fedora-24 update error: nothing provides ostree-libs(x86-64) >= 2016.14 needed by flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24.x86_64

70 views
Skip to first unread message

mitte...@digitrace.de

unread,
Mar 3, 2017, 9:40:20 AM3/3/17
to qubes-users
Hello fellow Qubes users,

If I execute update of the fedora-24 template via the Qubes VM manager,
it aborts with the error

nothing provides ostree-libs(x86-64) >= 2016.14 needed by
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24.x86_64

If I use
sudo dnf upgrade
from the terminal within fedora-24 the command is executed, but later
executions list the problem with flatpack (broken dependencies)

of course I can remove flatpack, but I don't know whether I may need it?!

thanks

raah...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 3, 2017, 6:38:24 PM3/3/17
to qubes-users, mitte...@digitrace.de

I removed it haven't noticed any problems. But I also wonder what it is.

raah...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 3, 2017, 6:41:32 PM3/3/17
to qubes-users, mitte...@digitrace.de, raah...@gmail.com

Hopefully removing it did not lessen my security?

Andrew David Wong

unread,
Mar 5, 2017, 5:31:48 AM3/5/17
to raah...@gmail.com, qubes-users, mitte...@digitrace.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Relevant issue: https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/2656

- --
Andrew David Wong (Axon)
Community Manager, Qubes OS
https://www.qubes-os.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=4Kzv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

raah...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 5, 2017, 3:05:16 PM3/5/17
to qubes-users, raah...@gmail.com, mitte...@digitrace.de

yes but is removing flatpack bad for my security? maybe I should install it again?

Andrew David Wong

unread,
Mar 5, 2017, 8:29:28 PM3/5/17
to raah...@gmail.com, qubes-users, mitte...@digitrace.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 2017-03-05 12:05, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 5:31:48 AM UTC-5, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> On 2017-03-03 15:41, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Friday, March 3, 2017 at 6:38:24 PM UTC-5, raah...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, March 3, 2017 at 9:40:20 AM UTC-5,
>>>>> mitte...@digitrace.de wrote:
>>>>>> Hello fellow Qubes users,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I execute update of the fedora-24 template via the Qubes VM
>>>>>> manager, it aborts with the error
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nothing provides ostree-libs(x86-64) >= 2016.14 needed by
>>>>>> flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24.x86_64
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I use sudo dnf upgrade from the terminal within fedora-24
>>>>>> the command is executed, but later executions list the problem
>>>>>> with flatpack (broken dependencies)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of course I can remove flatpack, but I don't know whether I may
>>>>>> need it?!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> I removed it haven't noticed any problems. But I also wonder
>>>>> what it is.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully removing it did not lessen my security?
>>>>
>
> Relevant issue: https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/2656
>
>
> yes but is removing flatpack bad for my security? maybe I should install it again?
>

Sorry, I have no idea. I'm guessing not, since it appears to be absent
from the fedora-minimal template.

- --
Andrew David Wong (Axon)
Community Manager, Qubes OS
https://www.qubes-os.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=TEcT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

raah...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 9, 2017, 1:42:00 PM3/9/17
to qubes-users, raah...@gmail.com, mitte...@digitrace.de

tks was wondering that.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages