kernel version mismatches

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Rob Townley

unread,
Feb 2, 2021, 5:03:01 PM2/2/21
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
Kernel version numbers seem off, way off in some VMs and templates.   

Mainly, that /boot/initramfs does not does not match uname -r.

uname -r vs ls /boot/initramfs*  vs cat /proc/version vs cat /etc/os-release

OK dom0: 5.4.88-1.qubes, 5.4.88-1.qubes,  5.4.88-1.qubes, 4.0

BAD vm: 5.4.88-1.qubes, 5.10.11-100.fc32, 5.4.88-1.qubes, 32

BAD vmTemplate: 5.4.88-1.qubes, 5.10.11-100.fc32, 5.4.88-1.qubes, 32

All of these machines were restarted to rule out updates that require a reboot.  

p.s. I had to send this from my phone so formatting mis not what i would like.

awokd

unread,
Feb 6, 2021, 3:10:19 AM2/6/21
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
Rob Townley:
> Kernel version numbers seem off, way off in some VMs and templates.
>
> Mainly, that /boot/initramfs does not does not match uname -r.
>
> uname -r vs ls /boot/initramfs* vs cat /proc/version vs cat /etc/os-release
>
> OK dom0: 5.4.88-1.qubes, 5.4.88-1.qubes, 5.4.88-1.qubes, 4.0
>
> BAD vm: 5.4.88-1.qubes, 5.10.11-100.fc32, 5.4.88-1.qubes, 32
>
> BAD vmTemplate: 5.4.88-1.qubes, 5.10.11-100.fc32, 5.4.88-1.qubes, 32

I'm not sure what /proc/version shows on "normal" Linux vs. uname -r,
but maybe check what kernel the BAD vm or template is set to use on its
advanced tab?

--
- don't top post
Mailing list etiquette:
- trim quoted reply to only relevant portions
- when possible, copy and paste text instead of screenshots
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages