Hi,
I'm trying to use my ledger nano s and trezor with Qubes. I think the best approach, since I need to attach the entire USB controller for this to work, would be to use the existing sys-usb. However by default the sys-usb is not connected with any NetVM, hence I don't know if this would increase my attack vector.
What's the safest way to use trezor or ledger nano s with Qubes?
Should I use the sys-usb or should attach the USB controller to a different AppVM and use my HW wallet there? (The latter option will invalidate the use of my mouse, so if any other option is available, I'd glad hear it)
Thanks
--Thanks
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/37511761.234.1499886552897%40office.mailbox.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I also forgot to mention, if ultimately the sys-usb will have internet, then what's the difference between the sys-net or sys-usb? Why using two separated SysVMs if both can be used as a NetVM?
On 12 July 2017 at 22:52 Franz <169...@gmail.com> wrote:
I also forgot to mention, if ultimately the sys-usb will have internet, then what's the difference between the sys-net or sys-usb? Why using two separated SysVMs if both can be used as a NetVM?
I do have a sys-usb vm, however I cannot attach a netVM to it since the sys-usb is also a netvm.
I possibly will need to create a new sys-usb vm or is there any other alternative?
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/1455174408.2312.1499977395517%40office.mailbox.org.
Unfortunately that doesn't work either.
The "qvm-usb -l" doesn't show my legder nano s. In fact I can only see it attached on the sys-usb, not on dom0.
The qvm-usb list output shows no difference either I attach or not the HW wallet. The only way I can attach to another appvm is if I attach the entire PCI controller, via the usb-passthrough does not work.
Any alternatives?
Actually I do have the qubes-proxy-usb installed on my sys-usb (that's how I'm able to use my mouse) however I'm not sure if the qubes-proxy-usb can be used to pass the HW wallet.
How I'm I suppose to pass my Ledger nano s or trezor via the proxy?
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group.To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users...@googlegroups.com.To post to this group, send email to qubes...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/1441642922.1727.1500046931339%40office.mailbox.org.
Thank you for the effort in replying to me, I really appreciate :)
So the only viable option left in order for me to use my HW wallet in Qubes is to create a sys-usb from scratch, and create it as a AppVM instead of NetVM as the default?
Wouldn't this solution expose also any USB device to the internet? Is this a safe trade-off?
Isn't possible to attach only my HW wallet to an AppVM instead of assigning the whole USB controller? (I've tested this option, and once I assign my USB PCI device to another AppVM all my USB ports will also be assigned to the same AppVM)
Ideally I'm looking for the most secure possible solution - one that assigns only that USB port to another AppVM instead of exposing all my USB controller to the internet.
Is this possible? Does anyone knows?