-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:53:05AM +0000, IX4 Svs wrote:
> I noticed application errors in one of my AppVMs and quickly discovered
> this with dmesg:
>
> [25779.941639] hrtimer: interrupt took 4397732 ns
> [29981.965428] blkfront: xvdb: empty flush op failed
> [29981.965438] blkfront: xvdb: barrier or flush: disabled; persistent
> grants: enabled; indirect descriptors: enabled;
> [29981.965736] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev xvdb, sector 2157912
> [29981.966111] Aborting journal on device xvdb-8.
> [29981.969043] EXT4-fs error (device xvdb): ext4_journal_check_start:56:
> Detected aborted journal
> [29981.969055] EXT4-fs (xvdb): Remounting filesystem read-only
> [user@AppVM ~]$ touch lala
> touch: cannot touch ‘lala’: Read-only file system
> [user@AppVM ~]$
>
> This is how /dev/xvdb is mounted on this AppVM:
> /dev/xvdb on /rw type ext4 (rw,relatime,discard,data=ordered)
> /dev/xvdb on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,discard,data=ordered)
>
> /dev/xvdb is the private.img for this AppVM.
>
> Now, initially I suspected errors in the underlying filesystem or disk.
I think this is the most probable cause...
> Even though there were no errors in Dom0, I swapped the internal SSD,
> installed Qubes from scratch and restored my AppVMs. Unfortunately that
> didn't make any difference - I now see the exact same behaviour.
>
> After such a fault that results in a readonly filesystem in the AppVM,
> shutting down and booting the AppVM shows the following with dmesg:
> [ 5.345561] EXT4-fs warning (device xvdb): ext4_clear_journal_err:4728:
> Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure
> [ 5.345577] EXT4-fs warning (device xvdb): ext4_clear_journal_err:4729:
> Marking fs in need of filesystem check.
Because of some bug[1], you need to run fsck manually...
[1]
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/979
- --
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWdXCAAAoJENuP0xzK19csyDEH+wZzspDkg1D8LoKkag0sXzac
MWSJ69E+KEdmks7Qcwo2Wft5pF8K4a4fGrCiEy5BZPzMDsdXuqRkeE7KM6n+qc3B
VvcmsWf3YzH4hs52TZ3Q2FsVXtUB/xH4+VIsRd6qT86ZFZB4/PKcO9m2VRRcwELB
heLAHN6SHJZFh8xX4/zc+hSSZEInWlhymYzDfQCkseO6hXTvBhcyZnQ/HsHMjD8B
HAv09uUCMBuE1EZOBwddi3wb1/U1PdXU3NdiSelloRldkcKUZPGm5UdM/OUFy7Ej
trCYsJ34BGkYvGLL3WNNW0RNPz/ZTPz55IAG2Q/B6wTUYw1o9KyVza7445Te4Nc=
=+EGw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----