention.
Sincerely,
Blaine Langdon
Charities Directorate
~~~~END~~~~
LURKERS here is how Ken McVay and his Nizkor
is robbing you:
<start/quote>
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/tax/nonprofit/menu-e.html
(Link active November 21, 2003. Archived locally as CCRAnpo)
Non-profit organizations - Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency
A non-profit organization (NPO) is a club, society, or association that's
organized and operated solely for:
social welfare
civic improvement
pleasure or recreation
any other purpose except profit.
<end/quote>
Ken McVay's NIZKOR.ORG does not fall under any of the above categories.
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/
Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency
Remember Canadian Tax Payers -
It is YOU who are subsidizing Nizkor!
Do you want your tax dollar subsidizing this web site?
Here is Ken McVay, Director of The Nizkor Project, publicly stating:
"Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website."
<start/quote>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=99oro0%24259r%2...@news.tht.net&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: NizkorNOTcharity)
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Re: ATTENTION NIZKOR: Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit
Organization (NPO) Information Return Form T1044
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <99oro0$259r$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <eghvbtgm6r3tsa0ef...@4ax.com>
<3abfe742$0$1...@news.impulse.net>
Poor Mr. Bradbury... if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.
Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.
Paranoia is a terrible thing, particularly when coupled with Mr.
Bradbury's abysmal ignorance.
--
The Nizkor Project
<end/quote>
Glad to see you making that a public record.
Care to explain how a website not being either an "NPO nor a Charity" can
operate as you do and issue tax receipts?
You are NOT allowed by law to grant tax receipts according to CCRA statutes
which you so conveniently deleted. The more you act like a pompous arrogant
ass- the more it makes me want to put you in your place.
Canadian revenue payers take note of this!
He's being subsidized at your expense!
What Ken McVay, director of The Nizkor Project, deleted because
he doesn't want to deal with it:
<start/quote>
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/tg/t4117eq/t4117eq.html#P131_12645
(Link above has expired and the following link replaces it November 21, 2003)
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/tg/t4117/t4117-e.html
(Archived locally as: t4117-e)
Also available as a PDF file:
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/tg/t4117/t4117-02e.pdf
(Archived locally as: t4117-02e)
Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit Organization (NPO)
Information Return Includes Form T1044
Visually impaired persons can get information on services
available to them, and can order publications in braille
or large print, or on audio cassette or computer diskette,
by calling 1-800-267-1267 weekdays from
8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).
[...]
An NPO described in paragraph 149(1)(l) of the Income
Tax Act is a club,society, or association that is
organized and operated solely for:
social welfare;
civic improvement;
pleasure or recreation;
or any other purpose except profit.
Also, no part of the income of these organizations can
be payable to or otherwise available for the personal
benefit of any proprietor, member, or shareholder,
unless the proprietor, member, or shareholder was a
club, society,or association whose primary purpose
was to promote amateur athletics in Canada.
<<Doc Tavish Comments>>
I don't think Nizkor promotes amateur athletics in
Canada! Please note that the law states above:
"no part of the income of these organizations
can be payable to or otherwise available for
the personal benefit of any proprietor.." yet Ken
McVay is the proprietor or director of Nizkor
(a website) and he is on public record (also shown
below) as responding to this question: "Does Ken
McVay pay himself a salary for his work for Nizkor?"
with "Yup."
Plainly this violates the above and seeing how Nizkor
operates as a back room operation from the "proprietor's"
own house (proven below) this operation should be very
questionable!
Finally note that Ken McVay announced in a public
posting above: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity.
Nizkor is a website." How does a "website" warrant
receiving "exempt donations"?
<<End of Doc Tavish Comments>>
Distinguishing non-profit organizations from registered
charities:
An NPO is not a registered charity.
A registered charity is a charity that has specifically
applied to the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for
registration and has been ACCEPTED by CCRA as such.
A registered charity can issue charitable receipts for
tax purposes. An NPO does not have to register either
federally or provincially to maintain
its privileged tax status.
Generally, registered charities also have to disburse
80% of the funds for which they issued charitable receipts
on their own charitable activities or as gifts to qualified
donees.
NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations or membership
fees contributed, and they are not required to disburse a
specified percentage of their earnings.
<end/quote[End of CCRA web page]>
Notice what CCRA said about "issu[ing] charitable receipts
for tax purposes"? Look at McVay's operation and see if it
complies with the law stated above:
"NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations.."
yet Ken McVay's very own BUSINESS - NIZKOR page says:
"Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt."
Ken McVay also is on record as claiming that NIZKOR is NOT a
charity!
(The following are archived locally as:
NizkorFUNDING and Nizkordonation)
http://www.nizkor.org/funding.shtml
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation
(Canadian receipt)
http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation with the
League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada. The League is a national
volunteer organization dedicated to combatting antisemitism, racism and bigotry,
and to promoting human rights for all Canadians.
Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their donation may call
B'nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and advise the receptionist that they
wish to make a donation to the Nizkor Project; If you prefer, you can print this
form and send to:
The Nizkor Project
c/o
The League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario M3H 4Y8
Name:________________________________________
Street Address:________________________________________________
City_________________State/Province__________Postal Code_______
E-Mail Address:_________________________________
Amount Enclosed: $___________
Please make your donations payable to "The League for Human Rights of B'nai
Brith Canada," and add the words "Nizkor Trust Fund" to the cheque's memo
section. A portion of amounts donated to the Trust Fund is used to build the
Nizkor Endowment Fund. If you prefer that all of your donation be invested for
Nizkor's future needs, please earmark your cheque or draft with the notation
'For The Nizkor Endowment Fund Only. (All bequests should be to the 'Nizkor
Endowment Fund, Care of The League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada'.)
Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt. [#0235903-43-13]
-----------------------
Notice what is said above?
Look what Ken Mcvay has said not too long ago:
<start/quote>
(Archived locally as: JEWSdumpMcVay)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=90jnnp%24npp%241%40news.tht.net&rnum=2
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: JEWS DUMPED FAG MCVAY!!!
Date: 5 Dec 2000 21:46:33 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <90jnnp$npp$1...@news.tht.net>
>McVay/Nizkor got caught giving
>fraudulent charitable tax receipts
>for NIZKOR - which is/was NOT
>A CHARITY.
"McVay/Nizkor" has never issued tax receipts of any sort, Mr.
Grosvenor, so it's rather silly to suggest we got "caught at it."
<end/quote>
Notice how McVay says one thing and then says another?
His very own "website" says: "Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax
receipt." http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
Yet in the post just above McVay said:
"McVay/Nizkor" has never issued tax receipts of any sort, Mr. Grosvenor, so it's
rather silly to suggest we got "caught at it."
McVay is a LIAR anyway you look at it! I provided the links to all of my proofs
so that you all, the concerned citizenry may verify my claims.
It is also plain that McVay does not claim Nizkor to be a charitable
organization as shown here:
<start/quote>
(Archived locally as: NizkorSham)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=936j5k%2427s9%241%40news.tht.net&rnum=1
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: Is Ken McVay's WWW.NIZKOR.ORG A Sham
Which Gets its Director Spending Money? R 2
Date: 2001-01-06 00:00:08 PST
In article <8kjd5t0el7tbd9lv4...@4ax.com>,
Doc Tavish <doc_tavi...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>We know that the Nizkor website relies on charitable
>donations in order to survive. We also accept that any
>organization whose survival depends on charitable
>donations should make its records open to the public.
>Will Ken McVay answer these questions as he is the sole
>director of Nizkor!
How does Mr. Bradbury "know" these things?
How does Mr. Bradbury "know" that Nizkor is a "charitable
organization?" (Can he show that anyone from Nizkor has
ever claimed to be such an organization?)
<end/quote>
Being facetious: Well now we know Nizkor is not a "charitable organization"
so it has to be an NPO?! So why does Ken McVay's "NPO" declare at its web
page: "Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt" which would
be in violation of: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations" but Ken
McVay lies to a person who's an object of his smear campaign: "McVay/Nizkor"
has never issued tax receipts of any sort.." Then again McVay admitted higher
up in this post: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website."
See how NIZKOR skirts all criteria of the tax laws?
Does Nizkor or does Nizkor not look crooked?
Seeing how Ken McVay's Nizkor accepts "exempt donation[s]"
it would be interesting to see why the Canadian Government
actually approves an organization with such tax status to
operate under the conditions Ken McVay's Nizkor does.
To this very day Ken McVay will not answer these
questions:
1) What is the tax number of Nizkor?
2) What is the physical address of Nizkor?
3) What is the phone number of Nizkor?
4) Where can one find the organizational papers for Nizkor?
a) How many people compose the Nizkor staff?
According to ex-staffers who have posted articles to
newsgroups, McVay IS THE SOLE PAID EMPLOYEE OF THE
BUSINESS!!!
b) What are the financial responsibilities of Nizkor?
5) What is the evidence offered that Nizkor is authorized to
solicit tax free contributions?
6) How much money does Nizkor Org receive yearly as charitable
donations?
7) You show below that you pay yourself-- what is your yearly pay?
<start/quote>
(Archived locally as: McVaysCut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=8f71th%241331%2...@news.tht.net&lr=&hl=en
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8f71th%241331%241%40news.tht.net&output=gplain
From: kmc...@vex.net (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Re: How much of a cut does the B'nai Brith get from Nizkor?
Date: 2000/05/08
Message-ID: <8f71th$1331$1...@news.tht.net>
>f) Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for Nizkor?
Yup - I also appreciate revenue from public speaking and site
advertising.
<end/quote>
8) Is Nizkor proper (it's office and main facilities)
located in a back room of your own residence as this says?
http://www.geocities.com/dcjarviks/Idler/vIn15.html
(Link active November 21, 2003. Archived locally as: vIn15)
"A Voyage to Nanaimo-- It takes two hours to cross the
Georgia Strait by ferry from Vancouver, British Columbia,
another half-hour by jitney from the Nanaimo terminal to
reach the home of Kenneth N. McVay, webmaster for
The Nizkor Project . The address is an ordinary
suburban split-level in a middle-class neighborhood.
There is nothing distinctive about its location. ....
I am taken to a back room, filled with computer equipment,
monitors, and books... Seated in front of the array is
McVay, apparently a 50-something computer nerd. He is
tall, thin, with short hair and glasses, wired to the
world through his ISP. The Nizkor project which McVay
runs from this room in the back of his house... " <END>
A question for all reading this:
How many organizations which receive charitable
contributions operate from the backroom of the
director's home? Also Nizkor is not an organization; it
is a web site operated solely by Ken McVay as shown here;
<start/quote>
(Archived locally as: SolelyOperated)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=9ks5as%24r19%241%40news.tht.net
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Blubberbury's Bullshit and Blather
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-08-08 12:53:05 PST
Message-ID: <9ks5as$r19$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <3b713eba....@news.abccom.bc.ca>
Ken Lewis writes:
> Ken has already proven otherwise.
>
> The quote you have pasted below was simply never implemented.
> Nizkor was then as it is now - a website. Ken hoped to turn it
> into an organization such as you insist it is but that never
> worked out. Within weeks of that post having been
> made the whole effort to tun it into an organization fell apart.
Indeed it did. Why anyone would post an article that was nearly
five years out of date as if it had relevance is beyond me, but
then, we're dealing with "revisionist scholars" here, so it isn't the
least surprising.
> Thus it remains what it always was. A website run soley by Ken.
Indeed.
<end/quote>
Remember folks the bottom line:
a) Nizkor is a web site solely operated by Ken McVay.
Nizkor is Ken McVay from a backroom of his personal
residence.
b) The Nizkor Endowment Fund is Ken McVay.
c) The Nizkor Trust Fund is Ken McVay.
d) Ken McVay is not entitled to receive "exempt donations"
because his web site is neither an NPO (Non Profit Organization)
nor a registered charity.
e) McVay receives "laundered" exempt donations through B'nai
Brith.
f) McVay then kicks back 5% as tribute.
Those facts can not be denied.
The term AUDIT keeps popping up in my mind!
Attention Canadian lurkers-- these are the contacts to report Ken McVay:
Auditor - CCRA:
canadaint...@pwgsc.gc.ca, comm...@rc.gc.ca
For office phone numbers and addresses, please visit our "Contact us" page
at http://www.ccra.gc.ca/contact.
Need I say more other than B'nai Brith also abuses its tax exempt status to
provide funding to political causes such as communism vis David Lethbridge:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7k086el6rsbp6otg5m%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:45 GMT
Imagine the outrage if the Catholic Church or some Protestant Church were to use
its tax exempt status to fund any group or person the Jews consider to be a
"Nazi"!
Tavish
--Nizkor.Org Director, Ken McVay, Condoning Child Porn--
"I am weary of seeing the issue of "child porn" blown out of
proportion (I've been on and around the Net since 1988, and have
yet to come across anything I'd consider "child porn." I've
seen photos of naked children, but then I've got some of those in
my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any great
moral danger to our society)." - Nizkor Director Ken McVay
http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html
Verified by John Morris with Message ID:
cf214uoohhmoqblmv...@4ax.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=cf214uoohhmoqblmv...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: John_Confirms)
(For the record this child porn apologist is funded by B'nai Brith
as shown here: http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
B'nai Brith must condone pictures of "naked children" too!)
Here is a photo of Ken McVay, director of WWW.NIZKOR.ORG-- does he
not have the uncouth look as to fit the profile of a person who
would say in general regarding child porn: "I am weary of seeing the
issue of "child porn" blown out of proportion (I've been on and
around the Net since 1988, and have yet to come across anything I'd
consider "child porn." I've seen photos of naked children, ... and
fail to see the harm, or any great moral danger to our society)."?
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg
(Archived locally as: ChickenHawk_McVay)
Would any of you want to leave this person, Ken McVay,
alone with your children?
The Nizkor Project aka Ken McVay
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Beaver Cleaver
OBC" <spam...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>
><hym3n_h0l0c4$t...@salmahayeksknockers.edu> wrote in message
>news:mvcWb.25463$Qa3.4360@edtnps89...
>> In can.general Ken McVay, OBC <spam...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>>
>> > This will enlighten you as to the source of this racist material - it's
>> > about "Ward Cleaver's" true self:
>>
>> It is unfortunate that people aren't this incredible multi-million dollar
>> fraud more seriously, instead of attempting to deflect attention away with
>> character assassination.
>
>"Character assassination" my Aunt Fanny. The document posted was accepted as
>FACT in a Pennsylvania court, and stands to this day as FACT.
It was accepted as FACT because I did not contest it and the reason because it
wasn't contested is because the complaints were never served!! GET THAT INTO
YOUR HEAD YOU LYING BASTARD!!!
I.E.
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... Even after the
defendant is represented by counsel, mail is still sent directly to the
defendant addressed to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When attorney Leach asked Mr.
Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes involved in the case,
he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this is not a lawsuit, it is
a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never met. The court should
not be a party to this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Looks like the court ruled in my favor to me! Yale even lost his appeal as well!
Looks like I was victorious twice!
<START>
September 26, 2001
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
RE: Yale F. Edeiken, Appellant v. Scott Bradbury et al
1714 EDA 2001
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
This is to advise that the attached Order has been entered in the
above- captioned matters.
A Certified Copy of this Order together with the record will be
sent to the Prothonotary of Lehigh County in due course.
Very truly yours,
(Signed)
David A. Szewczak
Prothonotary
DAS/dag
Attachment
CC: Daylin B. Leach, Esquire
Scott Bradbury
Honorable Edward D. Reibman
The Attachment:
<Start>
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Eastern District Office
Yale F. Edeiken APPELLANT No. 1714 EDA 2001
V.
Scott Bradbury Et Al C.P. Civil Lehigh County
99-C-2786
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2001, the within
appeal is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief."
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
The prudent question to why Yale failed to file his brief is answered in this
archive which shows his motive for legal system abuse and how serious he was NOT
in litigating me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=sq4v2us0odig5nhq79f6crk7a2e7lsqh1s%404ax.com&rnum=6&filter=0
Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal..
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:30:59 -0600
Message-ID: <sq4v2us0odig5nhq7...@4ax.com>
Yeah- trotting out the same failed lawsuit against me of which the shyster never
bothered to serve the complaints which makes his: "Defendant Scott Bradbury
admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:" RATHER
assinine!
The fact that you keep strutting out a failed lawsuit against me filed by a
bastard who is a pariah of his own legal community shows what a loser and a
little pernicious little shit you are McVay!
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse V2.1 S_0102
Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 19:02:18 GMT
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
Yale F. Edeiken is a perjurer, a convicted criminal, and a nut case and his
failed lawsuit against me is testament to it and the fact you keep posting it
proves you're running on empty McVay. Read my sig line to see what a nut case
your hero Edeiken is!
Tavish
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
YOU KEEP WANTING TO OVERLOOK THE REAL FACTS YOU LYING DEVIL!! How can you ever
be honest McVay when you lie about your funding?
I.E.
--Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He Denies
Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund?--
NEWER UPDATED VERSION:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=f7murv0qqpmcfa2ldce7epo9gtg5am23rl%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED The Nizkor Project Director is Lying About Funds He Has NOT
Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is Further Proof! R_1122
Message-ID: <f7murv0qqpmcfa2ld...@4ax.com>
Date: 22 Nov 2003 13:01:32 GMT
AKA "Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
OLDER ORIGINAL VERSION:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
>It is unfortunate that people don't take such racist hatemongering more
>seriously, instead of attempting to sweep it under the carpet and hope no
>one will notice.
Here is real racist hatemongering:
--Jewish Tradition will NEVER teach Non-Jews as being equals--
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=jne720pakjho7ogu4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Bigotry by Jews Toward Non-Jews (Wine Bigotry) New Findings [In Their
Own Words Series] V3.0 S_0206 Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:14:23 -0600
Message-ID: <jne720pakjho7ogu4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=3oie10pah2urec3rn...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Non-Jews: What is Taught About Them & How They are Viewed by 21st
Century Pharisees V2.1b S_0127
Message-ID: <3oie10pah2urec3rn...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jan 2004 05:42:22 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=b6beevshh8dcr43hk33rafn23fvo2p8c9c%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: All Men Are Created Equal is NOT a Jewish Concept
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 08:27:38 -0500
Message-ID: <b6beevshh8dcr43hk...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=iajpkv0j8trac76ia...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Jews Want Legal and Financial Superiority Over the Non-Jew; Who is NOT
a "Brother" in Their Eyes! V2.0 R_0827
Message-ID: <iajpkv0j8trac76ia...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Aug 2003 15:36:36 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ejoodv8ba5n1ja6k5f13i0bfp46nhfb257%404ax.com&rnum=3
Subject: Bigoted Reasoning of Jews on Relations with Non-Jews From Chabad
Lubavitch Cyberspace Website
Message-ID: <ejoodv8ba5n1ja6k5...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3eaade4a.64590087%40tavish-central.net&rnum=5
Subject: Exclusion Entirely of Non-Jews in the Jewish Scheme of Things! R_0426
Message-ID: <3eaade4a...@tavish-central.net>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3eca1e34.54088216%40tavish-central.net&rnum=6
Subject: Lessons in Tanya- Hasidism - Only Jews Have Souls & Heavenly
Pre-Earthly Existence? R_0520
Message-ID: <3eca1e34...@tavish-central.net>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=vf6a00t3gfv5fs3mt...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: UPDATED LINKS!! About Kashrus and Supervision - What Jews Teach
Concerning non-Jews (In Their Own Words Series) V2.0 S_0114
Message-ID: <vf6a00t3gfv5fs3mt...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2004 10:40:16 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=6q6a00l6th5th925jsoker2al5uklvopb0%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: V2.1b Non-Jew Can't Pour Wine for a Jew -- Only a Fellow Jew Can!
(Classic Repost) New Links Added! S_0114
Message-ID: <6q6a00l6th5th925j...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2004 10:39:48 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=hhi10010pfq6v2nas...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Jews Are Self Admitted "Separatists" and Aliens In Whatever Nation They
Reside In! V3.0b S_0110
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:40:23 -0600
Message-ID: <hhi10010pfq6v2nas...@4ax.com>
>I'm not the least surprised you took that position. It's consistent, if
>nothing else.
You are a liar and your NIZKOR web site is nothing more than a communist front
sponsored by another communist front and hiding behind "Holocaust Research" and
why anyone should think your web site could be credible when y9our dishonesty is
so apparent is beyond belief!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p0afnvchj52pcuh6c0dk78f9bs7ngfetac%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <p0afnvchj52pcuh6c...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:54 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4186tvsr4d3oiodp2nibbuvuj91rakvimb%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED! B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge
Against Capitalism, and Christianity V2.0 R_1207
Message-ID: <4186tvsr4d3oiodp2...@4ax.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2003 12:48:39 GMT
You have as many self serving funding scams as Carter has Little Pills you
snake:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhao2v4fbuij94mcmi6sicj73sa4eifsns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=qa5trvoa3c6ella1o1j7btunqvcbjh9pt2%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG and B'nai Brith's Apparent Funding Kick Backs and Tax Scam
Message-ID: <qa5trvoa3c6ella1o...@4ax.com>
Date: 21 Nov 2003 23:56:36 GMT
Who would trust a person who views naked children pictures from the NET like you
do McVay!
--Nizkor.Org Director, Ken McVay, Condoning Child Porn--
"I am weary of seeing the issue of "child porn" blown out of
proportion (I've been on and around the Net since 1988, and have
yet to come across anything I'd consider "child porn." I've
seen photos of naked children, but then I've got some of those in
my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any great
moral danger to our society)." - Nizkor Director Ken McVay
http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html
(Archived locally as: pedo_McVay)
Verified by John Morris with Message ID:
cf214uoohhmoqblmv...@4ax.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=cf214uoohhmoqblmv...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: John_Confirms)
(For the record this child porn apologist is funded by B'nai Brith
as shown here: http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
B'nai Brith must condone pictures of "naked children" too!)
Here is a photo of Ken McVay, director of WWW.NIZKOR.ORG-- does he
not have the uncouth look as to fit the profile of a person who
would say in general regarding child porn: "I am weary of seeing the
issue of "child porn" blown out of proportion (I've been on and
around the Net since 1988, and have yet to come across anything I'd
consider "child porn." I've seen photos of naked children, ... and
fail to see the harm, or any great moral danger to our society)."?
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg
(Archived locally as: ChickenHawk_McVay)
Would any of you want to leave this person, Ken McVay,
alone with your children?
The Nizkor Project aka Ken McVay
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
Does anything else need to be said other than the only way for Ken McVay to view
those pictures of naked children on the NET is for him to have downloaded them!
THAT IS FACT!!
I DON'T HAVE TO MAKE UP LIES ABOUT YOU MCVAY-- YOU JUST BEING YOU IS ENOUGH
MATERIAL FOR A LIFETIME!!!
Tavish
Ken Lewis
<beaver_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:48:07 -0800, <c0c55...@enews3.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
>OBC" <spam...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>><hym3n_h0l0c4$t...@salmahayeksknockers.edu> wrote in message
>>news:mvcWb.25463$Qa3.4360@edtnps89...
>>> In can.general Ken McVay, OBC <spam...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>>> > This will enlighten you as to the source of this racist material - it's
>>> > about "Ward Cleaver's" true self:
>>> It is unfortunate that people aren't this incredible multi-million dollar
>>> fraud more seriously, instead of attempting to deflect attention away with
>>> character assassination.
>>"Character assassination" my Aunt Fanny. The document posted was accepted as
>>FACT in a Pennsylvania court, and stands to this day as FACT.
>It was accepted as FACT because I did not contest it and the reason because it
>wasn't contested is because the complaints were never served!! GET THAT INTO
>YOUR HEAD YOU LYING BASTARD!!!
Because you kept returning them unopened you stupid fuck. How dumb can
you be?
Beaver Cleaver
NOPE!! Yale was bound by a written agreement (which he broke) to NO LONGER HAVE
ANY CONTACT WITH ME AT ALL!! That agreement was made on May 29, 2000. Instead of
being professional with my attorney here is how you kike acted:
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant. The court has
heard telephone messages left on the defendant's answering machine, in which
the plaintiff admits dedicating himself to making the defendant's life a "living
hell." He refers to the defendant as a "miserable piece of shit" among other
charming epithets. The defendant's private medical information, subpoenaed by
Mr. Edeiken finds its way onto the Internet. Even after the defendant is
represented by counsel, mail is still sent directly to the defendant addressed
to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of
the complaint when he first becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You"
via e-mail. In plain English, this is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged
by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never met. The court should not be a party to
this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The key statements above were: "Since a complaint has never been filed or
served, the defendant is unable to attach a copy of preliminary objections he
would file if the judgment was opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a)." AND
"When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first
becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail." IOW I was not
given my right to due process by Edeiken to defend myself from his numerous
documented perjurious accusations and some are detailed here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
Truth and fair play haven't ever been traits Yale F. Edeiken nor his supporters
have ever believed in or practiced!!
Now go drop dead you evil piece of shit!
Tavish
I.E.
Ken Lewis
<beaver_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
Me? I didn't do anything.
But your actions are a matter of public record and the findings have
been accepted as FACT by the courts.
You are a real nutter, Bradshit. Seek help.
Beaver Cleaver
Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
Your pal Yale won't be laughing much longer and he did perjure himself you
lying little bastard!
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
>YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
>Plaintiff :
> :
>vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>
>SCOTT BRADBURY
> 24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"You only want to blow Joe
>You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1201801624195636%40unribbed.net&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: A-1Not1 and A-1Not2)
From: earlt...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Vapor, Fatelvis, Bull Conner & B9Predator. Prepare for the worst.
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: <12018016...@unribbed.net>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915759892 24.65.203.77
(Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network Canada
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.flame.niggers
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: PIN JOE DOWN AND SUCK HIS COCK
> > Isn't strange that Yale has only two little harmless posts to offer
> >in his insane attempts to slander?
>
> If they are harmless why are your associates so upset. Indeed you
> admit that. If they were "harmless" they could not be "slander" (they
> aren't, of course).
>
> > REMEMBER: THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> But I neither fear you or smear you.
you only want to blow joe
you want to suck joes aryan cock dont you yale
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Not sent by me, not signed "Doc Tavish" and it's from a regular ISP too!
That is perjury submitting falsified evidence!
> 26 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"Are you homosexual, Yale?
>
>Your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely trying to
>make trouble like a malicious fag does
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-3."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=486bdd608ea62bee...@anonymous.poster&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: A-3Not1 and A-3Not2)
From: Secret Squirrel <an...@squirrel.owl.de>
Subject: Yale The FAG Burps
Date: 1998/12/06
Message-ID: <486bdd608ea62bee...@anonymous.poster>#1/1
References: <19981204233749...@ng96.aol.com> <36695...@news3.ente
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<postm...@squirrel.owl.de>. The message sender's identity is unknown,
unlogged, and not replyable.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Rabbi Bellinger Lectures the Jews on Judaism
> > THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> I neither smear you or fear you. I have very little to fear from a
> lying anti-Semite without even the nerve to defend his ideas before an >
impartial tribunal.
>
>
> "hello? antone out there 12-14 e-mail me. i am thirteen and . .
> .well if you e-mail me at jbel...@sprynet.com you can find out more
> about me i am a female."
>
> --YFE
are you homosexual yale
your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely
trying to make trouble like a malicious fag does
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
An anonymous post and it was NOT signed Doc Tavish as Yale claimed in a
sworn statement. I wonder if he would deny he has perjured himself!
> 31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "So why do you still want to suck his cock?
>Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
>
> Doc Tavish"
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org&output=gplain
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org
(Archived locally as: A-7Not1 and A-7Not2)
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE
so why do you still want to suck his cock
do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Yale got the author and date wrong too and the post was not signed
Doc Tavish as he claimed in his perjured statement. I also never had
an account at the regular ISP used either! CRIMINAL PERJURY!!!
> 33. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"What are you doing, Yale trolling for young boys again ? We all know you
>have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who
>oppose"gay rights" We also know how you have slandered the most righteous
>Rev Fred Phelps in the past for his stands against the homosexual
>lifestyle.
>
>When are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and seek
>to live a meaningful life with purpose? Why do you wish to portray
>yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
>Allentown Pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
>pride at all?"
>
>I guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
>homosexual sympathist from Nizkor you are -- why are Nizkorians so
>pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you are
>homosexual. If any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group
>because you all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with
>your Barbie doll faggot child molester
>
> Doc Tavish:
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-10."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=19981206172003.29681.qmail%40nym.alias.net&output=gplain
(Archived locally as: A-10Not1 and A-10Not2)
From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <m...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Yale Edeiken a Trolling Chickenhawk?
Date: 1998/12/06
Message-ID: <1998120617200...@nym.alias.net>#1/1
References: <19981205163543...@ng115.aol.com> <3669b...@news3.ent
X-Comment1: This message did not originate from the
X-Comment2: above address. It was automatically remailed
X-Comment3: by an anonymous mail service. Please report
X-Comment4: problems or inappropriate use to
X-Comment5: <postm...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.politics.libertarian.gay
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Rabbi Bellinger Lectures the Jews on Judaism
> References: <19981205163543...@ng115.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.51
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.51
> Message-ID: <3669b...@news3.enter.net>
yale edeiken's obvious chickenhawk troll lines:
> "hello? antone out there 12-14 e-mail me. i am thirteen and . .
> .well if you e-mail me at ya...@enter.net you can find out more
> about me i am a female."
>
> --YFE
what are you doing yale trolling for young boys again -- we all know you
have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who oppose
"gay rights" -- we also know how you have slandered the most
righteous rev fred phelps in the past for his stands against
the homosexual lifestyle
when are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and
seek to live a meaningful life with purpose -- why do you wish to portray
yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
allentown pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
pride at all
i guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
homosexual sympathist from nizkor you are -- why are nizkorians so
pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you
are homosexual
if any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group because you
all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with your
barbie doll faggot child molestor
aryan-american
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again an anonymous post which Yale perjured himself by signing my nym
"Doc Tavish" in his complaint and attributed it to me in a sworn statement.
> 34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
>custody until a final solution can be made.
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A11."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1B209C3CD.7C009BBF34A90591%40library-proxy.airnews.net&output=gplain
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: A-11Not1 and A-11Not2)
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500
all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again a post Yale admitted in a sworn statement signed "Doc Tavish"
when it is obvious another person posted it! PERJURY!!!!!
THE FOLLOWING IS THE CROWN OF MANUFACTURING EVIDENCE AND REMEMBER ALL OF THIS
FALSE TESTIMONY WAS SUBMITTED TO A CIVIL COURT AS SWORN STATEMENTS BY CRIMINAL
PERJURER NAMED YALE F. EDEIKEN OF ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA!!
The following false contrived accusation is the pinnacle of perjury or
manufacturing of evidence to be submitted as sworn testimony in a court of law
and this was done by a Plaintiff (who was his own attorney and who is an
attorney) against the Defendant; me. I will slam dunk this criminality in full
just below!
> 39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
>
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
>
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
> qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
> 4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Positive proof 100% that the Plaintiff willfully and most maliciously lied to a
civil court with the above accusation:
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&output=gplain
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
<end>
Notice what was said in an anonymous post (shown just below) and the date of the
post and compare it to what Yale F. Edeiken charges just above! Remember Yale
claimed I e-mailed the above to him and he claimed I signed it and had my
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199902171515.KAA08970%40domains.invweb.net
(Archived locally as: AnonIcePick1 and AnonIcePick2)
From: Anonymous (nob...@openpgp.net)
Subject: Re: Joe Bellinger, Proven Liar
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Date: 1999/02/17
> > >>It is thus established that:
> > >>
> > >> - Joe Bellinger stated that he does, in fact, "post deliberate
> > >>misinformation".
> > >> - Joe Bellinger denied having made said statement.
> > >> - Joe Bellinger is, therefore, a liar.
> > >>
> > >>To coin a phrase: GAME, SET, MATCH.
> > >Did anyone expect any different result?
> > LOL! For grown men, you are all so childish.
:
> Expecting some minimal level of honesty -- a low standard which
> you seem incapable of meeting -- is hardly "childish."
>
> It frightens me that, with attitudes like this, you are raising a
> child.
>
> In article <19990112213243...@ng31.aol.com>,
> deb...@aol.com
> (Debunks) wrote: "I post deliberate misinformation . . ."
>
> --YFE
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
~~End of GOOGLE aka DejaCom Archive~~
Notice the above was an anonymous post. It was not an e-mail and notice that it
had no digital signature signed by me! Also notice the big difference in dates
the above was posted February 17, 1999 yet Yale accuses me: "That on November
11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic communication stating in
pertinent part (the above EXACT quoted text)"
Witness this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&ic=1&selm=osjdbt41kq8ov7moqagjivihjnda67vadt%404ax.com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=96fnp3%242bar%2...@news.tht.net&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: LibelousPerjury)
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
<stop>
Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!
Here is the official reply to my inquiry:
X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>
--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.
To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.
(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)
> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.
That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.
> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM
<END>
--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X
NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!
What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?
[...]
Here is Yale making his false accusation in public forum:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3920d160.112256232%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: YalesLies)
Subject: Yale's Anonymous Post Signed By Me?! What an Oaf! aka Re: Bradbury
Caught in a Psychotic Delusional Rage
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <3920d160....@news.flash.net>
On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=GU3U4.3347%24v%255.2...@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: YaleLied1 and YaleLied2)
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...
[...]
>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you
Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?
>and was signed by you.
Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!
What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Ms1U4.3324%24v%255.238968%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
Archived locally as: Nradbury1 and Nradbury2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
(Exact quote for the record)
" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""
No headers and no signature.
I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."
>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~
PERJURY!!
LIVE WITH IT KEN LEWIS!! That lawsuit was DISMISSED. Yale lost!
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
[...]
<STOP>
<START>
September 26, 2001
Very truly yours,
The Attachment:
<STOP>
Tavish
Ken Lewis
<beaver_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
Sure he will be. The findings have been accepted as fact by the court
and there is not one thing you can or will do about it, Bradshit. We
know it and you know it.
Beaver Cleaver
Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
My name is NOT Bradshit you evil cock sucker and you are perpetuating another
smear started by kike bastard Edeiken who is some real shining example of the
legal community NOT!
> REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
> NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
THOSE COMPLAINTS WERE NEVER SERVED!!! THAT IS FACT!!
(I was NOT given "thirty (30) days")
Yale F. Edeiken proved via the docket he knew I had an attorney
when he issued a subpoena on him (from the Docket printout):
"July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." This is on the docket of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
I was given 30 days to refute the false accusations BUT Yale did not serve the
complaints on my attorney! August 25, 2000 - 30 days = about July 27, 2000!
Why didn't Yale serve those complaints on my attorney as he was required by a
written agreement and the rules of civil procedure to do!? Also the time span
between Yale subpoenaing my attorney on July 14, 2000 to his date of (temporary)
default judgment of August 25, 2000 is about 43 days! So I ask why didn't Yale
follow the rules of civil procedure?
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... Even after the
defendant is represented by counsel, mail is still sent directly to the
defendant addressed to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When attorney Leach asked Mr.
Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes involved in the case,
he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this is not a lawsuit, it is
a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never met. The court should
not be a party to this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Yeah- trotting out the same failed lawsuit against me of which the shyster never
bothered to serve the complaints which makes his: "Defendant Scott Bradbury
admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:" RATHER
assinine!
For a FACT Yale F. Edeiken tried to abuse the legal system to give David Michael
the same "treatment" he was giving me and Yale never served complaints on
David's attorney either!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: other_Edeiken_lawsuit)
Message-ID: <39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:13:59 +0100
From: david_michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
Subject: The other Edeiken lawsuit
I wasn't going to post any more on this until the judgement. However,
Yale F Edeiken has recently been crowing mightily here regarding his
undoubted legal victory over Mr Bradbury. I think that there is a
powerful case, therefore, for taking some of the wind out of his sails.
Regular readers of this newsgroup might recall the following statements
from Yale F Edeiken in Message-ID:
<PVaG4.2086$Oc2.1...@monger.newsread.com> on 4 April 2000.
First there was this:
<begin quote>
david.michael <david....@england.com> taking a break from his usual
program of criminal harassment of others wrote in message
news:38E904B5...@england.com...'
<end quote>
An allegation of criminal harassment in a public forum.
Then we had the following prophecy:
<begin quote>
Second, you have been sued as you well know. You will soon be getting
the same treatment as Defendant Bradbury. I think you will be as
cowardly as him about showing up.
<end quote>
The 'treatment' that Mr Bradbury had to endure was a subpoena against
his ISP to get his home address, which was then circulated, culminating
in a campaign of harassment and vicious telephone calls by someone
against him.
Then we had the following bit of abuse, which was also e-mailed to me
quite unsolicited:
<begin quote>
Now how about a straight answer to the questions that you have been
dodging like the lying lying nazi fuck you are:
<end quote>
Well, let us look at where we are a few months later.
Mr Edeiken has filed a lawsuit against me in Pennsylvania. No documents
were ever served on me with regard to this lawsuit. Moreover, it stated
no cause of action. As Mr Edeiken had obviously assumed that I would
chicken out, allowing the thing simply to lapse unserved, I appointed an
attorney in PA to deal with him in a very non-chickenly way.
I recently received a communication from that attorney's paralegal that
stated, inter alia:
<begin quote>
Please be advised that we have filed the Rule to Show Cause in your
case. Mr. Edeiken must now move forward with this matter and file a
complaint . . . we are awaiting the statutory allowed time period during
which Mr. Edeiken can make a response.
<end quote>
Mr Edeiken evidently thought that he could use the law to silence
certain revisionist posters here. Mr Edeiken apparently assumed that we
would all cower before him like baby guinea pigs confronted by an
over-large lettuce leaf. Some have obliged him and will suffer the
consequences.
But we have news for this great legal warrior.
We are now waiting for HIM to produce his arguments and evidence and
place them before the courts where he may rest assured that they will
meet a vigorous response. Not only that but, once he does so, we will
look very closely at the legality of Mr Edeiken's own actions and
statements with a view to possible counter actions.
'I think you will be as cowardly as him about showing up.' Those were Mr
Edeiken's words. Well, Pennsylvania is a long way from Lincolnshire and
I may not show up in person -- but I'll sure as hell have someone
showing up on my behalf. That is a firm promise.
So what will our great legal warrior do now?
Will he present a complaint and give us the opportunity to give him the
sound legal thrashing that he deserves?
Or will he quietly drop both his lawsuits and slink off into the
darkness of the night?
The world awaits, Yale F Edeiken.
And so does that court in Pennsylvania.
David
~~End of EXACT GOOGLE Archive~~
I.E.
Tavish
Ken Lewis
<beaver_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
What IS your name then? Fat Fuck? Lard Ass? Stupid Shit?
Stay stupid, shit for brains. The courts have accepted the evidence
as a finding of fact. You didn't contest it because you were so
fucking stupid you kept reruning the documents unopened. That just
about makes you the dumbest fuck in the U.S.
Beaver Cleaver
Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>Stay stupid, shit for brains. The courts have accepted the evidence
>as a finding of fact. You didn't contest it because you were so
>fucking stupid you kept reruning the documents unopened. That just
>about makes you the dumbest fuck in the U.S.
Yale violated the disciplinary rules and he was required to only contact me
through my attorney I paid good money for! You defend a bastard who has been
reproved three times by the highest court of his state!
Ken Lewis
<beaver_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:13:31 GMT, <jo9l20lar0qr74bo0...@4ax.com>
>Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>
>>Stay stupid, shit for brains. The courts have accepted the evidence
>>as a finding of fact. You didn't contest it because you were so
>>fucking stupid you kept reruning the documents unopened. That just
>>about makes you the dumbest fuck in the U.S.
>
>Yale violated the disciplinary rules and he was required to only contact me
>through my attorney I
You didn't have an attorney at that time, shit for brains. Stay
stupid, eh?
j4m4l_...@salmahayeksknockers.edu
> You didn't have an attorney at that time, shit for brains. Stay
> stupid, eh?
It always amazes me how you people can't make a simple point without exuding
hostility.
--
.............................................................................
"The intifada is the Palestinian people's war of national liberation. We
enthusiastically chose to become a colonialist society, ignoring
international treaties, expropriating lands, transferring settlers from
Israel to the occupied territories, engaging in theft and finding
justification for all these activities we established an apartheid regime"
-Micahe Ben-Yair, Former Attorney general of Israel
.............................................................................
ds...@m3m3t1ccand1ru.com http://www.memeticcandiru.com
Ken Lewis
j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>In can.general Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>> You didn't have an attorney at that time, shit for brains. Stay
>> stupid, eh?
>It always amazes me how you people can't make a simple point without exuding
>hostility.
Oh, no. You misunderstand. That wasn't hostility. It was a point of
fact.
j4m4l_...@salmahayeksknockers.edu
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:19:42 GMT,
> j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>>In can.general Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>>> You didn't have an attorney at that time, shit for brains. Stay
>>> stupid, eh?
>>It always amazes me how you people can't make a simple point without exuding
>>hostility.
> Oh, no. You misunderstand. That wasn't hostility. It was a point of
> fact.
The point about the attorney may have been fact, however, the comments about
"shit for brains" and "stupid", were gratuitous and hostile.
--
.............................................................................
Beauty comes cheap in a wealthy country
.............................................................................
ds...@m3m3t1ccand1ru.com http://www.memeticcandiru.com
Ken Lewis
j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>In can.general Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:19:42 GMT,
>> j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>>>In can.general Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>>>> You didn't have an attorney at that time, shit for brains. Stay
>>>> stupid, eh?
>>>It always amazes me how you people can't make a simple point without exuding
>>>hostility.
>> Oh, no. You misunderstand. That wasn't hostility. It was a point of
>> fact.
>The point about the attorney may have been fact, however, the comments about
>"shit for brains" and "stupid", were gratuitous and hostile.
Oh, no. You still misunderstand. They were points of fact as well.
j4m4l_...@salmahayeksknockers.edu
> Oh, no. You still misunderstand. They were points of fact as well.
You are petty and malicious.
--
.............................................................................
Chase after truth like hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never
touch its coat-tails.
-Clarence Darrow
.............................................................................
ds...@m3m3t1ccand1ru.com http://www.memeticcandiru.com
Ken Lewis
j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>In can.general Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>> Oh, no. You still misunderstand. They were points of fact as well.
>You are petty and malicious.
No. No. You STILL don't understand. Bradbury is a brian-dead,
malicious piece of racist gutter trash who continually posts lies and
falsehoods about people he doesn't like and who has gone out of his
way to try and destroy several people's lives. He is petty a
malicious. I am just putting forth the points of fact. He indeed has
shit for brains and he will indeed stay stupid.
What part of this are you having a hard time understanding?
Triumphal Archist
kml...@nospam.shaww.ca says...
I think you're getting word 'admitting' mixed up with 'understanding'
Wally Cleaver
j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>In can.general Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:19:42 GMT,
>> j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>
>>>In can.general Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>
>>>> You didn't have an attorney at that time, shit for brains. Stay
>>>> stupid, eh?
>
>>>It always amazes me how you people can't make a simple point without exuding
>>>hostility.
>
>> Oh, no. You misunderstand. That wasn't hostility. It was a point of
>> fact.
>
>The point about the attorney may have been fact,
The thing is-- I did have an attorney at the time and the man who was his own
attorney who sued me did not follow civil procedure one bit and that is why his
frivolous lawsuit against me was DISMISSED!
I.E.
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant. The court has
heard telephone messages left on the defendant's answering machine, in which
the plaintiff admits dedicating himself to making the defendant's life a "living
hell." He refers to the defendant as a "miserable piece of shit" among other
charming epithets. The defendant's private medical information, subpoenaed by
Mr. Edeiken finds its way onto the Internet. Even after the defendant is
represented by counsel, mail is still sent directly to the defendant addressed
to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of
the complaint when he first becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You"
via e-mail. In plain English, this is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged
by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never met. The court should not be a party to
this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The key statements above were: "Since a complaint has never been filed or
served, the defendant is unable to attach a copy of preliminary objections he
would file if the judgment was opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a)." AND
"When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first
becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail."
Here is the result of the above document which still causes misery for those who
can't refute me and choose to engage in hate:
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
>however, the comments about "shit for brains" and "stupid", were gratuitous
>and hostile.
That is all he has. Just look at every reply he and his fellows make and they
are all filled with ad hominem attack and insult right after another which
proves my original Maxim is "right on."
My "Maxim Concerning Debate"- Originally written in a letter to Liberal
Radio Talk Show Host Jim Hightower:
"I am tired of seeing people get attacked for speaking
the truth and the hecklers not being able to prove their point
other than scorn or ridicule.
Liberals can't refute the truth so all liberals instead
attempt to make the truth bearer into a buffoon hoping to draw the
public's attention away from the message!
I will tell you a secret and I hope that you learn from it!
This is my original- "If I hear something being debated pertaining
to a subject that I am not cognizant of, therefore impartial, I
examine the manner of the debate and conduct. I know who is telling
the truth and who is lying by the tactics employed- the liar always
attacks the opposing person and the truth teller always attacks the
opposing premise!"
-Subject: Tavish Maxim Concerning Debate.
-Date: 1997/12/09
-Message-ID: <348ccbc4....@news.smart1.net>
Wally Cleaver
j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>In can.general Ken Lewis <kml...@nospam.shaww.ca> wrote:
>
>> Oh, no. You still misunderstand. They were points of fact as well.
>
>You are petty and malicious.
Amen!
Wally Cleaver
My my my what a tolerant person you are NOT! Read these and you will feel much
better! http://tinyurl.com/yps9d and http://tinyurl.com/23qcy
>What part of this are you having a hard time understanding?
I told you that the populace is starting to see your types for what you are but
you wouldn't listen!! Keep shooting yourself in the foot! I love it!
My "Maxim Concerning Debate"- Originally written in a letter to Liberal
Radio Talk Show Host Jim Hightower:
"I am tired of seeing people get attacked for speaking
the truth and the hecklers not being able to prove their point
other than scorn or ridicule.
Liberals can't refute the truth so all liberals instead
attempt to make the truth bearer into a buffoon hoping to draw the
public's attention away from the message!
I will tell you a secret and I hope that you learn from it!
This is my original- "If I hear something being debated pertaining
to a subject that I am not cognizant of, therefore impartial, I
examine the manner of the debate and conduct. I know who is telling
the truth and who is lying by the tactics employed- the liar always
attacks the opposing person and the truth teller always attacks the
opposing premise!"
-Subject: Tavish Maxim Concerning Debate.
-Date: 1997/12/09
-Message-ID: <348ccbc4....@news.smart1.net>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Wally Cleaver wrote
in message <ht2r201ep9skg2hcu...@4ax.com>:
>On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:41:57 GMT, <FmEWb.37754$964.16908@edtnps84>
>j4m4l_$1xp...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
>>The point about the attorney may have been fact,
>The thing is-- I did have an attorney at the time
... who had *yet* to file an appearance, which means that to the
*court* you did not have.
>and the man who was his own
>attorney who sued me did not follow civil procedure one bit
Wrong.
>and that is why his frivolous lawsuit against me was DISMISSED!
Except that it *wasn't* dismissed. It was found as *fact* that each
and everyone of the allegations against you was true, but that the
court didn't have jurisdiction.
>CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
>Lehigh County Courthouse
>455 W. Hamilton Street
>Allentown, PA 18101-1614
>RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
>
>Filed September 22, 2000
>PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
>The key statements above were:
... "PETTION: <sic>, since the lies in this document were not
considered by the court in making its decision.
>Here is the result of the above document which still causes misery for those who
>can't refute me and choose to engage in hate:
>
>CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
>Lehigh County Courthouse
>455 W. Hamilton Street
>Allentown, PA 18101-1614
>RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
>
>Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
>
><START>
>
>Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
>CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
> Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
> ORDER
> AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
>Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
>Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
> IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
>
>[...]
And what goes here? Why, the text that shows that it was simply a
matter of jurisdiction. That's why the Shame of Belleville *has* to
edit the decision: to hide the fact that it doesn't say what zie
wishes it did.