Ontological change of clerical orders?

Skip to first unread message


Jun 3, 2018, 5:39:14 PM6/3/18
to Quaestiones Disputatae: The Ite ad Thomam Forum
I have been told that only the subdeacon and up have an ontological change but this does not seem correct to me. Perhaps in this case ontological has a different meaning.

Is it not true that a king, who having attained the relational accident of king, have undergone some sort of ontological change?

Also I think here St. Thomas proves that the minor orders undergo an ontological change.

ST III, Q35, A2

Article 2. Whether in the sacrament of Order a character is imprinted in connection with all the Orders?

I answer that, There have been three opinions on this point. For some have said that a character is imprinted only in the Order of priesthood; but this is not true, since none but a deacon can exercise the act of the diaconate, and so it is clear that in the dispensation of the sacraments, he has a spiritual power which others have not. For this reason others have said that a character is impressed in the sacred, but not in the minor*, Orders. But this again comes to nothing, since each Order sets a man above the people in some degree of authority directed to the dispensation of the sacraments. Wherefore since a character is a sign whereby one thing is distinguished from another, it follows that a character is imprinted in each Order. And this is confirmed by the fact that they remain for ever and are never repeated. This is the third and more common opinion.
Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages