Is not safe to use Qubes OS 3.2?

52 views
Skip to first unread message

davidm...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 4, 2019, 9:04:57 PM7/4/19
to qubes-users
Hi, i'm asking because my hardware is not compatible with qubes 4.0

Is not safe to use Qubes OS 3.2?

Thanks

awokd

unread,
Jul 4, 2019, 10:08:11 PM7/4/19
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
davidm...@gmail.com:
> Hi, i'm asking because my hardware is not compatible with qubes 4.0
>
> Is not safe to use Qubes OS 3.2?
>
> Thanks
>
It is less safe to use 3.2 than it used to be when it was getting
patches. It doesn't immediately become unsafe once it is no longer
supported, especially if you are keeping the templates up to date with
security patches. However, the longer you stay on 3.2, the less safe it
gets.

jsnow

unread,
Jul 5, 2019, 10:44:50 AM7/5/19
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
'awokd' via qubes-users:
If the choice is between using qubes 3.2 and using a monolithic linux
distro (because of incompatibility with 4.0), i'd say 3.2 is still the
better choice, but i'm not an expert.

--
Jackie

Claudia

unread,
Jul 5, 2019, 3:30:00 PM7/5/19
to davidm...@gmail.com, qubes-users
davidm...@gmail.com:
> Hi, i'm asking because my hardware is not compatible with qubes 4.0
>
> Is not safe to use Qubes OS 3.2?
>
> Thanks
>

Just curious, I'm guessing it's because of the VT-d requirement?

Like others have said, 3.2 is still probably safer than some random distro.

I wish we could have stuck with the PV-based VMs, which wouldn't require
VT-d, and are probably more efficient, but I can understand the reasons
for the switch to PVH.

-------------------------------------------------
This free account was provided by VFEmail.net - report spam to ab...@vfemail.net

ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the NSA's hands!
$24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features!
15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas!
Commercial and Bulk Mail Options!

js...@danwin1210.me

unread,
Jul 6, 2019, 1:08:44 AM7/6/19
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
'awokd' via qubes-users:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages