even if Qlab is not the only thing reading timecode, you could still
use the approach Sean describes below for the Qlab stuff and then the
time code for everything else... That said..
If Qlab is generating the timecode, then why use timecode at all?
I understand using timecode when it's coming off a video deck or
something like that which everything needs to synch to - but why not
just send individual midi commands to your other devices from Qlab -
that way you can look at all of your cue timing in one place (Qlab)
and adjust it in one place...yes, it means creating the "go" cue in
Qlab as well as the actual cue on the light board or other device, but
to me the small amount of extra work isn't a big deal compared to the
ability it gives me to see and adjust everything together.
do understand I'm not trying to start a war here - it's just another
way of doing it - and it works very well for me since in most cases
I'm handling sound, lighting, and projection - in a situation where
departments are more separate, they may be happier with just getting
time code.
Andy
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Sean Dougall <
se...@figure53.com> wrote:
> Of course if QLab is the only thing you're trying to trigger with this
> timecode, you could do without timecode entirely and instead put the
> relevant cues in a group cue set to "Fire all children simultaneously", and
> use their pre-wait times to define their timing relative to each other,
> which would give you slightly more accurate timing. If your setup is such
> that timecode works better, though, the above should work.
--
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here:
http://groups.google.com/group/qlab