> I have tried many times over VPN and I always type
news.google.com and I get redirected to whatever setting the *exit node’s* browser has, not > my browser. You can reproduce it too by using a VPN and selecting a server in some other non-English speaking country.
...
> And second question still remains: the freezings, the crashes and the corrupted context menu.
Actually, I don't think Google uses browser settings. It tries to use
location information: GPS, if available, otherwise IP address at
least. That is why the redirection happens.
Even in the case of Amazon, if I open
amazon.com from an IP in India,
it asks me whether I want to change the country to India (even if not
signed in), as
amazon.com and
amazon.in are two different websites for
most practical purposes. This is not the case for Google News, which
just changes the country and language settings, based on the location
or explicit selection by the user.
I do read the US news. And I explicitly select India-English when I
want to read India news. Without my explicit selection, it relies on
the location, as far as I can understand. And they try to guess the
location using all the tools and data at their disposal, including
machine learning, constrained perhaps by my privacy setting
(hopefully). If you are signed in, it will work in one way. If you are
not signed in (like in Tor Browser), it will work differently.
Even network service providers are beginning to treat different kinds
of traffic differently, based on the characteristics of the data,
looking at the headers, but also at packets, if necessary. If the data
is encrypted, they can still try to apply machine learning techniques
to predict what kind of data it is. There are PhD theses on this. Net
Neutrality is almost gone, or going out fast.
For websites etc., even if they don't know who the user is (not signed
in, using Tor), they can still create a profile of the session
(clicks, durations, scrolling etc.) if the session lasts long enough.
Based on this profile, they can try to predict who the user is or at
least what is the actual country. This I am saying off the top of my
head, based on what we do in AI and Natural Language Processing. One
thing is for sure, because of the exponentially more data available to
them and the resources they have, they can do a much better job at
such prediction than any researcher can do. This is almost common
knowledge in the research community, whether explicitly acknowledged
or not.
And if someone is targeted, then it's a whole other game, based on the
laws, rules and regulations of the country.
I have attached the screenshots about the second question, of
corrupted context menu.
Regards,