On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:03:20PM +0000, 'Tom Zander' via qubes-users wrote:
> On Monday, 11 December 2017 17:48:45 GMT Unman wrote:
> > This is a case where "making stuff work a lot nicer" isn't necessarily a
> > good idea.
>
> The "log nicer" is that it is quite a bit faster and error handling is much
> better.
>
If you are updating over Tor (as op seems to) the speed wont change.
> > I don't think you should advise against this without explaining the risks.
>
> Can you perhaps explain what you think those risks are?
>
> To me it boils down to; don't run any software except for "software upgrades"
> in your template.
>
> I'm wondering if this is a "protect the user from himself" or something real.
>
It's a "protect the user from himself" thing, and real. I dont
understand why you would put these in opposition. The TemplateVM is as
trusted as the most trusted qube based on it - it makes sense to keep it
as isolated as possible, and to restrict user activities.
Not having network access also helps mitigate risks from potentially
malicious software and install scripts.
I personally preferred it when the proxy filtered access, and run it like
this in my set-up. I also use a caching proxy instead of tinyproxy.
Of course, you dont need to use the proxy - you can install software
from wherever you like and allow unrestricted access from the Template, if
you choose. You dont need to validate software before installing. You
can do whatever you like, and Qubes will let you do it. That doesn't mean
it's a good idea.