fedora-27-minimal: networking support?

43 views
Skip to first unread message

Johannes Graumann

unread,
May 27, 2018, 6:00:32 PM5/27/18
to qubes...@googlegroups.com

Hello,

The fedora-27-minimal template from the repo does not appear to have networking support. What needs to be installed to remedy that?

Thank you for any hint.


Sincerely, Joh

[799]

unread,
May 27, 2018, 6:41:06 PM5/27/18
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
Hello Johannes,

On 05/28 12:00, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> The fedora-27-minimal template from the repo does not appear to have
> networking support. What needs to be installed to remedy that?

I have just migrated all my sys-AppVMs from a fedora-26-minimal to a fedora-28-minimal image.
I also had some issues with networking and got it working after installing some more packages:

When I build my standard-App-Template for daily use, the AppVM was unable to connect to the web.
I had to install the following packages in the template to get networking:

dnf install qubes-core-agent-networking

I guess the same applies for fedora 27.

regards

[799]

Johannes Graumann

unread,
May 28, 2018, 3:46:50 AM5/28/18
to [799], qubes...@googlegroups.com
That indeed was the missing item ...
I had studied the 4.0 section of https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/templates
/fedora-minimal/, but failed to identify this, as the corresponding
listing is somewhat confusing: "... qubes-core-agent-networking:
Networking support. Required if the template is to be used for a sys-
net or sys-firewall VM." I want networking, but NOT use the https://www
.qubes-os.org/doc/templates/fedora-minimal/late as sys-net/-firewall

Thank you!

Joh

Johannes Graumann

unread,
May 28, 2018, 3:52:40 AM5/28/18
to [799], qubes...@googlegroups.com

schnuren...@gmail.com

unread,
May 28, 2018, 5:51:38 AM5/28/18
to qubes-users

> I want networking, but NOT use the https://www
> .qubes-os.org/doc/templates/fedora-minimal/late as sys-net/-firewall
>
> Thank you!
>
> Joh

Why not?
Isn't it a prefered way to have an All-I-Need-Is-In-For-Networking-VM?
Maybe additional packages someone would never use in an AppVm is an argument or to get only the basic support to lower any risk.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages