On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Freddy Komp <
busy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I hope I wasn't sounding nagging, I had clearly misunderstood what was
> communicated about this issue earlier, where it sounded to me like QLab3
> supports everything that is supported by AVFoundation (in my head I imagined
> something comparable to standard decoding methods exposed in AVFoundation
> for all codecs it supports), and that the issue with HAP was that it wasn't
> part of the subset of codecs AVFoundation supports. My bad :).
Not nagging at all, Freddy; it's something we're interested in looking
into, too, as it has some exciting implications!
There is a misunderstanding here, but it's not about what QLab
supports, but about what the release of HapInAVFoundation means. Hap
is not built into AVFoundation, it's a third-party add-on. And while
it now works through AVfoundation, it is fundamentally different in
how it works from other codecs, both in terms of what type of frame
data HapInAVFoundation is currently built to provide, and in how its
track data is read. These differences are currently incompatible with
how QLab handles video data, so it's not as simple as ticking one box
to enable Hap, or just installing HapInAVFoundation to enable it.
I hope that clears it up!
-Andy