I am currently analyzing an RNAseq dataset with 18 different samples, all of which were prepared using the same techniques. I ran fastqc on all of the samples followed by STAR genome alignment and Qualimap. The MultiQC report indicated that one of the samples has a very low 5'-3' bias of 0.22. This same sample also has a high duplication rate and low % aligned to the genome. I have attached the output table and coverage profile image.
Because all of these samples were prepared using the same approach at the same time, I am assuming this is not a prep difference issue. Could this be a result of low RNA input quality or quantity? What is the best way to account for this high 3' bias? I would prefer to not have to remove the whole sample.
Thanks in advance!
Carly
![BulkRNASeq_MultiQC.png](https://groups.google.com/group/qualimap/attach/fde4ceaec35ce/BulkRNASeq_MultiQC.png?part=0.1&view=1)
![Qualimap_GeneCoverageProfile.png](https://groups.google.com/group/qualimap/attach/fde4ceaec35ce/Qualimap_GeneCoverageProfile.png?part=0.2&view=1)