Stateful Job Queue
carlos
on top of each other (I want this). Is it possible to limit the job
queue to say 1 job and any others are just dropped?
Nuno Maia
You can limit the number of concurrent jobs by defining a proper value
in property "threadCount" and a missfire policy to skip the trigger
execution.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quartz.NET" group.
> To post to this group, send email to quar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quartznet+...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quartznet?hl=en.
>
carlos
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 7:04:34 AM UTC-7, Nuno Maia wrote:
Hi,You can limit the number of concurrent jobs by defining a proper value
in property "threadCount" and a missfire policy to skip the trigger
execution.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, carlos <cbd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marking a job as stateful should disallow the same jobs from running
> on top of each other (I want this). Is it possible to limit the job
> queue to say 1 job and any others are just dropped?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quartz.NET" group.
> To post to this group, send email to quar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quartznet+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Nuno Maia
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012, carlos <cbd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't want to limit the overall jobs running. I want to make it so if a new job is requested to run and there is already one of itself running and another queued to run after that one is done then it would just be dropped.
>
> On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 7:04:34 AM UTC-7, Nuno Maia wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You can limit the number of concurrent jobs by defining a proper value
>> in property "threadCount" and a missfire policy to skip the trigger
>> execution.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, carlos <cbd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Marking a job as stateful should disallow the same jobs from running
>> > on top of each other (I want this). Is it possible to limit the job
>> > queue to say 1 job and any others are just dropped?
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quartz.NET" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to quar...@googlegroups.com.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quartz.NET" group.