--
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here:
http://groups.google.com/group/qlab
Follow Figure 53 on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Figure53
Thrilled to hear the program is proving useful, and thanks for sharing these tips!
Another tip regarding the following:
On Mar 11, 2012, at 12:04 AM, Mike wrote:
> so you don't have to calculate and adjust
> follow times in a cue sequence anymore
Another way to solve the "adjusting a chain of times" problem is to put all the cues in a group that is in "fire all children simultaneously" mode, and then use the pre-wait times to place them in an absolute position relative to the start of the group. This is functionally like giving them a timecode trigger, except the "timecode" is in the pre-wait field.
Best,
C
> Figured out a neat trick to have an MTC stream from QLab loop back and
> run your entire cue list so you don't have to calculate and adjust
> follow times in a cue sequence anymore (very useful in dance with 2-20
> minute audio tracks, and especially if you are using QLab to generate
> timecode output to other sources):
You could save yourself a hoop or two by using the IAC bus; I use it to loop MSC back into QLab so that "next" and "previous" also load the cues. What's more, I think you can hang multiple clients off the IAC bus, so monitoring apps can see what's on the bus without needing to split it.
I don't quite follow the advantages of your method over putting all the cues in a "Fire all children simultaneously" Group Cue and setting pre waits on each cue, just as you do for their timecode triggers? Does the MTC method handle loading to time and pausing better? I can see how it helps to have QLab chase timecode itself if it is acting as timecode master, though.
Rich
Jeremy Lee
- A thumb is a terrible speller. Please forgive my trespasses.
Sean