--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to quantu...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowner...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to quantumowner...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to quantu...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to quantumowners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
I played around with lowered and uprated springs on mine (16" wheels) and ended up going back to standard xr2 on the front and standard fiesta on the back, but on the back i cut out half a turn to lower it a small amount.You could probably lower the front in the same way, but be careful as it is a lot more difficult to put the spring back together again if you take too much off. ;-)
On 29 Mar 2017 9:52 pm, "calum mcpherson" <calma...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
--I've recently changed my wheels 15" with 195-50-15 tyres to the correct set up 14" with 185-55-14, and my 2+2 looks like a Land Rover.I was going to change springs anyway, but now have brought this job forward as not looking as I want.I understand that the manual states 'Quantum red springs' for front and Fiesta mk2 1100 springs for rear, however when looking at lowering springs, most seem to be a standardised Fiesta mk2 set up , most covering full range excluding XR2 !!!!Anyone got any experience with lowering springs , any recommendations would be great .Car has std. XR2 engine set-up, thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to quantu...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowner...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to quantumowner...@googlegroups.com.
Afraid i’m pretty sure that’s the higher rear spring and shock mounts.
To be sure, check at the top of the rear shock, you should find an extension screwed to it.
They used specific Quantum rear springs to make up the extra length.
I’m not sure why the early 2+2 were like this, i guess they did the moulds and then realised the car was just too low to be practical.
The front end they could change by modifying the spaceframe, the rear had to wait until they modified the moulds.
Jim
Put my hand up at side of shock, and does appear to be some sort of spacer / extension at top. Thinking about it, surely if spring length is reduced this would allow drop required (approx. 35mm) as sizes on diagram are with car unladen (does drop approx. 25mm when sitting in car). I presume as long as new spring weight is correct would still have same travel with lower wheel gap ?
Thanks again Jim for input, any further info would be very useful.
Calum.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.8007 / Virus Database: 4769/14209 - Release Date: 03/30/17
I'll keep that in mind, thanks.
--
The length of shock being increased by the spacer will surely only be for the extended length of the strut mount and not have any bearing on the spring length as spring sits between 2 fixed points on axle & body ? I have been thinking about this and doing diagrams all day to get my head round this, convinced I'm right, maybe.
Does anyone know the length of the 'Quantum' spec. spring for fronts ?
Have taken that into account Jim, thanks again.
Thanks guys, so it does look like my Pi springs have dropped the ride-height by about 25-30mm. I shall now keep a look out on ebay for some XR2 springs... Cheers, Tom -----Original Message----- From: quantu...@googlegroups.com [mailto:quantu...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of ROBERT CRAIG Sent: 06 August 2008 19:28 To: quantu...@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: Perennial spring question Mine are also approx 125mm and I don't think the car looks too high and in my opinion looks ok. Ride height is down to personal preference but I feel that my set up is a good compromise. I haven't managed a track day yet, so can't say whether it will be any good in that environment (I suspect not) but it's good on the road. http://www.madabout-kitcars.com/111/3515/3515picgallery.htm Bob Craig (Q2-267) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Haworth" <andy.h...@gmail.com> To: <quantu...@googlegroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:52 PM Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: Perennial spring question I've just measured mine, and I'm 99% sure I have the Quantum Red springs. 125mm between the top and bottom cups I do know I have the 1.1 rears, and the car sits up a bit at the front http://www.flickr.com/photos/23204281@N02/2674048045/sizes/l/ I'm on 185/60/14's -----Original Message----- From: quantu...@googlegroups.com [mailto:quantu...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of bobbyc...@tiscali.co.uk Sent: 06 August 2008 13:39 To: quantu...@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: Perennial spring question Tom, Yeh, they do look a bit short. I'll try to measure mine tonight. Bob Craig (Q2-2167)
----Original Message---- From: tom....@virgin.net Date: 06/08/2008 9:37 To: <quantu...@googlegroups.com> Subj: [Quantum Owners] Re: Perennial spring question Thanks Bob, tyre to body distance isn't so relevant as we have very differing tyres (mine are 205/40/16 on the back and 195/40/16 on the
front -
long story). What would be interesting is the distance on the front strut using
the XR2
spring between the top and bottom cups on the strut. Have a look at this photo to see what I mean... http://picasaweb.google.com/tw.
bloke/Quantum/photo#5231319611225567842
As you can see my gap is 90mm and the coils of the spring are very
close
together, which is why I think it is getting coilbound. This photo
is of
the nearside with the weight on the wheels. If anybody has the inclination I would be grateful to know what this distance is with other springs. Cheers, Tom. -----Original Message----- From: quantu...@googlegroups.com [mailto:
quantu...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Bob Craig Sent: 05 August 2008 23:40 To: Quantum Owners Group Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: Perennial spring question Hi Tom, I have 1100 springs and dampers on the rear and standard XR2 struts
on
the front. I chose this set up after lots of advice from various people on this group about a year ago (thanks again to all who helped). This set up suits me, as I have decent ground clearance to negotiate the many speed bumps. I get no tyre rubbing (185/60-14 tyres). I have recently pushed the car pretty hard on some of the country roads near me and it handled really well. A little bit skittish at high speed on poor surfaces but then, so was my Mini Cooper S. I can send you a picture if you want to see for yourself or I can measure the ground clearance and tyre to body clearance. Bob Craig (Q2-267) On 5 Aug, 09:07, "Tom Walker" <tom.bl...@virgin.net> wrote:Sorry for stirring this old thread up again, but after 4 years ofbottomingout on the tiniest of bumps and rubbing the tyres on the wheel
arches, I
decided it was time to make a change. So I have already swapped
out my
modified rear springs (cut down 1.1) for standard 1.1 rear springs
and
givenmyself 30mm more ride height at the back. I now need to bring the front up a bit. I currently have Pi parts up front, and they look very close to
being
coil-bound even at rest. Looking at QSCs parts list, they have 3 options:- Diesel, Standard
&
Special. Does anybody know the ratings of these? Are they all the same
height, but
different ratings? Any opinions? What about any other options? Are the "standard" ones from an XR2
or
other?Cheers, Tom
Aaarrrrgggghhhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!
More info from 2015 thread. Ooops, the scissor jack that fits is in the corner of my garage! It was standard xr2 rear and quantum red at the front. The 2+2 is similar weight as an xr2 so in theory xr2 springs should work. For me it definitely needed stiffer springs, the dampers were wound up to compensate, which in an ideal world is wrong. Early 2+2 had higher spring damper points and to achieve the 'on stilts look' had I think a 2" extension piece. Mine just had standard length everything and was an early chassis. That's actually a bit of a pain as most of the off the shelf stuff for an xr2 also gives a drop so won't fit. Later 2+2 had shorter Whatnots. At least that is what we seem to have figured out through various posts and discussions over the years. Preference on what was best to fit tended to align with age, under 40:= stiff as possible, over 40 = soft and comfortable. Your preference may vary of course. Rough starting point would be for soft go quantum springs with first dampers, harder xr2 all around, stiff with some damper adjustment gaz standard length with xr2 springs, fully customidable proper oilovers (the latter be careful to get standard height xr2 else you'll be scrapping the road) On 28 Dec 2015 18:21, Robert Craig <bobbyc...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
His is a question that comes up fairly regularly. Indeed, I asked it myself a few years back. However, there is no definitive answer as there are so many variables to consider. My first 2+2 ended up with standard XR2 front struts and springs and 1100 Fiesta rear shocks and springs. I found that set up was great with some sticky tyres and did many spirited runs. It did ground out on occasions over bumpy roads when pushing on but was very comfortable when driving "normally" . John Deverson has that car now and he would confirm that it handles like a go kart. My present 2+2 (ex Matthew Wastell car - I think it will always be known as that) has Gaz adjustable dampers. It originally had Quantum red springs on the front and I believe possibly -20mm springs on the rear. The car looked mean and handled good but was too low to get a standard trolley or scissor jack under and the front dampers would bottom out with an unnerving thud. I messed about with different springs and again settled on XR2 front and 1100 rear. It sits higher but still handles well although with the added weight of the turbo, charge cooler, oil cooler and LSD I think it could do with higher poundage springs on the front for spirited driving. Like I say, so many variables to consider. Bob Sent from my iPad On 28 Dec 2015, at 16:41, Jim Hearne <j...@quantums.info> wrote:
I have Gaz coilovers on my 2+2 The first thing to note is that they are only coilovers on the front, the rear still uses separate springs and shocks. The 2nd thing is it will be very low, even at the highest setting. Mine is a nightmare on speedbumps or even uneven road surfaces. I ended up winding the front coilovers up to max ride height and i just used standard XR2 springs on the rear, the GAZ ones were way too low. I notice they do offer to customise the setup to your requirements so it would be worth trying to get a higher ride height if you can. What setup is on your 2+2 at the moment ? Even the standard XR2 setup is often considered too low on the 2+2 Jim On 28/12/2015 12:03, SMIDG3T wrote:
Hi all. Hope you had a great Christmas. I've wanted to buy some coilovers for a while now and got some money at Christmas so I thought now is a good time to start looking around and asking on forums, hence this post. Do you have any recommendations? I've found a set of Gaz, are they any good? Here's the link: http://www.gazcoilovers.com/ford-c-9/fiesta-c-9_142/fiesta-mk12-c-9_142_143/ford-fiesta-mk-12-gaz-coilover-kit-p-18.html These would be for normal road use, no track days or anything like that. Thanks.
More info from 2015 thread. Ooops, the scissor jack that fits is in the corner of my garage! It was standard xr2 rear and quantum red at the front. The 2+2 is similar weight as an xr2 so in theory xr2 springs should work. For me it definitely needed stiffer springs, the dampers were wound up to compensate, which in an ideal world is wrong. Early 2+2 had higher spring damper points and to achieve the 'on stilts look' had I think a 2" extension piece. Mine just had standard length everything and was an early chassis. That's actually a bit of a pain as most of the off the shelf stuff for an xr2 also gives a drop so won't fit. Later 2+2 had shorter Whatnots. At least that is what we seem to have figured out through various posts and discussions over the years. Preference on what was best to fit tended to align with age, under 40:= stiff as possible, over 40 = soft and comfortable. Your preference may vary of course. Rough starting point would be for soft go quantum springs with first dampers, harder xr2 all around, stiff with some damper adjustment gaz standard length with xr2 springs, fully customidable proper oilovers (the latter be careful to get standard height xr2 else you'll be scrapping the road) On 28 Dec 2015 18:21, Robert Craig <bobbyc...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Thanks, back to the drawing board 
Thanks for reply Dave, interesting reading.
I was under car today and as my previous replies have noted what feels like an internal extension on the top of the rear shocker ( inside fibreglass strut mount accessible from below car), which would make sense as it is believed my car is an early model (see pic of strut top in boot, does this look similar to yours ?) As for rear spring, looks fairly std. top & bottom rubber mounts and internal bump stop , I did measure spring length at about 250mm with car sitting on level ground.
.VTS_01_1mpeg Quantum 1April.VOB
I've recently changed my wheels 15" with 195-50-15 tyres to the correct set up 14" with 185-55-14, and my 2+2 looks like a Land Rover
I was going to change springs anyway, but now have brought this job forward as not looking as I want.I understand that the manual states 'Quantum red springs' for front and Fiesta mk2 1100 springs for rear, however when looking at lowering springs, most seem to be a standardised Fiesta mk2 set up , most covering full range excluding XR2 !!!!Anyone got any experience with lowering springs , any recommendations would be great .Car has std. XR2 engine set-up, thanks.
Too long since i looked at one of the springs to remember the length.But, a picture of the area around the top suspension mount in the boot should tell me which version it is.Or, what is the chassis number ?, mine is 99 and has the high mounts.Jim
Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Lowering springs for my 2+2.
Thanks for the prompt reply Jim, I haven't a clue on the rear mounts, is there a rough length of spring that would indicate which I have at rear or front for that matter ?I don't want to be buying and fitting std. XR2 springs only to find I still have the same problem, but possibly a harsh ride too, as I have read that std. XR2 springs are too harsh for rear anyway.I have attached a pic (I think), with new wheels fitted to give you an idea of car, Thanks.Calum.
On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 22:06:38 UTC+1, Jim Hearne wrote:
Unless you are only travelling on good A roads and not going over speed bumps you will find lowering springs on a 2+2 rather a pain.
The 2+2 already sits lower than the donor Fiesta for a given setup, the XR2 was around 20mm lower and lowered XR2 spec springs will be another 30 or 40mm at least.
That's why Quantum recommended their red springs at the front and 1100 ((taller than XR2).
As a first step i would just try standard XR2 spec springs, not lowered ones.
One thing to watch out for, depending on the age of your 2+2, the early ones (up till past chassis number 99 at least) had rear spring and shock absorber mounts on the body that were about 60mm too high, Quantum fixed this with spacers on the top of the shocks and extra tall rear springs.
If your car is one of these then you will need to compensate for that on whatever rear springs you get.
My 2+2 has coilovers on the front and standard XR2 rear springs, but mine has the high rear mounts.
So i've effectively lowered it around 80mm from the Quantum intended spec, it is too low, i have to drive across most speed bumps at an angle and even then they hit the engine crossmember or exhaust.
And i can't use it to go to work as the uneven B roads cause similar problems.
Jim
On 29/03/2017 20:19, calum mcpherson wrote:I've recently changed my wheels 15" with 195-50-15 tyres to the correct set up 14" with 185-55-14, and my 2+2 looks like a Land Rover.
--
Springs are black, not Red and I can see no markings on them.
As said previously rear springs are sitting at 250mm approx. with car sitting on ground, so at a guess might be about 307mm (std rear 1100cc length) when not under load.
So the spacer on Rear shock (about 50-60mm) can be removed and std.1100cc springs fitted , which I would assume would give a drop, assuming existing springs are indeed the extended 'Quantum' one's, but would this give drop if rears are not ,and how much would you think?
By fitting XR2 springs to front (assuming not XR2 at present) would give at max about 30mm(depending on manufacturer),which would be fine.
Sorry to be a pain on this, but don't want to spend money and not get the results I want, thanks again.
Calum.
To post to this group, send email to ...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantu...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to quantu...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to quantu...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowner...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/quantumowners/MyARgF6QNqU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to quantum...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to quantumowner...@googlegroups.com.
As long as car can be seen sitting on its wheels that would be what I need to see.
I can't see a way to PM on this Forum or I would send you my number, but could pop over anytime to suit you.
--
As the spacer (I assume) screws onto the existing male screw fitting on top of shock , I doubt in terms of dropping in height that it would make much difference (as shock really only effects upstroke on suspension, not downstroke /load. I spoke to another 2+2 owner today , he has an early model (chassis in the 90s) , he has stripped rear suspension , and doesn't have a spacer / extender on his shock but car sits nicely in terms of wheel gap on same wheel / tyre set up as me. Beginning to think that it really depends what bits people have as to what gets fitted. As to cutting springs , would rather fit something designed to fit (if such a thing exists).
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.8012 / Virus Database: 4769/14227 - Release Date: 04/02/17
As far as I am aware the spacer/extensions are on both, and rear shocks are oil not gas , and I'm glad you agree with my theory on shock spacer.
Calum
--
Thanks for reply Jim,going to check what springs are on rear when removed , but want to upgrade shocks anyway to ensure they are operating properly (old one's do look well worn, though not leaking) , thinking gas ones rather than oil as fronts are gas struts, always used gas rather than air when upgrading.
So to clarify all I am doing is changing rear shocks at present , then will see how it all sits, and will leave in (if they are indeed there) the extenders till I change rear springs (if I go for shorter ones).
Was out for a run with Bob Craig in his 2+2 at the weekend , quite a beast , well impressed with the whole package , particularly how solid and planted it all felt,the power was too much tbh for my needs though was very impressive.
I would settle for the ride and solid feel of Bob's tbh , although I do realise he has expensive Gaz adjustable struts & shocks fitted , sadly out of my budget.
Wish I had the budget Bob, but can't justify it for my hobby car. Going to upgrade rear shocks (ordered the gas KYB one's) , and will try the 'Q' front springs (which are now shining like a new pin) then check what springs I have size wise , and take it from there.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/quantumowners/MyARgF6QNqU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to quantumowner...@googlegroups.com.