hplib complaint with fedora-28 qube manager update , what to do?

44 views
Skip to first unread message

John S.Recdep

unread,
Dec 30, 2018, 11:17:13 PM12/30/18
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

The following below was/is after using a manually opened xterm that
successfully runs $sudo dnf update
and closing the template/s ....


The Qubes Manager is showing green dots on the Fed-28 (Q4.0.1?)
templates needing update but:

when I use the QManager to update I am seeing some complaint about hplip

I tried to highlight and copy it but any clicking in the xterm and it
disappears .....

start a terminal for the template gives me this:

[user@fedora-28 ~]$ sudo dnf upgrade
Last metadata expiration check: 4:24:34 ago on Sun 30 Dec 2018 01:46:31
PM HST.
Dependencies resolved.

Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-3.18.6-7.fc28.x86_64
- nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-libs-3.18.6-7.fc28.x86_64
- nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-7.fc28.x86_64
- nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
libsane-hpaio-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 4: package hplip-libs-3.18.6-7.fc28.x86_64 requires
hplip-common(x86-64) = 3.18.6-7.fc28, but none of the providers can be
installed
- cannot install both hplip-common-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64 and
hplip-common-3.18.6-7.fc28.x86_64
- problem with installed package hplip-libs-3.18.6-7.fc28.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-common-3.18.6-7.fc28.x86_64
- nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
hplip-libs-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
========================================================================================================
Package Arch Version
Repository Size
========================================================================================================
Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
hplip-common x86_64 3.18.6-11.fc28
updates 110 k
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
hplip x86_64 3.18.6-11.fc28
updates 16 M
hplip-libs x86_64 3.18.6-11.fc28
updates 204 k
libsane-hpaio x86_64 3.18.6-11.fc28
updates 127 k

Transaction Summary
========================================================================================================
Skip 4 Packages

Nothing to do.
Complete!

unman

unread,
Dec 31, 2018, 5:07:06 AM12/31/18
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
It's an upstream bug: net-snmp-libs is still in testing. You can wait
for it to reach stable or run (as suggested)
dnf --best --allowerasing --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip

Keep an eye out to see if anything is being removed.

unman

brenda...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 31, 2018, 8:50:55 AM12/31/18
to qubes-users

...and if anything qubes-* related is removed, dnf install those packages *before* restarting the template.

(yes, I've been burned by that before)

Brendan

John S.Recdep

unread,
Dec 31, 2018, 4:53:56 PM12/31/18
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
On 12/31/18 3:50 AM,
If it doesn't effect security or break anything I can wait.

BTW, in the past I've never done $sudo dnf upgrade is this
really necessary?

Have always wondering if the scheme was similar to the debian
dist-upgrade , which Does seem to be required but somehow on Fedora
seems it might not be ?



Lastly, is Fedora-29 going to be officially recommended as a upgrade
sometime / somewhere soon ?


regards, recdep
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages